Syllabus

ENG 472: SHAKESPEARE

Spring 2003

 

Professor Judith Swift

Office: 874-4809 E-mail: jswift@uri.edu

Office Hours: Monday 2-3, Thursday 1-3 and by appointment

Office Location: 308A Independence Hall

Tuesday, 3:30-4:20 p.m.; Thursday , 3:30-5:10 p.m.

Materials and syllabus: www.uri.edu/artsci/com/swift

Undergraduate Writing Consultant: Kathryn MacDonald

kmac9330@postoffice.uri.edu

Course Description: Students will join with the professor in exploring the works of William Shakespeare and marveling at his genius while at the same time gaining an appreciation for the gift of stagecraft inherent in his structuring of scenes and acts. Works read will include histories, tragedies and comedies. In addition, film adaptations will be viewed to enhance understanding of the plays when brought to life as well as the cultural context of the period in which the adaptations were produced. Attention will be paid to the meaning of the plays within Elizabethan and Jacobean culture but also consider their timeliness in other periods of history up to and including the present. Works will be explored as literature while the class remains ever mindful of the canon as plays intended to be performed. Students will be expected to post thoughts, questions, and observations to an ongoing discussion on a listserv designed to enhance class discussion. Team analysis will be used at times as well as individual writings. There will be a midterm paper and a final exam as well as a series of response papers. Classes will engage students in a mix of applied and analytical work. Students are expected to read all assignments on time and attend all classes. Those who shed a tear over the exquisite beauty of the work will earn extra credit.

Goals:

Content: This course will primarily focus on the literary texts of Shakespeare's plays selected from among the histories, tragedies and comedies. The particular choices are based on several factors: in some cases, they represent the most popular of the canon; collectively span his creative years; represent a variety of approaches to great stories; capture extremes of human behavior; and encapsulate the beauty of metered language, metaphor, conceits, and a plethora of literary devices. Perhaps most importantly, the plays range from imaginative flights of fancy to dark journeys into the souls of men and women.

Shakespeare is perhaps singular in the prominence of his works in production throughout the world. Ironically, when the Iron Curtain was a major barrier to any dramatic works that questioned a regime, performances of Shakespeare were allowed even though his works raise questions about a totalitarian form of government, the corruption of power and the oppression of freedoms. As we face the possibility of war, the reading of Henry V will prove most engaging. Given the age of most of you, Romeo and Juliet will have a unique application to a period in your life when romance and "true" love seem both desirable and possible. The point is that all these plays engage our imagination and allow us to envision aspects of what it is to be human that may delight or disgust, attract or repel.

We will spend considerable time bringing these plays to life and "giving them legs." While we are reading them as works of literature, they are plays and therefore arguably incomplete until performed. At times we will read aloud to hear the effect of iambic pentameter or to enjoy the mellifluous beauty of a phrase. At other times, we will watch films to enjoy the effect of the plays in the hands of masterful actors. Whatever the approach, we will discover Shakespeare and the extraordinary genius of one man's mind.

Written assignments will include the following:

All writings will, of course, be word-processed and use correct grammar, spelling, etc., with references and resources properly credited. Assignments should be turned in as attachments via e-mail to jswift@uri.edu. There is no need for hard copy. The proper method for turning in assignments is as follows:

  1. Complete the paper and make sure you have your name, the date and the topic in the heading.
  2. Save the paper as YOURLASTNAME.ASSIGNMENT TITLE.DOC (title may be abbreviated)
  3. E-mail as an attachment (not as a paste-in in the body of the e-mail)
  4. In the header of the e-mail, write YOURLASTNAME.ASSIGNMENT TITLE
  5. Copy in the Undergraduate Writing Consultant, Kathryn MacDonald at kmac9330@postoffice.uri.edu.

Please do not vary from these instructions because I cannot keep searching through files and papers to be sure you are credited with the proper work.

