CLS450/HPR412 – 9/11
W 4-6:45pm, Spring 2007
Dr. Alain-Philippe Durand

COURSE DESCRIPTION AND GOALS

This seminar introduces the fiction and non fiction (books and films) which deal with the tragic events of September 11, 2001. The objective of this seminar is to try to identify the characteristics (if any) that seem to shape the corpus of texts and films dealing with 9/11 as well as to study and discuss the (often controversial) public and academic reactions to such works. The main questions that will guide us in our investigation will be to find out if there is such a thing as a literature of 9/11? And if there is, how can one describe and explain it? Who has the authority (if anyone) to write on 9/11?

CORPUS

Books (Most of the texts below are on reserve at the URI Library)

Amis, Martin. “The Last Days of Muhammad Atta.” The New Yorker 24 April 2006: 153-63. (PART 1) (PART 2)
Badiou, Alain. Ethics. An Essay on the Understanding of Evil. New York: Verso, 2002.
Baudrillard, Jean. The Spirit of Terrorism. New York: Verso, 2003.
Beigbeder, Frédéric. Windows on the World. New York: Miramax, 2005.
Butler, Judith. Precarious Life. The Power of Mourning and Violence. New York: Verso, 2004.
Cleave, Chris.  Incendiary. London: Anchor, 2006.
Derrida, Jacques. Rogues. Two Essays on Reason. Palo Alto: Stanford UP, 2005.

Durand, Alain-Philippe and Naomi Mandel, eds. Novels of the Contemporary Extreme. London/New York: Continuum, 2006.
Dwyer, Jim, and Kevin Flynn. 102 Minutes. The Untold Story of the Fight to Survive Inside the Twin Towers. New York: Times Books, 2004.
Foer, Jonathan Safran.  Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2005.
Friend, David.  Watching the World Change: The Stories Behind the Images of 9/11. New York:
Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2006.
Gravois, John. "Professors of Paranoia? Academics Give a Scholarly Stamp to 9/11 Conspiracy Theories." The Chronicle of Higher Education 23 June 2006: A10.

Jacobson, Sid and Ernie Colon.  The 9/11 Report: A Graphic Adaptation. New York: Hill and Wang, 2006.
Jenkins, Henry. “Captain  America Sheds His Mighty Tears: Comics and September 11.”  Terror, Culture, Politics. Rethinking 9/11. Eds. Daniel J. Sherman and Terry Nardin. Indiana UP, 2006. 69-102.

Lentricchia, Frank and Jody McAuliffe. Crimes of Art + Terror. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2003.

Lurie, Susan. “Falling Persons and National Embodiment: The Reconstruction of Safe Spectatorship in the Photographic Record of 9/11.” Terror, Culture, Politics. Rethinking 9/11. Eds. Daniel J. Sherman and Terry Nardin. Indiana UP, 2006. 44-68.
Meyssan, Thierry. 9/11: The Big Lie. New York: Carnot, 2003.
Murphy, Dean E. September 11: An Oral History. New York: Doubleday, 2002.
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks. The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2004.
Price, Reynolds. The Good Priest’s Son. New York: Scribner, 2005.
Scarry, Elaine. “The 9/11 Commission Report: Has It Incited a Public Debate About Our Nation’s Defense?”
Terror, Culture, Politics. Rethinking 9/11. Eds. Daniel J. Sherman and Terry Nardin. Indiana UP, 2006. 206-13.
Sherman, Daniel J. “Naming and the Violence of Place.”
Terror, Culture, Politics. Rethinking 9/11. Eds. Daniel J. Sherman and Terry Nardin. Indiana UP 2006. 121-45.
Sontag, Susan. Regarding the Pain of Others. New York: Penguin, 2004.
Spiegelman, Art. In the Shadow of No Towers. New York: Pantheon, 2004.
Virilio, Paul. Ground Zero. New York: Verso, 2002.
Tristram, Claire. After. Picador, 2005.

Žižek, Slavoj. Welcome to the Desert of the Real. New York: Verso, 2002.

