Affirmative Action Home Page


Common Agenda 2000-2001

Cultural Diversity

July 12, 2000, Memorial Union

How Do We Measure The Cultural Climate/ Diversity?


       Convened by: Guy McCombs
       Reported by: Gary Boden

 

Participants
Guy McCombs Lynne Derbyshire Donna Figueroa Kimberly Steger
Gary Boden Paul Richmond Ed Givens John Soares
Mark Davis Mary MacDougall Ayn Plant Judith Swift
Linda Palazzo Abu Bakr Stephen Myces

 

Problems/Issues:
  • Why measure the Cultural Climate at URI ?.
  • What keeps people from wanting to measure the Climate ? a) once we find the need, then there is a lot of work to do, b) time commitments to other things, c) climate constantly changes, so we need a constant monitoring system & person.
  • Groups and depts. are not communicating their own diversity efforts broadly enough.
  • Efforts have been episodic and isolated. Lack of a sense of an overall University process.
  • What is the comfort level with integration ?
  • Unity is lacking. There is no "glue" uniting all the diverse groups.
  • What makes up cultural competence ? What pieces need to be measured ?
  • Lack of mentoring or supporting of students away from home for the first time can lead to problems of cultural interaction. Mom and Dad used to steer the student the right way, but now there is nobody to turn to. Talent Development fills this mentoring function, but non-TD students don’t get this.
  • We may be thinking too monolithically (e.g., racial group) and not seeing our connections in many other categories.
  • We just need to take risks, regardless of whether we think we will be rejected.

 

Discussion Highlights:
  • The assessment process is already underway. More input needed to make it the best possible.
  • Faculty training in cultural competence is necessary.
  • Need to determine all the things that should be measured and are important (example: civility. How do we measure "politeness" ?)
  • URI has some diversity, but it is skewed toward certain groups and not wide-spread.
  • URI needs to bridge the gap between a student’s state of dependence and eventual independence.
  • Students don’t seem to want to have more control over their environment. Do they think they can make any difference ? There is disinterest and lack of passion about issues.
  • Things to measure: ask if people are doing things to increase their appreciation of other cultures.
  • The white male perspective is needed as well as the minority perspective.
  • Campus hierarchy is an important element of campus divisiveness. How do people see themselves fitting in ? Class status is associated with perceived sensitivity to cultural issues. Barriers are broken by personal interaction – this is the start of relationships.

 

Action Steps/Recommendations:
  • Better utilization of PDLOT resources.
  • Coordinate the different diversity initiatives
  • Release time for employees to attend the cultural compenancy classes.
  • When developing assessment questions, include all groups including the majority.
  • Include student organizations in developing the assessment instruments.