Listserv: There is a listserv for this class at eng472@pete.uri.edu. I will use the listserv to post important notices and extended information on assignments. You may also post to the list but realize that it goes to the entire class. This is useful for questions to which everyone might want the answer. This also allows you to communicate with groups for any assigned project work. Papers should not be e-mailed to the list. Send them directly to me at jswift@uri.edu. Please use the list considerately so you do not clutter everyone’s mailboxes with extraneous materials. In this class, however, it is not extraneous to make further comments or raise additional questions regarding a given play/s. Such use is an important value of the listserv.

Participation assessment will include the following:

Undergraduate Writing Consultant: We are fortunate indeed to have Kathryn MacDonald as an undergraduate writing consultant. Her role is to assist you in improving your writing which is at the heart of clearly expressing your analysis and insight. Her assistance will entail issues such as how to organize your thoughts, making use of outlines, the creation of drafts, learning to edit your papers, employing reference manuals on writing, the proper use of spelling and grammar check—and the pitfalls, among many other matters. Kathryn is a consultant which means she will assist you with your writing but will not do the work for you. Her job is not to evaluate the content of your papers but to help you clarify your thoughts and their expression. Consequently, if you were to write about the world being flat, it is not her job to correct you and make sure you are introduced to the globe. It is simply her job to assist you in expressing that belief however flawed. Therefore, do not blame her if you get a lower grade than you expected. The intellectual content, the insight and the analysis are all yours. She may tell you that you have done a cogent job arguing that atoms don't exist but that doesn't mean you would impress a physics professor.

You are required to meet with Kathryn once following the submission of your first response paper. At that time, she will assist you with an evaluation of your writing. She and I will have met and discussed the papers prior to her meeting with you. Kathryn will contact you through the class listserv regarding appointment times. Additional meetings will depend upon your initiative in pursuing excellence in writing. This will be part of your grade both in the sense of the quality of your papers and also as part of class participation.

A major point: Kathryn's time is precious. She is a very busy person. I expect the same is true of you. Respect her time as you would your own and do not abuse her commitment. If you make an appointment with her and fail to keep it, she has every right to refuse to make another. If you make another and fail to keep the second, you will not be allowed to make any more appointments. Kathryn is a sympathetic and extremely competent person who loves to assist her peers. She worked as a teaching assistant in another course I taught and was highly valuable to the students. Please do take advantage of her skill and commitment to you. I know you will find the experience worthwhile.

Weekly Activity:

Week

Content

Assignments DUE

Jan. 21

  • Introduction to the course and requirements
  • Overview of Shakespeare's England
  •  
    Jan 23
  • Discussion and analysis of Romeo and Juliet
  • Principles of tragedy
  • Read Romeo and Juliet
  • Jan. 28
  • Discussion and analysis of Romeo and Juliet
  •  
    Jan. 30
  • View film of Romeo and Juliet (Franco Zefferrelli)
  •  
    Feb. 4
  • View film of Romeo and Juliet ( Baz Luhrmann)
  •  
    Feb. 6
  • Discussion and analysis of Measure for Measure
  • Response paper Romeo and Juliet due
  • Read Measure for Measure
  • Meet in groups to answer assigned question and e-mail brief response/bulleted points to jswift@uri.edu. Due by Feb. 10. Discussion questions
  • Feb. 11
  • Discussion and analysis of Measure for Measure
  • Groups present answers to questions on Measure for Measure
  • Feb. 13

  • Discussion and analysis of Measure for Measure
  •  
    Feb. 18
  • NO CLASS: Monday classes meet
  •  
    Feb. 20
  • Discussion and analysis Macbeth
  • Read Macbeth
  • Feb. 25
  • Discussion and analysis Macbeth
  • Response paper Measure for Measure due

    Question

  • Feb. 27
  • View film of Macbeth (Roman Polanski)
  •  
    March 4
  • Discussion and analysis Midsummer Night's Dream
  • Response paper Macbeth due

    Question

  • Read Midsummer Night's Dream
  • March 6
  • Discussion and analysis Midsummer Night's Dream
  • Class was cancelled due to snow.
    March 9-16
  • Spring Break
  • Postcards from the Edge
    March 18
  • Discussion and analysis Midsummer Night's Dream
  •  

    March 20
  • Discussion and analysis Henry V
  • Read Henry V
  • March 25
  • Discussion and analysis Henry V
  • Midterm paper on play of choice due. Full details posted on listserv.

