btn_blue.gif (90 bytes)URI HomeCampusesDirectoriesFast LinksSearchHelp
URI Text Box

Memorandum

Introduction
Assumptions

Principal  Academic Goals

Academic Plan Home
URI Home
orange_line.gif (36 bytes)

Academic Plan 1998
Principal Academic Goals

This plan is structured around five major themes which encapsulate the overarching academic priorities of the institution: focus areas; the liberal arts core; compelling learning experiences; the research mission; and outreach and economic development.


GOAL #1  — Focus Areas: Driving Resources toward Excellence

GOAL #2 — The Liberal Arts Core: Shaping the Future and Preserving the Past

GOAL #3 — Compelling Learning Experiences in the Learner-Centered University

GOAL #4 — The Research Mission: Growth and Application in Research and Graduate Education

GOAL #5 — Outreach and Economic Development: A Core Component of the University’s Obligation


GOAL #1 — Focus Areas: Driving Resources Toward Excellence

The University will continue to focus the academic programs, both undergraduate and graduate, and the research/scholarship programs into the following areas:

  • Marine and the Environment
  • Health
  • Children, Families and Communities
  • Enterprise and Advanced Technology.

Rationale

    In spite of the mythology surrounding land-grant institutions, it is certainly true that no institution of higher education has ever been able to be "all things to all people." It is clear today that even the most generously supported institutions must become more selective in the areas they elect to support and nurture. To meet our own expectations as well as those of the people we serve, we must focus available resources to a select few areas which we can then afford to do well. All of the planning initiatives and documents developed in the last decade have recognized this reality and sought to identify those areas of existing strength as well as those in which we have a reasonable opportunity to become strong. Concurrently, the University has worked to develop both a process to strengthen the focus areas and strategies for accomplishing it.

    Not only is focus necessary in order to live within our resource constraints, but it is essential if the University is to establish and maintain an institutional distinctiveness required in today's competitive world as well as to meet its mandate to address issues important to society. Simply put, we must compete for appropriately qualified students and for the resources to sustain the programs which attract them. The University needs a clear and well defined public image which establishes it as a vital institution positioned to meet the rapidly changing needs of the State, the county, and the world.

    As a result of many years of conversations on campus, the University's Mission Statement explicitly identifies four areas of programmatic focus in addition to its historical strength in the traditional arts and sciences: Marine and the Environment; Health; Children, Families, and Communities; and Enterprise and Advanced Technology. Within each of these areas much has already been done and much more remains to be done

Major Steps Taken to Date

  • Developed the Program Contribution Analysis (PCA) to permit an assessment of the financial impact of degree programs. Based in part on the findings from this analysis, 46 academic programs were suspended and another 105 were flagged for further management attention. The same ad hoc committee which developed the PCA identified the four focus areas (and the Liberal Arts Core-see Goal #2).
  • Established and funded four partnerships: 1) Sensors and Surface Technology, 2) Public Health Partnership in Infectious Disease Control, 3) Partnership for the Coastal Environment, and 4) the Health Promotion Partnership. The intent of partnerships is to enhance opportunities for entrepreneurial faculty, graduate and undergraduate students to conduct research and learn collaboratively in a learner-centered environment. Partnerships bring shared resources to any set of problems identified as part of one or more focus areas.

Change in Progress

  • All new faculty appointments are being carefully matched with priorities within the focus areas. Even faculty appointments in some traditionally important areas are being restructured to contribute to the focus areas. An example of this is a recently appointed faculty member in maritime history. This position was needed to continue to deliver the curriculum, but the individual appointed was also an expert in maritime history and, hence, can provide support to the marine and environment focus area.

Future Plans

  • Refine the organizational structure within Academic Affairs to promote the focus areas. This is an evolving process which is made more complex in light of the traditional organizational structure of the University. For example, colleges exist with individual missions, but they and the units within them will evolve in their missions and composition. As part of this change process, the relationship of colleges and disciplinary units with the focus areas and the sharing of leadership responsibilities among the leaders of each must be clarified and made mutually supportive. This is an ongoing process.
  • Identify broad initiatives within the focus areas that will bring multidisciplinary groups together to highlight and strengthen University capabilities.
  • Align all current and future partnerships with the focus areas and ensure that they expand the capacity and enhance the major initiatives of the focus areas. A request for new partnership proposals will be made during Spring 1998 with one or more new partnerships expected to be authorized for 1999.
  • Study "Statewide" degree programs sponsored jointly with Rhode Island College. Several different models are likely to be employed depending on the specific programs involved. Model programs in African and African-American Studies and Women's Studies are near the proposal stage. Other possibilities include undergraduate programs in some languages, anthropology, and the fine arts. Graduate program possibilities include political science, history, music and communication studies.
  • Collaborate-in a similar spirit-by pursuing articulated programs with CCRI. Dental Hygiene has initiated a variation on the 2+2 model with a 1+2+1 program leading to an A.S. and a B.S. degree after four years.
  • Seek formal approval for the discontinuation of the 46 suspended programs.

Resources

  • Establishing focus areas recognizes explicitly that the anticipated flow of resources to the University will not be especially bountiful. In other words, there has been an acknowledgment that finite resources will have to be deployed judiciously and that those resources which are driven to the focus areas will be re-deployed rather than new resources. Nevertheless, financial resources are of critical importance in our ability to focus.
  • In response to the above, faculty positions not connected to priorities within the focus areas have not been filled. Examples already have occurred in every college over the past several years.
  • The Office of the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs estimates that 90 faculty members will be eligible for retirement within the next 5 years. This provides numerous degrees of freedom with our human resources which are coincidentally the most expensive.
  • While this will become more explicit in the future, the initiatives underway and those yet to be undertaken will be intrinsically connected to facility plans. For example, plans detailed later in this report inextricably relate the rehabilitation and upgrading of Ranger Hall with an initiative for Environmental Biotechnology that has been proposed by the Marine and Environmental focus area.
  • At least as important as financial resources to this process will be the identification of effective leadership. The Marine and Environment focus area has realized some significant successes due to the imaginative leadership of the Vice Provost for Marine Programs who has proven very adept at nurturing the development of this area. Similarly insightful leadership will be essential to the success of all focus areas as well as the colleges in whatever form they may take in the future. Such leadership is being recruited for the vacancies in the College of Business Administration as well as others.

Challenges

  • The process of driving resources towards areas of emphasis inevitably produces resistance from some quarters, but this resistance will have to be overcome. The ability of the University's administration and governance processes to say no to worthwhile but less central initiatives will be sorely tested.
  • Because of the legacies of the past, faculty are not always in the disciplines where they now are needed. Careful replacement decisions can rectify this, but a good deal of time is needed to effect this change.
  • The identification and empowerment of focus area leaders and their respective responsibilities are essential. The leaders must assist the institution in understanding choices being made between/among colleges across the institution.
  • Each focus area must develop a thematic set of goals, prioritize initiatives, identify faculty needs and hiring priorities-aiming for hiring that serves multiple institutional needs.
  • The institution must work to resolve questions surrounding rewards and incentives within the focus areas and partnerships.
  • A new organizational structure which blends existing colleges with newly identified focus areas and newly initiated partnerships will have to be established.
  • All of this must be done in a way that will present this restructuring in a coherent way to current and prospective students.

Applications of Goal #1 within the Focus Areas

I. Marine and the Environment

Major Steps Taken to Date

  • The Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs assigned leadership of the College of Resource Development to the Vice Provost for Marine Programs and Dean of the Graduate School of Oceanography in order to strengthen ties with the Graduate School of Oceanography and encourage cooperation between the two units.
  • The College of Resource Development has begun major restructuring including revision of degree programs, acceptance of the transfer of the Department of Geology from the College of Arts and Sciences, and generally becoming much more focused on the environment and the life sciences, particularly as they relate to marine and coastal problems.

