University of Rhode Island

Academic Plan

and

University Response to Board of Governors’ Priorities

1999-2002

Response to Board Goals and Priorities for 1999-2002

 

Priority #1 -- Access and Affordability

As the State’s only publicly supported research university, the University of Rhode Island is charged with providing an opportunity to state residents for undergraduate and graduate study at a land grant, research university. In order to offer a wide range of programs and bring additional diversity to the academic community, the University also enrolls a significant number of out of state students. Because of the University’s mission, the admissions policy is "selective" in that only students judged prepared for university-level study are granted regular admissions. In response, however, to the charge of accessibility and affordability and recognizing the increasing educational diversity of potential students, the University maintains several programs for special populations and has started several new initiatives as well. In addition to its traditional menu of financial aid programs, the University has the following special programs aimed at increasing access and affordability.

The University has worked with the Office of Higher Education to keep its tuition and fee rates affordable and competitive. Increases have averaged just over 3% in the last five years compared with significantly higher increases in the eighties.

Key Initiatives (Ongoing)

Students in the program must maintain a C+ average, attend workshops, participate in support programs and have a good attendance record. The parents must support the students in these activities. The University guarantees those students who fulfill these commitments a place in the freshman class. University representatives work with the students during their high school careers to ensure that they select the appropriate courses and learn about the University and its opportunities.

 

 

Indicators of Success for 1999-2000

The University is enjoying two major shifts as a result of efforts to increase accessibility and affordability: 1) the Centennial Scholars Program; and 2) the emphasis on diversity. For the past few years the Centennial Scholars academic profile has reflected an SAT average of 1240 and a top 13% high school class rank. Our Centennial Scholars have significantly influenced the academic culture in the classroom and on the campus. The percentage of minority students in incoming freshman classes has risen from 10.3% in 1995 to 11.4% in 1999. This increase in diversity is creating a richer cultural environment complementary to the enriched intellectual environment. These two factors frequently overlap in the activities and accomplishments of groups and individuals.

Priority #2 -- Fiscal Planning [To be included in President’s Management Letter.]

 

Priority #3 -- K-12 and Teacher Preparation Reform

 

As part of our mission, we seek to integrate the strengths of the University with those of our partners in schools, communities, and others in the private and public sectors and to ensure that through teaching, research, policy analysis, and service, all children and families are fully prepared to succeed in school, be effective life-long learners, and participate in a democratic society, its institutions, and the economy. We prepare educators to serve diverse populations and communities. Further, through collaborative research and service, we seek to advance knowledge and understanding across our discipline to inform policy, improve practice and thereby strengthen schools, communities, and all levels of educational and related developmental programs and policy. To realize its mission and vision the University’s School of Education has been engaged in reform and re-engineering of the unit’s teaching, service, and research efforts. These efforts include:

Key Initiatives (1999-2002)

 

Indicators of Success for 1999-2000

 

Priority #4 -- Technology

Due in large measure to the funding support provided by the 1998 Technology Bond Initiative, the University has undertaken a wide range of new and/or augmented initiatives to meet the technology needs of the University community. The ongoing costs to refresh the infrastructure and maintain it have yet to be addressed fully. With the bond funding slated to end in 2001, this challenge will have to be faced soon.

Key Initiatives (1999-2002)

 

Indicators of Success for 1999-2000

 

Priority #5 -- Quality Assurance and Outcomes Assessment

In continuing our work on quality assurance and outcomes assessment, the University has redesigned its program review process now called Program Quality Review. Sixteen programs are currently being reviewed. This review will complement the Program Contribution Analysis which analyses the relative cost of programs. Results of these reviews will include recommendations and a plan for their implementation.

Working toward a University-wide assessment program, the Office of the Provost has sponsored a series of mini-grants in the development of assessment models.

 

Key Initiatives (1999-2002)

Department of Physical Therapy

"Incorporating Portfolios into Physical Therapy Clinical Education"

College of the Environment and Life Sciences and the Graduate School of Oceanography

"Assessment of Educational Outcomes Associated with Problem-Based Teams"

School of Education

"Development of a Web-Based Portfolio System"

Department of Biological Sciences

"Grade Tracking of Former BIO 113 Students"

College of Human Science and Services

"Outcomes Assessment in Human Services"

College of Engineering

"Objectives and Outcomes in an Assessment Process" (Accreditation related)

 

Indicators of Success for 1999-2000

The challenge of quality assurance and assessment is multifold. In addition to the University-wide accreditation by the New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC), the University undergoes rigorous external evaluation from a number of specialized discipline specific accrediting groups such as the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET). The challenge is to develop models which speak to the unique goals and methodologies of individual disciplines. The promising aspect of these challenges is that there is a proliferation of assessment model development apparent at the department, college, focus area and university level.

In accordance with the suggestions from the NEASC Accreditation Team, the University continues to develop and institute outcomes placed assessment instruments for programs.

 

Program Projections

The University continues to strive for excellence in all programs, to align activities with resources, and to view programs in terms of focus areas:

1) "Marine and Environmental" offerings; 2) Offerings related to "Enterprise and Advanced Technology;" 3) programs addressing issues related to "Children, Families and Communities;" 4) "Health and Health Promotion" programs; and 5) the "Liberal Arts Core."

Note: This section of the report contains those items which will require Board of Governors' formal approval. Readers of earlier plans will notice that the list presented here is shorter than ones presented in earlier plans. That results from internal review and the revisiting of program proposals as they come forward. As indicated in our earlier plans, such documents must remain dynamic and provide for taking advantage of unforeseen opportunities as well as for reassessing information presented in earlier iterations. This section does not include information usually forwarded under the category of "Notices of Change." Proposed changes of department names, for example, are not included in the following list. Also not included are curricular changes within programs (minor changes in degree requirements within a given program or incremental changes in the General Education Program) since such changes are part of the ongoing dynamic nature of an institution of higher learning and usually do not require Board approval.

 

A. Proposed Stage

B. Planning Stage

 

C. Concept Stage

 

 

Addressing Other Institutional-Based Priorities and Possibilities

The University continues to work to maintain and enhance our high-quality academic programs and provide strong support for our researchers. The following remain among the institutional priorities. Some of these broad initiatives may result in programs which will require Board approval. Others are designed to support existing activities and respond to a projected increase in enrollment.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Office of the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs

March 2000