    March 27
  • Discussion and analysis Henry V
  •  
    April 1
  • Discussion and analysis Hamlet
  • Read Hamlet
    April 3
  • Discussion and analysis of Hamlet
  •  

    April 8
  • Discussion and analysis of Hamlet
  •  

    April 10
  • Discussion and analysis of Twelfth Night
  • Response paper Hamlet due Question

    Read Twelfth Night

    April 15
  • Discussion and analysis Twelfth Night
  •  

    April 17
  • Discussion and analysis Othello
  • Read Othello
    April 22
  • Discussion and analysis Othello
  •  
    April 24
  • View film of King Lear
  • Read King Lear
    April 29
  • Discussion and analysis King Lear
  • Response paper Othello due
    May 1
  • Discussion and analysis King Lear
  • Final Exam Questions posted.
    May 5
  • Discussion and analysis King Lear and synthesis.
  •  
    May 9
  • Final exam 3:00-6:00 p.m. This time is firm and assigned by the Registrar. Do not request exceptions; they will not be granted.
  • See Final Exam Spring 2003 to figure out your final exam commitments now.
  • Final Exam
  • More detail on final
  • General Notes: This syllabus is an outline of proposed events. It is subject to change. I will never change it to make anything due earlier for you. I may change the order of things to allow for a special opportunity or to allow additional exploration on a particular topic. I will supply additional supplementary readings along the way.

    Communication: I expect everyone to use e-mail–direct to me at jswift@uri.edu for papers or personal notes, and inquiries, and the listserv eng472@pete.uri.edu for general issues and postings–in order that we can communicate efficiently with each other. We will use this tool to increase class discussion by posting additional ideas, observations, questions, and insights. If you need to see me, stop by during office hours, call or e-mail and I’ll get you in as quickly as possible.

    Attendance: Attendance is expected. You are upper-class English majors and I assume you want the stimulation of class discussion with a professor and your peers. If you will not attend on a given day, please call or e-mail. Absences will hurt your grade because class participation is an important aspect of my evaluation of your work. If you are working on a group project and do not show to work with your group, that counts doubly against you. Groups cannot function as teams if they do not support each other with respect. Blowing off the team is disrespectful.

    Reading List:

    William Shakespeare, David Bevington (Editor). The Complete Works of Shakespeare. Addison-Wesley Pub Co.; 4th edition (January 1997); ISBN: 0321012542. 1706 pages

    Additional Recommended Reading:

    Burgess, Anthony. Shakespeare. Carroll & Graf ; (February 9, 2002); ISBN: 0786709723.256 pages

    Partridge, Eric. Shakespeare's Bawdy. Routledge Classics;4 edition (May 29, 2001); 4; ISBN: 0415254000. 304 pages

    Other readings and/or viewings as applicable and assigned including excerpts from books, films, articles, and magazines or journals.

    Evaluation: Evaluation will be based on grades of the written projects as outlined above, as well as regular class attendance and participation. Grades will be determined in accordance with the University system as described in the University Manual beginning in Section 8.53.10. For the purposes of this course, that system translates as follows:

    A–  = 90 – 93 A  = 94 – 100 (there is no A+ category)
    B–  = 80 – 82 B  = 83 – 86 B+  = 87 – 89
    C–  = 70 – 72 C  = 73 – 76 C+  = 77 – 79

    (there is no D– category)

    D  = 60 – 66 D+  = 67 – 69
      F  = 59 and below  

    The weight of individual work will accrue as listed below.