Change in Progress

  • The Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Molecular Genetics (BMMG) is in the final stages of transferring from the College of Arts and Sciences to the College of Resource Development to emphasize and strengthen links between the department and other life sciences within the College. (Target approval date is July 1, 1998.)
  • A new mission statement has been developed by the College of Resource Development that clarifies its strength in environmental studies and life sciences. The process of changing the name of the College to reflect this mission is underway. (Target approval date is July 1, 1998.)
  • The transfer of the Department of Marine Affairs from the College of Arts and Sciences to the College of Resource Development is underway. (Target approval date is July 1, 1998.)
  • Full Board approval of the Coastal Institute is being sought to foster additional initiatives in the coastal and estuarine environment. (Target approval date is July 1, 1998.)
  • A Master's of Oceanography degree has been proposed and is working its way through the University's approval process with a desired start date of July 1, 1998.
  • The College of Resource Development is in the process of revising a number of graduate degree programs to reflect its changing mission.
    Proposed programs to be transmitted for approval:
    Environmental Sciences, Ph.D.
    Environmental Science and Management, M.S.
    Suspended programs to be transmitted for elimination:
    Natural Resources Science, M.S. and Ph.D.
    Plant Science, M.S. and Ph.D.
    Geology, M.S.
    Entomology, M.S.
    Fisheries, Animal, and Veterinary Science, Ph.D.

Future Plans

  • A multidisciplinary initiative in Environmental Biotechnology has been proposed by the Interim Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences, the Vice Provost for Marine Programs (who is also Dean of the Graduate School of Oceanography and Interim Dean of the College of Resource Development), and faculty in areas of molecular biological research and teaching. The Environmental Biotechnology Initiative will encompass undergraduate as well as graduate programs because there is a strong demand for undergraduates with knowledge of molecular biological techniques.
  • The timeliness of the Environmental Biotechnology Initiative is in part due to the opportunities presented by the forthcoming rehabilitation of Ranger Hall. External dollars for repairs and updating of the infrastructure are available from the 1996 bond referendum. There are a number of other factors, however, that make this the right moment to move forward with this initiative:
    1. the combination of relevant academic, research and outreach programs and their relationship to the focus area;
    2. existing faculty and staff expertise in many departments;
    3. compelling interest in biotechnology in the scientific and public communities;
    4. employment opportunities for those with graduate and undergraduate degrees in a variety of majors with biotechnology applications;
    5. ability to attract significant federal and corporate funds;
    6. ability to attract and sustain high-quality researchers in the field;
    7. bringing together of a strong community of biological scientists to facilitate sharing of expensive research equipment.
  • Timeline for the Environmental Biotechnology Initiative:

    Academic Year 1997-98-adoption of proposal by Marine and Environmental Focus Area.

    Calendar Year 1998-submission of proposals to traditional federal and new corporate sources for new Ranger Hall infrastructure; modification of curriculum to include biotechnology components.

    Fall 1999-appoint new faculty pending the acquisition of funding and program approval.

    Academic Year 1999-2000-completion of facility.

II. Health

Major Steps Taken to Date

  • A six-year Doctor of Pharmacy program (Pharm.D.) was initiated which will become the entry professional degree in this field. The number of separate departments within the College of Pharmacy was reduced from five to three to improve operating efficiency and bring faculty together in ways more consistent with developing research initiatives.
  • A Distance Education Pharm.D. course is currently serving 10 students in Bangor, Maine through the use of a PictureTel link from the Providence campus. These 10 students add to the traditional on-site enrollment of 66 Providence-based students. This is a cooperative effort among the College of Pharmacy, the CCE Special Programs Office and Information and Instructional Technology Services.
  • The College of Nursing enjoys an ongoing collaboration with both the Community College and the Rhode Island College nursing programs.
  • A Health Promotion minor is graduating its first student this May.
  • An interdisciplinary Psychology course taught by several faculty in the Health Promotion Partnership has been offered for three semesters.
  • Smoking, weight management and elderly health teams are actively involved in community outreach.
  • The elderly health team was awarded $33,000 from the Rhode Island Public Health Foundation to establish state physical activity program for clients located in senior housing sites and centers.
  • A multidisciplinary Health Focus committee has reviewed curricular offerings to identify overlap and redundancy as well as new courses that would be appropriate. This group will begin discussing faculty hiring priorities in the near future.
  • Faculty Senate approval of an interdisciplinary minor in thanatology (study of loss, death, and dying) is being sought.

Change in Progress

  • The newly formed department of Biomedical Sciences in the College of Pharmacy is developing several new research initiatives in pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacoeconomics. (ongoing)
  • Development of a Master's in Public Health (MPH) Program that is in the approval process. The MPH was developed by a group of faculty in the health focus area. To foster the interdisciplinary nature of the program, the seven deans whose faculty would teach in this program selected the Dean of the College of Nursing to head this administrative group and to communicate with the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs and the broader community in matters related to the proposed public health program.
  • An on-site option for the Non-thesis Master's degree in Chemistry will be offered at Pfizer Industries of Connecticut. This offering is part of the University's continuing work with industry in serving adult populations. (Target approval date is September, 1998.)
  • As part of the Health Promotion Partnership, a study of clients with diabetes has begun in collaboration with VNS HomeCare in Wakefield, Rhode Island and the College of Nursing. Students from nursing, nutrition, exercise physiology and psychology are participating as "coaches." Each semester, 25 students are expected to participate.
  • The Health Promotion Partnership has added an Alcohol Team which will study alcohol abuse problems on campus.
  • Current initiatives between the nursing programs at URI, RIC and CCRI include:
    1. a joint effort together with the Hospital Association of Rhode Island to survey nurses across the State;
    2. work on an articulation program between RIC and URI;
    3. RIC and CCRI participation in URI's "Best and Brightest Program" which actively recruits strong students into the University's graduate programs.
  • The Dental Hygiene Program has developed a 1+2+1 program with CCRI. This program will admit students to URI where they will take their freshman year, and will continue them as URI students on leave while they take the two clinical years at CCRI before returning to URI to complete their bachelor's degree.
  • Plans are being finalized to have the CCRI Dental Assistant Program (a one year certificate program) offered on the URI campus in the Dental Hygiene clinical facility.
  • Development of a bachelor's degree at URI designed to serve students from several of the health-related programs at CCRI which would provide clear paths to a bachelor's degree and prepare them for a range of graduate and professional programs.

Future Plans

  • A graduate program in Occupational Therapy as a companion program for our existing Physical Therapy Program is being studied. This offers opportunities for collaboration with the Department of Rehabilitative Services and opportunities for articulation with CCRI.
  • The proposed Master's of Public Health being developed in active partnership with the Department of Health. It will forge a new model for interdisciplinary programs at the University.
  • The Health Promotion Partnership members are writing a training grant to fund pre-doctoral students, who will gain research experience by working with the various research teams in the partnership.
  • Faculty in the College of Nursing are working collaboratively with a Rhode Island hospital, and the elderly health team from the University's Health Promotion Partnership to develop a nursing center focused on care of the elderly. Both undergraduate and graduate students will be involved in the work of the center.
  • The Nurse Midwifery Program is exploring the development of a center with a Rhode Island hospital.
  • The Nurse Midwifery Program is discussing a distance education program using PictureTel for masters' students at the University of Vermont who are interested in earning a certificate in Nurse Midwifery.
  • The Health Focus deans' group will hear the recommendations of the curriculum committee for the Health focus area at the end of the semester. The goals are to a) identify courses that might be taught in an interdisciplinary way; b) identify unmet course needs; and c) prioritize faculty needs for interdisciplinary courses such as anatomy and physiology.
  • Clinical services are offered (or will be offered) in each of the Health focus-related colleges. The deans' group will be investigating the cost effectiveness of a unified billing system and the adequacy of malpractice insurance for students and faculty who are treating patients.
  • The deans' group and faculty on the marketing committee will be looking into the development of a web page to promote the activities of the Health Focus group and its members. The web page could also take care of the request of the research committee for communicating research interests and activities of health-related faculty.