Films

Bird, Antonia, dir. The Hamburg Cell. 2004. (100 minutes)
Greengrass, Paul, dir. United 93. 2006. (111 minutes)
Naudet, Jules and Gideon Naudet, dirs.  9/11. 2002 (129 minutes)
Stone, Oliver, dir. World Trade Center. 2006. (129 minutes)

 
METHODOLOGY
Class sessions will be devoted to discussing the films and the readings. There are several different ways to approach a film/text in order to find meaning in it. Knowledge about the director/author is helpful, but is BY NO MEANS the key to understanding a work. For this reason some information is provided on the authors in class (and in the assigned readings); but the emphasis in this seminar will be on exchanging interpretations of texts/films with each other. The forum for exchanging ideas will consist of a mix of lectures, online forum, full class discussion and small group work and discussions.

GRADE
Class Preparation and Participation  20%
Research Paper  40%
Online Forum  20%
Group Presentation  20%

Class Preparation and Participation (20%)
All students are expected to come to class prepared.  This means that each student needs to come to class:
- having read, viewed the assigned work and having thought about it;
- prepared to ask and to answer questions on the assigned work;
- ready to engage in active class discussion, and participate fully in group discussions and activities. Simply showing up to every class and on time is expected but is not enough for class participation. Only frequent and active oral contributions to the class discussions will count toward the participation grade. Furthermore, a maximum of one absence (excused or unexcused) is allowed in this course. After one absence, your participation grade will be significantly lowered as follows:
Two absences: maximum participation grade of C
Three absences: maximum participation grade of D
Four or more absences: 0 on participation

Please let me know in advance when you have to miss class.

Any student who shows up late to class (after roll call at 4pm) will be allowed in class but will be counted absent.
The same rule applies to students who leave the class before the end of a session (we will take a break during each class). Finally, the following is not acceptable in this class: coming to class without the textbook (make copies of the assigned pages of the day if needed); using a cell phone (making or receiving calls); reading newspapers or brochures; leaving the classroom at any time during a session; chat with classmates during class (if you have a question during class, ask the instructor); use working full or part-time as an excuse for not completing an assignment or for not preparing for class; scheduling interviews and appointments with advisors at class time (if an advisor or administrator on campus tries to force you in meeting at the time of this class, please let me know asap). The participation grade will be significantly lowered for any of the above. This is a demanding course.

Research Paper (40%)

Students will write one research paper (12-15 pages of text not including bibliography and notes), typed, double-spaced, size of letter 12, Times New Roman or similar, MLA Style). The paper is due no later than Thursday, May 3 at 5pm. Students may choose any topic and approach of interest as long as topic is original and approved in advance by the instructor (no later than April 18). Topic must deal with at least one of the novels, short stories, or comics discussed in class. Students are welcome to discuss various versions of the papers with the instructor. Nevertheless, absolutely no outside help is allowed on the paper. A handout including guidelines on how to write a research paper will be distributed in class. The grade will be based on:
-originality and relevance of topic;
-content, quality of analysis;
-style and organization;
-spelling and grammar;
-respect of MLA Style.

Late work policy:  The instructor will not accept any work after the day it is due.  Mark your calendars NOW with the paper due date.

Online Forum (20%)

Students will animate a public online electronic forum. In addition, students will have the opportunity to dialogue with the following novelists who confirmed their participation to the online electronic forum : Frédéric Beigbeder, Chris Cleave, and Claire Tristram. Each student must send at least one contribution (minimum of 200 words) per week on the forum, starting on January 29, 2007. These contributions may be questions, comments, answers/reactions to the readings and discussions. They will help us to prepare, to complement, and to enrich in class discussions. Finally, each student will publish on the forum, no later than April 25, 2007, a summary (200-300 words) of his/her research paper.
The grade will be based on:
-content, quality of postings;
-frequency and length of postings;
-spelling and grammar.
 
Forum Link

How to Read and to Post Messages to the Forum:
-
Click HERE;
-
Click on topic you want to comment on. For instance, for the first week, click on “Baudrillard/Virilio/Zizek” (please note that when you first connect to the forum, you must click on page 2 at the bottom of the screen to see “Baudrillard/Virilio/Zizek”);
-
Click on “Respond to this message”;
-
Enter your name, a title, and then type in your message (the email address is facultative, if you do not want everyone in the world to know your email address, do not enter it);
-
When you are done, click on “preview” to revise everything;
-
When you are ready, click on “respond”;
-
Please note that this is a moderated forum. Your post will not show up until I approve the message.

Group Presentation (20%)
I will share the students in groups of 3 or 4 before the end of February. A drawing will assign a specific novel (Incendiary, The Good Priest’s Son, Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, or After) to each group. Groups will be responsible for entirely animating the class discussion on their assigned novel on the assigned day (see the program below for dates). The grade will be based on:

-team work, organization, cohesion, and spirit;

-ability to generate and to sustain quality discussion;

-
oral expression.

