Allred, K. G., Mallozzi, J. S., Matsui, F., & Raia, C. P. (1997). The influence of anger and compassion on negotiation performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70 (3), 175-187.
Avery, D. (2003). Reactions to diversity in recruitment advertising - are differences black and white? Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (4), 672-679.
Avery, D. R., & McKay, P. F. (2006). Target practice: An organizational impression management approach to attracting minority and female job applicants. Personnel Psychology, 59 (1), 157-187.
Bond, J. T., Thompson, C., Galinsky, E., & Prottas, D. (2003). Generation and gender in the workplace . New York : American Business Administration.
Brown, D. J., Cober, R. T., Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (2002, April). Racial tolerance and reactions to diversity information in job advertisements . Paper presented at the 17th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Toronto , Canada .
Cox, T. H., Jr., & Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive, 5 (3), 45-56.
Girves, J. E., Zepeda, Y., & Gwathmey, J. K. (2005). Mentoring in a post-affirmative action world. Journal of Social Issues, 61 (3), 449-479.
Goldberg, C. B. (2005). Relational demography and similarity attraction in interview assessments and subsequent offer decisions: Are we missing something? Group & Organization Management, 30 (6), 597-624.
Goldberg, C. & Cohen, D. J. (2004). Walking the walk and talking the talk: Gender differences in the impact of interviewing skills on applicant assessments. Group & Organization Management, 29 (3), 369-384.
Greening, D. W., & Turban, D. B. (2000). Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attractive a quality workforce. Business & Society, 39 , 254-280.
Kiefer, A., Sekaquaptewa, D., & Barczyk, A. (2006). When appearance concerns make women look bad: Solo status and body image concerns diminish women's academic performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42 (1), 78-86.
Kinicki, A. J., & Lockwood, C. A. (1985). The interview process: An examination of factors recruiters use in evaluating job applicants. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 26 (2), 117-125.
Kray, L. J., Galinsky, A. D., & Thompson, L. (2002). Reversing the gender gap in negotiations: An exploration of stereotype regeneration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87 (2), 386-409.
McNab, S. M., & Johnston, L. (2002). The impact of Equal Employment Opportunity statements in job advertisements on applicants' perceptions of organizations. Australian Journal of Psychology, 54 (2), 105-109.
Murphy, N. A., Hall, J. A., & LeBeau, L. S. (2001). Who's smart? Beliefs about the expression of intelligence in social behavior. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 25 , 34-42.
Neimann, Y. F., & Dovidio, J. F. (1998). Relationship of solo status, academic rank, and perceived distinctiveness to job satisfaction of racial/ethnic minorities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83 (1), 55-71.
Petersen, L., & Dietz, J. (2005). Prejudice and enforcement of workforce homogeneity as explanations for employment discrimination. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35 (1), 144-159.
Roberson, Q. M., Collins, C. J., & Oreg, S., (2005). The effects of recruitment message specificity on applicant attraction to organizations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19 (3), 319-339.
Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 (3), 629-645.
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77 (5), 1004-1010.
Sacco, J. M., Scheu, C. R., Ryan, A. M., & Schmitt, N. (2003). An investigation of race and sex similarity effects in interviews: A multilevel approach to relational demography. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 852-865.
Schrodt, P., Cawyer, C. S., & Sanders, R. (2003). An examination of academic mentoring behaviors and new faculty members' satisfaction with socialization and tenure and promotion processes. Communication Education, 52 (1), 17-29.
Smith, D. G., Turner, C. S., Osei-Kofi, N., & Richards, S. (2004). Interrupting the usual: Successful strategies for hiring diverse faculty. Journal of Higher Education, 75 (2), 133-160.
Smith, D. G., Wolf, L. E., & Busenberg, B. (1996). Achieving faculty diversity: Debunking the myths. A research report of a national study . Washington , DC : Association of American Colleges and University.
The National Academies (2007). Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering . Washington , DC : Author.
Thomas, K. M., & Wise, P. G. (1999). Organizational attractiveness and individual differences: Are diverse applicants attracted by different factors? Journal of Business and Psychology, 13 (3), 375-390.
Thompson, M. & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2002). When being different is detrimental: Solo status and the performance of women and racial minorities. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy (ASAP), 2 (1), 183-203.
Turner, C. S. V. (2002). Diversifying the Faculty: A Guidebook for Search Committees . Washington , DC : American Association of Colleges and Universities.
Uhlmann, E. L., & Cohen, J. L. (2005). Constructed criteria: Redefining merit to justify discrimination. Psychological Science, 16 (6), 474-480.
van Ommeren, J., de Vries, R. E., Russo, G., & van Ommeren, M. (2005). Context in selection of men and women in hiring decisions: Gender composition of the applicant pool. Psychological Reports, 96 (2), 349-360.
Williamson, I. O., Lepak, D. P., & King, J. (2003). The effect of company recruitment web site orientation on individuals' perceptions of organizational attractiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63 , 242-263.
Zusman, R. R., & Landis, R. S. (2002). Applicant preference for web-based versus traditional job postings. Computers in human behavior, 18 , 285-296.