III. Children, Families and Communities

Major Steps Taken to Date

  • The Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs brought new leadership to our Education programs with the appointment of a new chair of the Department of Education and relocation to URI of his National Center on Public Education and Social Policy which is funded by the Carnegie, Lilly and Kauffman Foundations.
  • The Human Development and Family Studies Department has engaged in a year-long planning effort to align with this focus area.
  • As an original partner in RINet (the PreK-12 network), URI brought internet technology to schools and is now playing a major role in helping teachers to use this technology. Last summer, under sponsorship of the Rhode Island Foundation and the Rhode Island Department of Education this program grew to support 314 trainees and 37 trainers; three additional years of activity are planned.
  • Continued development of important connections between URI and the disciplines in K-12 education. Two examples: GEMS-NET, which received $1.3 million in NSF funding to link URI scientists with elementary and middle schools, strengthening the science-based content in these grade levels. In mathematics education, URI developed national assessment models and methods for beginning teachers of mathematics.
  • Increased clinical and outreach programs in Providence with the opening of the Patricia Feinstein Child Development Center, the Speech and Hearing Clinic, and additional clinical space to support marriage and family therapy and clinical psychology. The National Center on Public Education also is located in our new Providence facility.
  • The University's National Center on Public Education and Social Policy is now fully operating and continuing its path-breaking national initiative on school reform.

Change in Progress

  • The University partnership with the Rhode Island Department of Education (RIDE) is working to develop, manage and disseminate school accountability for the overall improvement of public education. (ongoing)
  • URI, CCRI, and RIC are developing a plan to increase the students of color who earn a teaching certificate. Working initially with the Education and Social Services program at CCRI-Providence, a three-year initiative in which an instructor from URI and one from RIC have co-taught an education class at the CCRI-Providence campus has strengthened the articulation of the teacher education programs from CCRI to the four-year institutions.
  • URI and RIC are partners in a statewide effort to increase the number of teachers who become certified through the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. Other partners in this effort include the Rhode Island Foundation, the Rhode Island Department of Education, the two teacher unions, and the Rhode Island Legislature.
  • The Consumer Affairs program is reorganizing to provide focused instruction in the area of personal finance. With the support of Cooperative Extension, the program is partnered with a community agency to provide outreach services in the area of personal and family finance.
  • The B.S. in Human Science and Services has been redesigned to be an outcomes-oriented degree, helping students to articulate their academic and professional goals and then design a program to draw upon URI classes, internships, study abroad opportunities, and other learning experiences for which credit may be awarded to achieve their own goals.
  • URI faculty are working to include an international component in this focus area through increased efforts to do significant work and study in a range of other countries.

Future Plans

  • The University is focusing its educational programs on three major areas, consistent with the land-grant tradition: 1) career-long professional development of teachers, beginning with pre-service education, 2) advanced research and policy analysis, and 3) studies in public education and educational reform.
  • Consistent with the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE), the University has proposed the establishment of a School of Education to ensure the coordination of its academic programs; promote deep and broad disciplinary and interdisciplinary team-based preparation of future educators; and create the structures and processes required to employ effectively the emerging models of collaboration with schools, institutions of higher education and other partners.
  • URI and RIC continue to explore areas of potential cooperation in professional development schools, specific teacher education programs, and in preprofessional preparation in communicative disorders.
  • A Ph.D. in Human Development is being explored, focusing on the area of applied developmental science.
  • Under consideration is a psychological community consultation and evaluation center to work with communities in developing community-based initiatives and provide rapid response capacity to small human services agencies seeking external funding.
  • A partnership with a telecommunications corporation is underway to establish electronic links for on-line communication between and among all of Rhode Island's public schools.
  • The focus area will work to strengthen instruction, particularly at the advanced graduate level, in the area of policy studies related to Children, Families and Communities.
  • Community conversations, led by URI faculty from sociology, philosophy, and human services are continuing to promote community engagement in core issues concerning children, families, and communities. Funding is being sought to continue this program of public engagement.

IV. Enterprise and Advanced Technology

Major Steps Taken to Date

  • · The University's computing programs, and particularly the Computer Science Department, has developed an outreach initiative to the State's technology industry and received corporate grants from GTECH and Cherry Semiconductor.

Change in Progress

  • A search is underway for a new Dean of the College of Business Administration who will be assigned leadership in this focus area initiative. (ongoing)
  • The Sensors and Surface Technology Partnership is developing new technologies to detect food contamination and pathogens. The application of this technology has significant promise for projects contributing to Economic Development.
  • The Rhode Island Economic Policy Council (EPC) awarded $1.25 million in State grants from the Samuel Slater Technology Fund's Innovation Partnership Program. URI is a partner to 86 companies or agencies with grants in 7 of the 15 collaboratives. Slater grants are expected to boost the State's economy by creating job growth and higher wage jobs. Innovative Partnership Projects include:
    1. Implementation of agile manufacturing relationships.
    2. Development of advanced rapid prototyped tooling capabilities.
    3. Increase visibility and competitiveness of Rhode Island software development firms.
    4. Development of alternative solvents for cleaning electronic and plastic components.
    5. Develop models of semiconductor devices.
    6. Improvement of materials test system.
    7. Expand educational and research programs vital to software industry.
  • Implementation of an International Business Program. (Target date is September 1998.)
  • The College of Business Administration has developed a new minor in business which will allow students majoring in other areas to bolster their ability to apply their knowledge in business settings.
  • Cooperative arrangements with RIC exist or are being explored in a number of programs including:
    Undergraduate- Labor Studies, B.A.
    Graduate- Labor and Industrial Relations, M.A.
  • Establish a new major in Financial Services which will support the State's stated priority of expanding the financial services industry within Rhode Island.

Future Plans

  • The College of Business Administration and the College of Engineering are jointly developing three programs:
    1. A Master's Degree in Management of Technology;
    2. A Master's Degree in Construction Management (developed from discussions among faculty in Engineering, Labor Research, Business Administration and representatives from the construction industry);
    3. Both a B.S. and an M.S. in Transportation Systems and Management.
  • Representatives from both the College of Engineering and the College of Business Administration are working with the Rhode Island Department of Transportation to establish a transportation research and management center.
  • The College of Business Administration is working on the development of an M.S. in Finance, an undergraduate major in Financial Services, and the addition of Accounting to the College's range of Ph.D. offerings.
  • The College of Engineering is exploring a B.S. degree program in Manufacturing Engineering.
  • Efforts are underway to formalize the distinctive nature of each of the College of Business Administration's three M.B.A. degrees.

    The Providence (evening) M.B.A. program will include new opportunities: 1) a 15-18 credit certificate program for non-matriculated working professionals; 2) market driven specializations which might include Financial Engineering, Management of Technology, Health Care Management; 3) a modular structure which allows working professionals more convenient access to coursework.

  • Development of an M.B.A. in International Sports Management.

V. Crosscutting Focus Area Development

Major Steps Taken to Date

  • The University's Ocean Technology Center was selected by the Rhode Island Economic Policy Council (EPC) as one of two Research Centers of Excellence. The EPC awarded the Center $300,000 from the Samuel Slater Fund. The Ocean Technology Center is in turn responsible for awarding "re-grants" after evaluating proposals from for-profit, often start-up companies, with projects aimed at economic development through applications of ocean technology. Current re-grantees include:
    Subchem Systems, Inc.   developed on-site technology for measuring levels in water of phosphates, nitrates, etc.
    VG Sea Farms   marine aquaculture developing stocks of tautog and summer flounder at Quonset Point.


    The Center also has a full-time technology transfer facilitator funded by the U.S. Department of Commerce.