PLAGIARISM
Basically, plagiarism is using other's work as if it was yours.  You may not realize it, but certain practices lead others to conclude that other's works are your own.  Here are some of these practices:
1.Using someone's exact words and not putting quotation marks around them, which means the reader has no way of understanding this is not the work of the author.
2.Using someone's work and not attributing the source.
3.Paraphrasing so closely (same order of sentences, same order of paragraphs, same order of sections ), with merely a word substituted here and there. This indicates that the work is really still someone else's. The intellectual work of re-thinking the meaning wasn't done.  This is true even if the source is given.
4.Cut 'N Paste: Using parts of several people's work, which some think is original - Not!The sum of sentences from other authors doesn't make the combination original.  Plagiarism will not be tolerated in this course.
According to section 8.27.17 of the Faculty Senate regulations, I will forward any case of plagiarism to the Dean’s Office.  If you have any doubt, please check with the instructor.
Source

PROGRAM

JANUARY

24      
Introduction // Screening of The Hamburg Cell

31       Theory (Baudrillard's The Spirit of Terrorism, Virilio's Ground Zero, Žižek's Welcome to the Desert of the Real)


FEBRUARY

7         Theory (end) // Screening of  9/11

14       Reportage/Documents/Testimonials
            The 9/11 Commission Report ("We Have Some Planes," pages 1-46 and "Heroism and Horror," pages 278-83); Dwyer's 102 Minutes             (read at least two chapters of your choice); Murphy's September 11: An Oral History (read at least one chapter of your choice)            
            RESERVE;
Elaine Scarry. “The 9/11 Commission Report: Has It Incited a Public Debate About Our Nation’s Defense?” RESERVE
            UNDER "SHERMAN"


21       Photography
            David Friend. Watching the World Change: The Stories Behind the Images of 9/11 (pages 3-37) RESERVE
            Susan Lurie. “Falling Persons and National Embodiment: The Reconstruction of  Safe Spectatorship in the Photographic Record of    
            9/11.”
RESERVE UNDER "SHERMAN"
            Susan Sontag. Regarding the Pain of Others. (pages 3-73) ON RESERVE  / Susan Sontag's Web Site

28       Conspiracy Theory
            John Gravois's "Professors of Paranoia"  (Photocopy)

            Thierry Meyssan.
9/11: The Big Lie RESERVE
            Screening of
United 93

MARCH

7          The Short Story
            Martin Amis. “The Last Days of Muhammad Atta.” (PART 1) (PART 2)
            Frank Lentricchia and Jody McAuliffe's Crimes of Art + Terror. ("Introduction" and "Groundzeroland," pages 1-17) RESERVE
            Judith Butler's Precarious Life. The Power of Mourning and Violence / Judith Butler's Web Site

14       The Novel
           
Claire Tristram's After (with the participation of Claire Tristram on forum) / Claire Tristram's Web Site
            Watch World Trade Center prior to next class 

Spring Break 19-25 March
// Last day to drop is March 26    

28       
The Novel
            Jonathan Safran Foer's Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close / Jonathan Safran Foer's Web Site

APRIL

4          The Novel
            Reynolds Price's The Good Priest’s Son / Reynolds Price's Web Site

11        The Novel
            Chris Cleave's Incendiary (with the participation of Chris Cleave on forum) / Chris Cleave's Web Site

18        The Novel
            Frédéric Beigbeder's Windows on the World (with the participation of Frédéric Beigbeder on forum) / Frédéric Beigbeder's Web Site
            Alain-Philippe Durand and Naomi Mandel's Novels of the Contemporary
Extreme (pages 1-5 & 109-20) RESERVE
           
Guest Speaker: Dr. Naomi Mandel. "Windows on the World: Towards an Aesthetics of Complicity."
            Research Paper Topic Due

25        Comics and Conclusions
            Sid Jacobson and Ernie Colon's The 9/11 Report: A Graphic Adaptation
            Henry Jenkins. “Captain
America Sheds His Mighty Tears: Comics and September 11.” RESERVE UNDER "SHERMAN"
            Art Spiegelman's In the Shadow of No Towers

Research Paper due no later than Thursday, May 3 at 5pm.

CLS450/HPR412 Index

Home