    Extra Credit Tears shed and laughs laughed. If you are really involved, this should be easy and could tip you grade that one-tenth of a percent.
    20% Discussion and participation
    30% Response papers
    25% Midterm paper
    25% Final Exam

    Honor Code: I expect each of you to contribute his/her own work; however, I also encourage you to work together to solve problems, achieve solid analysis, and even to prepare and explore the theses of your papers. I also expect that you will all be direct about crediting yourself and/or others about completed work. There is nothing wrong with assisting each other. The only caveat is to acknowledge that assistance. With regard to any group work, you will be required to sign a contract agreeing to be responsible for disclosing the amount of your work and to be forthright about how much you did or did not contribute. This saves each of you from ever having to be in the awkward position of reporting or covering for another student. I also know each of you want to be honorable in your individual or group projects. On the other hand, if a student violates rules pertaining to plagiarism or cheating, I will report that student to the appropriate university authorities. I will do this because it is no favor to cover for a person who acts dishonestly. We call this enabling. It is also unfair to the students in the class who come by their grade honestly. For information on plagiarism, please see the University Manual beginning with Section 8.27.10.

    Special Needs: If you have any special circumstances arising from a disability, please let me know how I can assist you. As stated in the University Manual: "The student with a disability shall be responsible for self-identification to the Disability Services for Students in the Office of Student Life, providing appropriate documentation of disability, requesting accommodation in a timely manner, and follow-through regarding accommodations requested." In other words, it is your responsibility to make arrangements for any special needs and my responsibility to accommodate them with the assistance of the office of Disability Services for Students.

    Philosophy of Teaching: I am committed to an engaging, active partnership of learning in which I rediscover and discover the intricate genius of Shakespeare's works along with you. I am also interested in discussing these plays as a springboard for the exploration of a wide range of topics from historical events to contemporary issues. The plays will inform our lives and the converse is equally true. We are not Elizabethans so we will bring our own world with its biases and sense of history to bear on the work. We will have an opportunity to explore the most exalted to the most depraved sense of what it means to be human. Shakespeare's works are not stuffy or For Intellectuals Only—they are exciting and often inspirational. However, as I say to every class, just as no one is responsible for our individual happiness but us, no one is responsible for our intellectual excitement. I can bring mine to the classroom but you also need to be prepared to risk exposing and exploring yours. Learning should be fun and painful–thinking 'til it hurts, and addictive. I look forward to the time we will have together peering and prodding into these exceptional plays.

    Classroom Etiquette: Although I am perfectly happy to enjoy the benefits of an informal classroom in which people feel free to speak without the raising of hands and can sit in a less formal arrangement than row-by-row, this informal setting requires a particular adherence to good manners. Quite simply, I expect you all to be respectful of me and of each other. This excludes extraneous private commentary between and among students, the use of any telecommunications devices that connect you to the outside world, and includes the continued courtesy of respectful attention without interruption when others are speaking. We all learned this behavior either at home or in Kindergarten or both. You are the Sesame Street generation - actually the second Sesame Street generation; you grew up with TV shows that taught the value of please and thank you. Consider this experience to be one in whack your intellectual maturity will be judged and a major part of that judgment is your ability to be courteous on both an interpersonal and group level. I embrace humor; I do not embrace disruption. I am utterly intolerant of any student being harshly judgmental or making fun of a fellow student. I expect you are all courteous people at heart and will have absolutely no difficulty in meeting and exceeding these expectations.

    Censorship: An examination of Shakespeare's plays may well be a literary activity but it also involves scrutiny of human behavior. It is crucial that people feel free to offer opinions that may be politically unpopular or offend other people's standards of what is decent conversation in a public setting. In essence, a classroom is actually a private world in which we must all be free to express opinions without fear of censure because that opinion is distasteful to someone else. As long as we maintain a mutual commitment to be respectful, everyone can be assured that no commentary is intended to offend. The result will be an environment in which free expression is cherished as the vital centerpiece to scholarly pursuits in education. Finally, there is no such thing as bad language; there is only bad intent.

    Field Trip: If possible, we will make a trip to see a production of a Shakespearean play with the time and date to be arranged based on your schedules. Cost: TBD.

    Materials: Please check out Writing Tips.