Change in Progress

  • There are currently centers with temporary authorization. The centers have missions which cut across the focus areas, such as the Center on Gender Studies, the Feinstein Center for Service Learning, the National Center for Public Education on Social Policy, and two recent centers in Student Affairs-one in leadership development and the other in substance abuse research. Formal authorization is being sought for those centers most established because the formal status is an important imprimatur for extramural funding sources. The University will continue to be exploring centers that cut across traditional disciplines and advance the mission of one or more focus areas.
  • The Departments of Computer Science and Communication Studies in the College of Arts and Sciences, Electrical and Computer Engineering in the College of Engineering, the Graduate School of Library and Information Studies, and the Department of Management Science and Information Systems in the College of Business Administration are collectively exploring the possibility of developing a new Master's in Information Resources Management to prepare students to respond to the challenge of improving the strategic management of information resources in business, government, and non-profit organizations. The program will be designed to give students the skills to cope with the proliferation and complexity of new information technologies and services. This proposed new program will be interdisciplinary and have three major focus areas: management of information systems; how people use information; and the systems used to acquire, manipulate and disseminate information.

Future Plans

  • A Ph.D. in Leadership and Social Policy to improve the capacity and effectiveness for social policy development, analysis, and evaluation by key stakeholders in Rhode Island, particularly in the public service, not-for-profit or volunteer sectors.
    Social Policy Children, Families and Communities
    Environmental Policy Marine and the Environment
    Trade and Employment Policy Enterprise and Advanced Technology
    Public Health Policy Health
  • Expansion of Independence Square to increase space for the current occupants (physical therapy and exercise science), new space for our planned program in occupational therapy, and new space to move Communicative Disorders to Independence Square (freeing space in Adams Hall). Also planned is space for child- and family-oriented programs including day care space for infants and toddlers, clinic space for clinical psychology and marriage and family therapy, and modest space for education and allied areas. The program focus will be on "early intervention," giving us the potential to work closely with State and voluntary agencies to develop cross-professional, integrated and family-focused programs of training and demonstration clinical and outreach programs.

Back to Top


GOAL #2 The Liberal Arts Core: Shaping the Future and Preserving the Past

The University will continue to provide liberal education both through a general education program and discipline-based undergraduate and graduate programs traditional in liberal learning.

Rationale

    The Liberal Arts Core provides a foundation for all the focus areas. It also has been described as parallel to the focus areas but differing in one significant and crucial way. Those disciplines which define and question our most fundamental values and their application and expression throughout civilization reside in the Liberal Arts Core. As is stated in the University of Rhode Island Mission Statement: "The University is committed to providing strong undergraduate programs to promote students' ethical development and capabilities as critical and independent thinkers." For the foreseeable future, liberal learning will remain as the central repository for the ideological values of the institution and higher education in general. At the University of Rhode Island, the traditional components of the Liberal Arts Core reside in the College of Arts and Sciences.

    With both graduate and undergraduate programs, the Liberal Arts Core consists of disciplines in their own right-the arts, humanities, social sciences, natural sciences and mathematics. In addition, the responsibility for the administration of the general education program is a primary responsibility of the College of Arts and Sciences, although other colleges are and must be involved. As such, general education is a major component of the philosophical underpinnings of the Liberal Arts Core. Finally, the Liberal Arts Core will be critical to the development of students by providing focused attention to the development of skills-communication, critical thinking, quantitative reasoning-as foundations for of lifelong learning as well as attention to habits of the mind and values.

Major Steps Taken to Date

  • As a result of the Program Contribution Analysis, 40 programs in Arts and Sciences (plus 65 others University-wide) that were seriously underenrolled and/or costly were suspended or flagged for further study, financial improvement and/or future suspension. In some cases, programs were merged such as Biology and Botany joining as Biological Sciences. In others, there is ongoing exploration of interdisciplinary work. The establishment of the Center for the Humanities and the John Hazen Sr. Center for Ethics and Public Service are two strong examples of collaborative ventures within the Liberal Arts Core.
  • Establishment of a B.S. in Marine Biology.
  • Biochemistry and Microchemistry merged into the Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Molecular Genetics.
  • Establishment of an Undergraduate Advisory Council.
  • Developing cross-college, interdisciplinary programs which merge one of the liberal arts with professional education.
  • Founding of the Cancer Prevention Research Center.
  • Formation of the Center for the Humanities with annual research and lecture programs undertaken by Humanities Fellows.
  • Rhode Island Partnership for Research on Women and Gender.

Change in Progress

The College of Arts and Sciences is in the midst of some shifts in its composition. For example:

  • The Geology Department has moved to the College of Resource Development (CRD) where its departmental mission and research strengths are better suited to the mission of that College and the associated Marine and Environmental Focus.
  • The Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Molecular Genetics (BMMG) is in the final stages of transferring from the College of Arts and Sciences to the College of Resource Development. (Target approval date is July 1, 1998.)
  • Transfer of the Department of Marine Affairs from the College of Arts and Sciences to the College of Resource Development is being considered. (Target approval date is July 1, 1998.)
  • The Interim Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences and a committee of faculty are exploring a Master's in Liberal Arts to provide a cost efficient program with the appeal of individually designed curricular requirements.
  • An undergraduate program, a B.A. in Public Relations, designed jointly by the Departments of Journalism and Communication Studies is in the final stages of approval. (Target approval date is July 1, 1998.)
  • Cooperative arrangements with RIC exist or are being explored in a number of liberal arts programs as follows:
    Undergraduate African and African-American Studies, B.A.
    Anthropology, B.A.
    French, B.A.
    Music, B.A., B.M.
    Women's Studies, B.A.
    Physics, B.A./B.S.
    Graduate Creative Writing (English), M.A./M.F.A.
    French, M.A.
    History, M.A.
    Music, M.M.
    Political Science, M.A.
    Theatre, M.F.A.
  • The development of focus areas and the concurrent exploration of disciplinary homes and/or partnerships outside of Arts and Sciences, particularly for many of the sciences, suggests the need for further exploration of structure. Additionally, disciplines within the College have a role to play in the development of partnerships and centers. For example, several new faculty positions serve both the Liberal Arts Core and the focus areas: maritime historian; organic chemist; marine vertebrate biologist.
  • The role of the arts and humanities remains of central concern for the Liberal Arts Core. At present, there are a number of initiatives to strengthen extant programs or foster new ones.
    • The Champlin Foundations funded an arts computer laboratory used for both instruction of arts students and for the general student who wishes to experiment with arts applications in technology.
    • Additional funding from the Champlin Foundations is supporting the transformation of Independence Hall into a site with several technology enhanced learning centers including a language laboratory with cutting edge video and computer interface to complement
    • Three computer laboratories-Arts, Journalism and the Communication Technology Center-are being placed under the management of Information and Instructional Technology Services (ITTS) to assure high-quality service for students and instructional staff.
    • The Fine Arts Center has undergone rehabilitation and upgrading in its theaters and concert hall. At present there is a development initiative for total rehabilitation of the main concert hall.
    • The Interim Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences and the Interim Dean for the College of Resource Development are working cooperatively on a multidisciplinary initiative in Environmental Biotechnology to capitalize on expertise available in both colleges.
    • Each year, the Center for the Humanities is appointing two Humanities Fellows.
    • The role of general education as the delivery system for liberal learning and associated basic skills is the subject of long and continued discussion.

      At present, the University College General Education Committee (UCGE) and the College of Arts and Sciences have decided to continue to support incremental change as the most fruitful way of improving general education.

      Possible incremental changes:

      • Increase Writing Across the Curriculum courses;
      • More clearly define objectives;
      • Integration of technology (universal access);
      • Change in course delivery (learning communities, course size).

Future Plans

    • The University of Rhode Island has an obligation to ensure reasonable access to a Liberal Education Core as part of its future. This means that the University must commit to maintaining a spectrum of disciplines and ensure that a quality general education program-supported by other colleges in addition to Arts and Sciences-gives these disciplines strong and central emphasis. The difficulty of shrinking resources makes it clear that the continued building of a strong Liberal Arts Core will depend on the ability of proponents of liberal learning to infuse all aspects of the curriculum with the values of general education. In addition, those disciplines that exist as part of the Liberal Arts Core must seek to create cooperative ventures in which real world applications serve learning, outreach and research. There are several successful models and proposed programs as follows:
      • A professor in the Department of Philosophy is working with the Coastal Partnership to address aesthetic issues of the coastline.
      • A professor in the Department of Philosophy teaches Medical Ethics at URI, Brown University and the Adult Correctional Institution.
      • A professor in the Department of German has successfully partnered the study of German with Engineering. This leads to the logical conclusion that other partnership initiatives with an international focus are desirable and doable. An Institute for German Engineering is under consideration as is a degree in Business and German.
      • A professor in the Department of Psychology has developed a research model for change which has broad applications in healthcare and industry. This professor's research is central to the Health Promotion Partnership and serves as a model for both quality and success in attracting extramural support.
      • A Master's in Communication Studies.
      • A Master's in Information Resources Management.
      • A four-year accelerated bachelor's/M.B.A. (Target date for degree proposal is July 1, 1999.)
      • An Interdisciplinary Master's in Liberal Arts.
      • A self-designed Interdisciplinary liberal arts degree.
      • Exploration of new combined majors. For example, environment and communications, major in arts management including internships, music and communications, and music and engineering (sound/recording engineering).
      • An interdisciplinary Film Studies major. (Target approval date is 1999.)
      • A leadership minor being developed by Student Affairs, University College and some departments in Arts and Sciences.
      • The Center for Humanities offers a major public program on a humanities subject each year.
    • Other cooperative programs between the professional schools, the focus areas or the partnetships will continue to evolve. For example, the burgeoning healthcare industry coupled with shifting demographics would point to a partnership between languages, Spanish in particular, and healthcare.

Resources

    • The Liberal Arts Core will always have a set of unique disciplines that attract majors for the discipline itself. The University must continue to support the option of a liberal arts education within an institution where there are several professional colleges. Because the immediate application of a liberal arts major is not always obvious, it will be important that the value and mission of the Liberal Arts Core be articulately defined. The mission of the Liberal Arts Core will evolve to reflect the changing mission of the University, the external environment, the expectations of current and future students and disciplinary considerations. Furthermore, the delivery of a general education curriculum containing core values must be offered by superb teachers using learner-centered pedagogy improved with the benefits of innovations in technology. (See Goal #3, Compelling Learning Experiences.)

Challenges

As was noted by the NEASC Accreditation Site Visit Team:

...there is a constructive tension between an institutional imperative of not trying to be all things to all people and the reality that there must be "cash cow" net contribution programs to help sustain a viable portfolio balance vis-à-vis high cost, distinctive and/or strong programs.

    • Maintaining that tension as a constructive force is a considerable test of the University's flexibility and inventiveness. In addition, the Accreditation Team referred to efforts to reform general education in recent years. The team suggested that the University "redouble its efforts to reinvigorate and enhance the General Education program."
    • Augment and adjust the Program Contribution Analysis to encourage interdisciplinary and collaborative programs and instruction.
    • Resolve questions regarding rewards and incentives surrounding the Liberal Arts Core and general education.
    • Maintain that which is the heart of a university-liberal learning. All students need to be stimulated and provoked by the great minds of the past and present in order to ensure that there will be a canon of great thought evolving in the future. A worthy university education must give students the opportunity to analyze, communicate, imagine, critique and think in-depth about issues of values and civic obligation. The study of ethics, philosophy, history, and literature among other disciplines traditional in colleges of liberal education are essential touchstones in the process of becoming a lifelong learner and responsible citizen.

    Back to Top



GOAL #3 — Compelling Learning Experiences in the Learner-Centered University

The University must continue to create compelling learning experiences to attract the excellent student, to reach out to the increasingly heterogeneous nature of the student body, and to stimulate the student discouraged by years of mediocre educational experiences or pedagogy incompatible with a his/her individual learning style. The need for powerful learning experiences exists at both the undergraduate and graduate levels of study. In addition, learning experiences must consider the continued need for diversity of age, race, ethnicity and gender as a desirable force for cultural and intellectual enrichment.

Rationale

The combined effect of higher costs for education, decreased public support in direct allocations to institutions or financial aid to students, and the application of the "latest and hottest" technological innovation will create an increasingly competitive environment for higher education. As the economy expands and grows more fluid in a global marketplace, students may choose to follow industry and study in other, possibly multiple, countries. The boundaries of citizenship and language may be of less significance in the selection of a university.

In addition, research on human learning has persuaded the educational community that there are a multitude of learning styles, all of them valid. Consequently, just as one cannot teach all students effectively with one style, one can no longer judge what is learned with a single testing technique. Research has shown that widely used standardized tests are biased toward particular socio-economic groups or one gender. This awareness has lead to national concern for other methods of determining learning outcomes as a more broadly based set of goals. There are both external expectations and internal advantages to having more documentation on learning outcomes. Externally, one has more data to support claims of quality, underscore needs and seek support. Internally, the work of programs and individuals is more effectively assessed. This allows for appropriate determination of where development initiatives are essential.

The University is moving toward a teaching- and learner-centered university in which faculty are given appropriate development opportunities to form or acquire new pedagogical techniques. In this environment a teacher sets the stage for experiential or active learning, for example, in which the student approaches problem solving as a partner with the teacher and other graduate and/or undergraduate students.

Creating much of the future educational scenario is guesswork, but one highly probable factor is that selection of a college experience(s) will have less to do with location and tradition and more to do with career tracking. Any institution struggling to maintain the status quo will lose its competitive edge leaving the innovative entrepreneurial institution to corner the market. At the same time, an institution that is solely directed toward preparing specialists/professionals to the exclusion of educating citizens as strong individualistic thinkers with solid analytical, critical, imaginative and communication skills risks losing the fundamental value of a university education.

Now more than ever, universities will be charged with providing compelling learning experiences to attract and retain students. The creation of these experiences cannot rest solely on what sells but what ensures quality for the continued development of an educated citizenry diverse in its ideological perspectives. In addition, universities will be required to address the needs of a more diverse population among its faculty, staff and students as well as preparing its students for interactions with a more diverse world in a global economy.

Major Steps Taken to Date

  • The introduction of URI 101, a course designed to introduce students to the world of higher education-its traditions and values as well as the nitty-gritty of library and computer facilities-is part of a larger initiative to focus on the quality of the freshmen year experience.

  • Development of partnerships in which students and faculty work in tandem on research projects. There are currently four partnerships within the focus areas (see Goal #1) that encourage undergraduate and graduate student involvement in research projects.

  • The Ph.D. in Education (offered jointly with Rhode Island College) serves as a strong link to area public schools as we recruit practicing educators and support their practice-based research.

Change in Progress

    • The most successful integration of the new paradigm is in the Partnership for the Coastal Environment with undergraduate and graduate students working in research teams with faculty and staff.
    • The University is exploring current applications of technology, distance learning and the virtual university. For example, to determine what of the new pedagogy that technology makes possible is desirable and doable for URI.
    • Universal access (ensuring that all students have a personal computer) has been identified as a top priority goal. (Target date is 2000.)
    • The continuing need for new perspectives is being explored in emerging fields that cross disciplines, such as cognitive studies.

      Programs such as African and African-American Studies and Women's Studies were originally developed in response to areas of subject matter, content and perspective that were lacking in the University's curriculum. They are now important independent disciplinary and interdisciplinary areas of study in their own right.

    • URI's teacher education programs are moving toward an outcomes perspective. With URI's leadership, implementation of the Rhode Island Beginning Teacher Standards, which will be used by the Rhode Island Department of Education to license beginning teachers, means that all Rhode Island institutions of higher education which prepare teachers must work to assure that recommended candidates meet the Beginning Teacher Standards.
    • There will be an RFP for additional partnerships within the focus areas. As these partnerships increase, so too will the number of faculty, staff and students participating in partnered learning and research.
    • Examples of areas in which the University currently is focusing its efforts to provide engaging learning experiences include the following:
      • International Study: through one-to-one exchanges, affiliations, and membership in various consortia offering international programs, about ten percent of each undergraduate class studies abroad each year. Current trends see increasing number of students seeking internships, experiences in developing countries, and study to complement their major.

        The Center for International Engineering-an interdisciplinary, dual degree program between the College of Engineering and College of Arts and Sciences-is now in the process of expanding by establishing an administrative and residential center for the University's International Program. A grant proposal is being submitted to the U.S. Department of Education to expand the program into Spanish languages and culture.

      • Service Learning: The University Year for Action Internship program is now more than twenty years old. Engaging in service to the community as a step toward modeling civic awareness and a sense of place in and responsibility to the larger community is now expected of all students in URI 101. The Feinstein Center for Service Learning is central to the plans for broadening the base of student involvement in public service.
      • URI 101: this course is designed to orient the traditional freshman but represents the beginning of learning experiences designed for a particular set of students. Beyond traditional academic learning, these courses will address issues of creating learning communities.
      • Honors Program: a new director of the program was appointed to build on past success, make revisions, expand offerings, enhance the use of technology, and address a growing population of students who excel.
      • Prestigious Academic Achievement: a faculty member is assigned to work with high achievement undergraduate and graduate students to obtain prestigious scholarships and fellowships such as the Truman, Eisenhower, Danforth, Fulbright, and Goldwater.
      • Diversity Initiatives: the opening of the Multicultural Center in the fall of 1999 will provide a focal point for learning opportunities surrounding issues of diversity.
      • Fundraising Initiatives: recent proposals to the Champlin Foundations have been coordinated to focus on institutional needs. For example, FY97 saw proposals focused on technology/computer-based learning laboratories. Proposals in FY98 centered on laboratory improvements.
      • Faculty Technology Fellows: to ensure creative uses of technology, the first group of Faculty Technology Fellows, comprised of 40 faculty from all colleges, participated in extensive training and ongoing sharing of classroom technologies to enhance learning. The Instructional Development Program (IDP) and Information and Instructional Technology Services (ITTS) jointly sponsored the Fellows Program.
      • Information Gathering/Literacy: to prepare undergraduates for today's information age, the library is developing a new undergraduate course in information gathering and understanding.
      • Learning Communities: these communities take many different forms. All share the goals of providing coherence and academic support to students. Examples:

          Enrollment of 25 students simultaneously in a section of composition and in a large section of psychology and encouragement of them to form academic support and study groups among themselves;

          Bring together three or four courses around a theme and include team teaching, common assignments and collaborative learning across disciplines.

      • Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered: support of new teaching and learning initiatives by the IDP, the Faculty Technology Fellows Program, and the Feinstein Faculty Fellows Program.
      • Experiential Learning: development and implementation of models that bring both undergraduate and graduate students into research projects where experiential learning is a critical component of their experience. An example is the Coastal Partnership which involved 48 undergraduates and 18 graduate students in AY97-98.
      • Internships: The UYA internship program continues to grow so that now almost ten percent of URI students participate in a semester-long, full-time internship program. A growing number of UYA-affiliated programs are available in international settings.
      • Capstone Experience: the majority of degree-granting programs require students to complete a final project which serves as the definitive expression and demonstration of learning-both theory and application-in their undergraduate major.
      • Enrichment Opportunities for Faculty: supported by Faculty Development Funds, the Office of the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs arranged for several members of the Department of Natural Resources Science to attend a conference in February of 1998 entitled "Faculty Work in Learning Organizations." They returned with several ideas for expanding experiential learning and addressing concerns of workload and obligations specific to the traditional department structure. The Office of the Provost is using its portion of the Faculty Development Fund to support a number of similar enrichment opportunities for faculty.

       

Future Plans

    • With rapidly changing demographics, it will continue to be important to provide immersion or entry-level experiences to orient students who arrive with very different levels of preparedness. Due to the inadequacy of previous educational and environmental experiences, some of these students will be seriously challenged by the most basic of university entry level work. One type of challenge is the passive, non-engaged student because as the expectation for higher education has increased, student engagement has decreased. This makes active learning all the more important. At the same time, however, other students will be ready for more advanced and challenging learning opportunities. As the age of college students becomes more varied, the potential for entering students capable of attacking intellectually rigorous subjects in one area and needing supplemental work in another poses an even greater challenge.
      • Flexible and imaginative curricular offerings will be needed in all programs.
      • Curricular offerings designed for different styles of learning; for example, right and left brain, emotional, visual learning, and gender-based learning styles will be necessary.
      • Faculty trained in new learner-centered education techniques and technology applications will be critical to the success and stability of the University.
      • URI's proposed School of Education will organize faculty into program teams to ensure the quality of student learning outcomes.
      • An emphasis on increasing and sustaining diversity will be central to the validity of creating a community that mirrors the society our University community is committed to serve.
      • The Library faculty will be engaged directly in the University's teaching program through development of information studies courses which are linked directly with course work in majors.
      • The model International Engineering Program will expand to include other languages. Engineering programs combining French and Spanish as well as German, and business majors incorporating languages are already in the planning stages. Other examples of incorporating languages "across the curriculum" and international study will follow. For example Nursing/Spanish and/or Portuguese, Pharmacy/Spanish, and Human Science & Services/Spanish.
      • Offering at least one critical, non-western language through the intermediate level will be considered.
      • In order to increase our undergraduate population of international students and be competitive for international graduate students, the University will consider offering English as a Foreign Language.
      • The Office of International Education will work with faculty to expand short-term international programs and projects, particularly for lower-division students.
      • Many faculty are engaged in research internationally, but their international expertise is not always reflected in undergraduate courses. There are several needs the University plans to address: 1) to centralize information about who is working where so we have country-specific information for all purposes; 2) to find ways to infuse "international perspectives" and "cross-cultural understanding" across the curriculum.
      • The new Vice Provost for Information Services and Dean of the University Libraries has led the University in an initiative known as "99 by 99" - a commitment to have 99% of the campus wired and networked by 1999.
      • Universal access or the availability of computers for all students is being considered.
      • Green Hall will be refurbished to provide a combination of enrollment services to students in one location, including the Offices of Financial Aid, Admissions, Registrar and Bursar. While this may seem tangential to pedagogical issues, it sends an important message to our students about the University's concern for their welfare and helps to bond them to the community.
      • Theme Dormitories or living communities are being planned in dormitories based on academic foci and/or quality of life and lifestyle concerns. Examples of such dormitories include: Wellness, German Language and Engineering, Honors.
      • Flexible models of delivering the curriculum are being considered. For example, length and time of courses, increased use of internships, and increasing diversity in the age, cultural needs and personal lifestyles of the student body.
      • Summer Session will be enhanced. Areas under discussion include expanded credit-bearing offerings, co-curricular and extra-curricular opportunities, and a more active cultural and intellectual environment. (A decrease in tuition is being implemented in the Summer of 1998 to allow broader access of summer offerings to students.)

Resources

    • Low faculty-student ratio learning experiences and more numerous educational services cost more. The goal is to balance the possible savings of, for example, the virtual university model-with classes offered long distance through, for example, PictureTel or the Internet-with the labor intensive work of other learner-centered experiences. The University will need to be vigilant about seeking revenue-building activities to offset the cost of more expensive but attractive and successful learning models.

Challenges

    • Maintain quality. An important factor in meeting this challenge is strong and continuing faculty development. Faculty must be given the opportunity to prepare for a learner-centered environment. Often new faculty are more driven by a research model which is not inclusive of undergraduates in general. The university must strengthen faculty development-and match these goals with faculty reward structures-in order to ensure success as a learner-centered educational institution.
    • Strong support for effective faculty use of technology in teaching is important. With the rise of the virtual university, it is conceivable that elite private institutions and highly accessible public institutions will have the potential to offer the same courses.
    • Change will be constant and require evolving plans with flexible structures and a capacity for rapid response. The determining factor in maintaining a reputation for quality will rest on several factors such as one or more of the following:
      • Curricular innovation;
      • Opportunities for faculty training in experiential and learner-centered pedagogy;
      • Marketing;
      • Co-ops, internships, study abroad (or in space, in oceans);
      • Development of and support for learner-centered curricula and pedagogy;
      • Affordability of course "packages";
      • Hardware and other techno-gadgetry;
      • Infusion of diversity into the curriculum;
      • The recruitment and retention of faculty, staff and students are critical to the cultural and intellectual richness essential to a high-quality learning environment;
      • Rewards and incentives surrounding development of innovative pedagogy.

        Back to Top

GOAL #4 — The Research Mission: Growth and Application

Promote growth in the University's research enterprise consistent with our status as the State's flagship research institution of higher education.

Rationale

      As stated in the Mission Statement, our land-grant legacy assigns to the University a vital role in knowledge creation and knowledge application. This is most tangibly embodied in the University's research programs, programs we are focusing now in the four focus areas as well as the Liberal Arts Core, and the associated graduate degree programs.

      Within the public sector, the University is the only institution with an explicit research mission. In addition, compared to other institutions in the State with a research mission, the University is unique in having the role to create knowledge which serves the particular needs of the citizens of the State. Research for its own sake, therefore, is complemented by research which fosters economic development and addresses the particular challenges of this State and region.

      Growth of the research and graduate mission of the University is evidenced by the growth in extramural funding for its faculty's research activities. Since 1966-67, this support has increased by a factor of 12 as displayed below.

      Research Dollars:


		1966-67      $  3,485,128

		1974-75      $  9,970,226

		1984-85      $ 26,491,691

		1996-97      $ 42,635,561

      Graduate Students:


		1966-67	

		1974-75	

		1984-85      $ 2,874

		1996-97      $ 3,125

      Graduate Degree Programs:


  
		1966-67	

		1974-75	

		1984-85      $   115

		1996-97      $    82

      The University is committed to achieving Carnegie Research I classification. The basic requirement for this classification is directly correlated with the amount of federal grant money received in a given fiscal year. The value of achieving this distinction, however, goes far beyond a simple numeric classification. In essence, it would place the University among the nation's top research institutions. This in turn would enhance URI's reputation which would serve the institution well when seeking funding from private foundations and corporations in addition to federal sources.

Major Steps Taken to Date

    • Merged the Graduate School and the Research Office and established the position of Vice Provost for Graduate Studies, Research and Outreach and appointed the first incumbent.
    • Reconfigured the associate deanship in the Graduate School by creating two half-time positions with each of these also funded in part by the Research Office. This has helped integrate the work of the Graduate School more completely and permitted a more efficient division of labor.
    • Formulated and widely distributed "Principles for the Allocation of Graduate Assistants." The long-standing distribution of GAs was, and continues to be, revised to reflect these principles.
    • Established four partnerships (Sensors and Surface Technology, Public Health Partnership in Infectious Disease Control, Partnership for the Coastal Environment, and the Health Promotion Partnership) to investigate multidisciplinary meta-issues in a teaching/research collaborative.
    • An example of this approach is provided by the Partnership for the Coastal Environment which has involved graduate and undergraduate students in over 50 identifiable research projects with faculty and professionals from the Providence Gas Company and the Department of Environmental Management.

Change in Progress

    • Developing evaluation metrics for the first four partnerships which are coming to the end of their three-year funding cycle. (Target date: Spring 1998.)
    • Solicitation of proposals for a second round of partnership funding during Spring 1998.
    • Development of a new intellectual property policy in cooperation with the Vice Provost for Graduate Studies, Research and Outreach and the Council for Research. (Target date: July 1998.)
    • Revision of the overhead policy to provide resources in the Office of the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs to support research. (ongoing)
    • Formulation of a new disclosure statement to provide clear guidance for researchers regarding university policies. (Target date: July 1998.)
    • Continuing to refine the allocation of GAs consistent with the established "Principles for the Allocation of Graduate Assistants."
    • Proposing modifications to the tuition policies for out-of-state graduate students who serve as GAs and RAs to bring these policies into compliance with federal agency funding limitations and to make them consistent with those at peer institutions.

Future Plans

    • Continue efforts to achieve extramural funding levels consistent with a Carnegie Research I classification.
    • Increase support for the Council for Research.
    • Co-locate the graduate school and research office for enhancement of leadership oversight and functional efficiencies.
    • Expand the undergraduate research program and related opportunities to enhance undergraduate educational experiences.
    • Institute a summer graduate research fellowship program.
    • Allocate new graduate assistantships to support focus areas.
    • Develop University-wide, coordinated recruitment for graduate programs using the Web as well as more traditional methods.
    • Provide support for the University Libraries sufficient to meet the demands of the continuing research activities. This includes personnel and capital resources to meet the new technological advances in access to supplement the traditional form of collection ownership.
    • Join Internet II to provide the level of Internet connectivity appropriate and necessary for our research enterprise. A $350,000 NSF grant was secured recently to help with the costs of this.
    • Reallocate research resources toward the focus areas as identified in Goal #1.

      The University has some resources which can be redirected to aid the research effort within the focus areas which could make it distinctive and productive. These resources include some personnel resources. The partnerships and the funds associated with them, and equipment matching funds can strengthen the focus areas if judiciously deployed. These need to be supplemented by additional funds from State allocations and industry to maintain and augment the laboratory and equipment infrastructure.

    • Define within each focus area several existing or potential research programs to act as signature programs.

      Key programs must be identified in each focus area which will attract students and produce national and international recognition. Research programs must have some regional uniqueness and, at the least, the potential to garner government and industrial support and attract both undergraduate and graduate students. Examples to date include the addition of positions in the Cancer Prevention Research Consortium, the development of research capacity associated with the National Center on Public Education and Social Policy.

    • Develop and articulate the role of research as teaching.

      The graduate model of mentoring student researchers in scholarly activities is one of the highest forms of teaching. More involvement of undergraduates in the excitement of leading edge scholarship and research can enliven the entire educational enterprise and attract students from throughout the country and the world. Again, we would refer to the example of the Partnership for the Coastal Environment which has involved almost 50 students in its research initiatives.

Resources

    • Adequate matching funds. Increasingly, public funding agencies are demanding significant institutional matches, usually in explicit, tangible form. To be an important player in many funding arenas requires resources to meet these demands.
    • Research infrastructure. Compliance, pre- and post-award financial control, adequate support services, and research-friendly employment practices are all insufficient to meet the stated goal of achieving Research I prominence.
    • Facilities. The appropriate level of facilities necessary to support various programs including health, safety and EPA standards, as well as systems to support grants accounting must be identified.
    • More resources are needed for start-up packages for new faculty.
    • New ways to provide access to scholarly information in face of rapidly rising cost of scholarly journals.
    • More personnel resources are needed to support research programs and the research office.
    • Transfer research and grants accounting from the Vice President for Business and Finance to the Office of the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs.
    • Technology and Internet II capability. A campus backbone which is sufficiently robust to support Internet II throughout the campus is vital. In addition, technology support services must be sufficiently abundant to service the research community.

Challenges

    • Meeting the resource needs a land-grant (and sea-grant and urban-grant) university will require more plentiful public support. The needs of the research enterprise cannot be met from tuition revenues derived primarily from undergraduate tuition.

      This challenge is exacerbated by the fact that the State expects the University to provide the research expertise necessary to the healthy functioning of the State and its economic growth. Research and outreach are more than functions implied by our land-grant mission; they are fundamental expectations of the State.

    • Position the University as a premier flagship university by moving to Research I status.
    • Identification of new sources of revenue to support graduate education and research equipment and facilities.
    • Cultivate more business partnerships.
    • Consider the establishment of an incubation center to turn research ideas into viable businesses.
    • The institution must work to resolve questions regarding rewards and incentives surrounding research.

      Back to Top

GOAL #5 — Outreach and Economic Development: A Core Component of the University's Obligation

 

As the only land-, sea and urban-grant university, the University of Rhode Island is charged with a unique obligation to the citizens of the State, the region and the nation.

Rationale

      As the State's flagship land-grant institution, URI has a tradition of outreach through the long-standing model of the premier outreach program, Cooperative Extension. Historically, outreach applications were limited to agriculture and, later, extended to the disciplines located in the College of Resource Development. The decision was made to enhance and heighten outreach activities in quantity and quality as a means of enriching the profile of the University.

      The current concept of outreach places it centrally as the meeting place of research, teaching and service, and good outreach often encompasses all three. The positive outcome of this is that outreach can result in more expeditious development of partnerships that surface for the duration of the outreach project. At its completion, the faculty, staff and students are "reabsorbed" into other projects or continuing partnerships of which outreach was one component. In addition, the place of outreach in the public university moving into the next millennium is to serve as an economic engine contributing to the economic development of the State. While the details of the recently awarded Slater Technology grants have been discussed under the focus areas and research, those initiatives stand firmly within the purview of outreach.

Major Steps Taken to Date

    • The Blue Ribbon Committee for Outreach appointed by the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs studied outreach at several other land-grant universities. Based on national trends and successful models, the decision was made to recognize and institutionalize two distinct tracks for outreach at URI.
      1. University-wide outreach which provides interaction between and among internal and external public and/or private constituencies to address problems, undertake initiatives and create dynamic partnerships.

        Examples include Sea Grant, the Office of Marine Programs, Performing Arts Touring Programs, and Health Promotion Partnership programs.

      2. Cooperative Extension (CE) which involves a partnership between the State and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). CE programs are defined by the terms of the agreement between the State and USDA in the awarding of CE funds.

        There are six program areas for which CE funding is available: Landscape Horticulture, Aquaculture and Fisheries, Food Safety and Nutrition, Natural Resources and the Environment, Community Economic Development, and Youth and Family Development

    • When research and graduate education were combined under the purview of one vice provost, outreach was included as part of the administrative title and assignment. A Vice Provost for Graduate Studies, Research and Outreach was appointed. This gives outreach a "place at the table" where institutional priorities are set.
    • An Interim Director of CE was appointed with the mandate to expand CE outreach activities beyond the College of Resource Development in order to capitalize on the strengths of the faculty in all six of the program areas. For the first time in URI's history, there are faculty with CE assignments and CE support outside of the College of Resource Development.

Change in Progress

    • The Interim Director of Cooperative Extension recently submitted a report outlining recommendations for the CE office. The Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs has adopted the proposed plan and is moving ahead to fill the position of Director of Academic Outreach and Director of Cooperative Extension. (Target date: July 1, 1998)
    • The Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs is working with the Vice Provost for Graduate Studies, Research and Outreach and the Interim CE Director to define the University-wide role of outreach. The current working definition and expectation of outreach (culled, in part, from UMASS, from the Michigan State University, and from the Blue Ribbon Committee on Outreach at URI) is as follows:

      Academic outreach is a form of scholarship that cuts across teaching, research, and public service. It involves generating, transmitting, applying, and preserving knowledge for the direct benefit of external audiences. Academic outreach connects the University in mutually beneficial relationships with external audiences in ways that are consistent with university and unit missions.

    • There are numerous areas of the University involved in significant outreach efforts. A few examples follow:
      • Performances, exhibits and concerts in the Fine Arts Center attract over 80,000 people each year and hundreds more are served by touring performances or ensembles.
      • The Department of Textiles, Fashion Merchandising and Design received grants to date, catalogue, repair and exhibit historic quilts throughout the State.
      • The Department of Economics has several faculty who advise on matters of economic growth and consumer interest in print and electronic media.
      • Faculty in the Department of Food Science and Nutrition advise individuals and healthcare organizations on dietary matters and fast food restaurants on bacteria control.
      • Students, staff and faculty in Exercise Science work with recovering heart attack patients in a cardiac rehabilitation program.
      • Students, staff and faculty in the College of Pharmacy run special programs for seniors to monitor medication interaction.

Future Plans

    • The Table of Organization places outreach and CE under the Vice Provost for Graduate Studies, Research and Outreach. A search is underway to appoint a Director of Academic Outreach and Director of Cooperative Extension who will report to that Vice Provost.
    • Faculty and staff will be encouraged to participate more widely in outreach activities as outreach activities create more partnerships with the "real world."
    • Extant outreach activities will be identified and marketed more effectively to take advantage of high profile activities.
    • The continued growth of partnerships, internships, co-op activities and new initiatives such as paid workstudy leaves will encourage students to participate in outreach activities.
    • The Office of the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs will work with the campus community to define and refine outreach activities and their place within expectations for faculty.
    • Establish one stop shopping for outreach with a web page and proactive establishment of external partnerships. (Target date: Fall 1998)
    • A long-term goal is more effective and coordinated marketing and packaging of outreach activities.
    • Tie outreach to the focus areas:
      • Marine and the Environment-aquaculture, biotech, water analysis;
      • Health-CPRC, cardiac rehabilitation, elderly medications; smoking, weight management and elderly health teams;
      • Children, Families and Communities-homeless, child care, K-12 education;
      • Enterprise and Advanced Technology-agriculture, manufacturing.

Resources

    • In the traditional CE model, the State and its citizens have come to expect services in return for their tax dollar. This is exacerbated by the fact that the State expects the University to provide research expertise basic to the healthy functioning of the State and its economic growth. In fact, both research and outreach are more than functions implied by the land-grant mission; they are fundamental expectations of the State. Efforts must be made to monitor the expansion of outreach so as not to create expectations that exceed available resources. Furthermore, outreach models should include extramural funding through traditional sources-government, foundations, USDA CE support-or innovative partnerships with dollars equaling expertise, or the bartering of services.
    • The expansion of outreach will require investment in sufficient staff to monitor progress and cost. CE reporting requires additional staff to manage those projects and budgets. The combining of all outreach efforts in one place will enhance the ability of the University to demonstrate benefits and publicize successes. However, the initial investment will have to be made in adequate staffing.

Challenges

    • The Outreach Committee gathered data and found fairly extensive outreach activities already in effect at URI but not clearly identified as such. A clear definition of outreach and expectations for faculty, staff and students in this area is necessary. The administration and the Director of Academic Outreach and Director of Cooperative Extension have a major educational task to accomplish before the University-wide outreach model will become part of the institution's identity.
    • Faculty, staff and students will need clear guidelines regarding rewards and incentives as they apply to outreach. For faculty, there is the question the weight and value of outreach for promotion and/or tenure.
    • Outreach must be recognized and designed as a truly cross-cutting activity in order that the benefits will become most obvious in a learner-centered environment where experiential learning takes place in the field.
    • Outreach needs to be viewed as a University-wide obligation and part of the University's mission.

Back to Top

URI Logo

Copyright © 1999
University of Rhode Island

Disclaimer


For more information about this site, email cygnet@uri.edu.
File last updated: Monday, June 14, 1999

The University is an affirmative action/equal opportunity employer. 
All rights reserved.