| |
|
|
 |
Spring
Peeper
Pseudacris c. crucifer
|
|
| |
| INTRODUCTION |
|
In Rhode Island, spring peepers are often referred to as the "harbinger
of spring" (Klemens 1993)
because they generally start calling around the vernal equinox.
They are one of the most prevalent frogs in the state, though
the smallest (~1 inch long) that resides in southern New England.
They make up for their diminutive size by emitting a high-pitched,
loud, piercing call. Therefore it is their chorus that make them
so apparent. Most people in Rhode Island have heard the loud vocalizations
of peepers on a warm spring night in April; yet, few have ever
seen a peeper because they are highly cryptic. Their body is camouflaged
to resemble tree bark, where they commonly perch. In addition,
they are secretive when approached, as they often remain perfectly
still to avoid detection.
Males, the only ones to vocalize, produce two primary calls by
expanding their throat pouch. While at breeding ponds, they emit
a single, high-pitched note (i.e., resembling the call of a bird)
that they repeat 15-25 times per minute. This call note is so
high pitched that people often mistake this vocalization for an
insect chirp and has also been likened to the ring of sleigh bells
(Klemens 1993). This vocalization is intended to entice females
to breeding ponds and select a particular male. (Davis
1999a). Males also utter a rapid trill when another male approaches
too closely, that is apparently expressed in territorial disputes
(Rosen and Lemon 1974).
|
| |
| IDENTIFICATION |
- Spring peepers are the smallest frog that lives in Rhode
Island, most adults are only about 2-2.5 cm (one inch
long) (see SIZE).
- Adults are generally light brown, with a dark brown,
variable "X" pattern on their dorsum. This dorsal
pattern accounts for their species epithet, crucifer,
which translates as "one who bears a cross".
They are the only small, light brown frog in Rhode Island,
with this marking on their on the back.
- Their skin color is dynamic and often lightens at night;
peepers can change skin color to resemble their background
(Kats and VanDragt 1986).
- The eyes, which are relatively small and brown, typically
have a dark patch around them.
- Each toe has a flattened, terminal pad. These pads are
also present (and more prominent) on gray treefrogs. The
terminal pads aid in vertical climbing abilities by adding
surface tension through mucous secretions; the secretions
increases adhesive capabilities (Duellman
and Trueb 1986).
- Hind feet are webbed.
- The digits of the front limbs are relatively long.
|

spring peeper climbing |
|
Sexual dimorphisms
- Males have a dark, olive-brown vocal sac that appears
as wrinkles on their throats (this allows the skin to
expand when calling). The sac is most prominent during
the breeding season (Oplinger 1966).
- The ventral skin (throat and belly) of females is uniformly
colored usually a yellowish-beige.
- Females tend to be larger than males (see SIZE).
|

male spring peeper (above)
female (at right) |
 |
|
| |
| SIZE |
| AGE / SEX
|
SVL (SNOUT VENT LENGTH) (cm) |
SAMPLE SIZE |
|
AVERAGE
|
RANGE
|
|
ADULT FEMALE
|
2.8
|
1.9 - 3.5
|
498
|
|
ADULT MALE
|
2.5
|
1.8 - 3.2
|
596
|
|
JUVENILE
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
METAMORPH
|
1.35
|
1.0 - 2.0 |
121
|
| AGE/ SEX
|
MASS (g)
|
SAMPLE SIZE
|
|
AVERAGE
|
RANGE
|
|
ADULT FEMALE
|
1.8
|
0.4 - 3.0
|
498
|
|
ADULT MALE
|
1.2
|
0.3 - 2.2
|
596
|
|
JUVENILE
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
|
METAMORPH
|
0.2
|
0.1 - 0.4
|
121
|
|
|
| |
| RELATIVE ABUNDANCE |
Rhode Island
Based on their
loud choruses heard during April, peepers are one of the most abundant
frogs in Rhode Island. Choruses can be detected from one-half mile
away, and it could be assumed that these sites hold as many as a
few thousand frogs. However, based on our research in Rhode Island
at selected breeding ponds, we found that most ponds have hundreds,
rather than thousands of peepers. For example, Paton
et al. (2000) detected 192 males and 148 females immigrating
to a 0.16 hectare breeding pond on Trustom Pond National Wildlife
Refuge. At other similar sized ponds in Rhode Island, we have experienced
similar capture rates (P. Paton, unpubl. data).
|
Regional
Abundant
throughout the region, probably one of the most abundant frogs in
southern New England (Klemens 1993; DeGraaf
and Yamasaki 2001). |
| |
| DISTRIBUTION |
Rhode Island
Found throughout the
state. We detected spring peepers in 50% of 119 ponds we sampled
in Rhode Island west of Narragansett Bay during the 2000 field season
(Paton and Egan 2001). Peepers
on also common on Block Island (C. Heinz pers. obs.). They are found
across the urbanization gradient, in Providence and Warwick, to
the rural western part of the state. |
Regional
Found throughout
all states in New England. Burne (2000)
detected spring peepers at 64% of 78 ponds around the Concord, Massachusetts
area. Klemens (1993) collected peepers from sea level barrier beach
ponds to mountaintop lakes as high as 610m (2000 feet) in the Berkshire
mountains of western Massachusetts. |
General
There are two subspecies
of spring peepers. Northern Spring peepers (P. c. crucifer)
are found throughout most of eastern United States, and much of
Canada as far west as Manitoba (Klemens 1993). The northern terminus
of their range extends from the Gaspe Peninsula westward through
James Bay to Lake Winnipeg at about 50° N. latitude (Conant
and Collins 1991). The southern spring peeper (P. c. bartramiana)
is found only in northern Florida and southeastern Georgia.
|
| |
| HABITAT NON BREEDING |
|
Peepers are habitat generalists, ranging from mature forests
to old field habitats, although they are most commonly found
in or near moist deciduous woodlands. They also can be found
in coniferous forests, grassy meadows, shrubby fields, gardens,
sandy coastal dune habitats, as well as pine barrens (Klemens
1993). In Rhode Island, we have even seen them at the southern
tip of Sachuest Point National Wildlife Refuge, where the
nearest forested patch was several kilometers away (P. Paton,
pers. obs.).
Spring peepers in Rhode Island are found at breeding ponds
from mid-March through May in Rhode Island (Paton et al.
2000, Paton and Crouch In press). The rest of year they
reside away from breeding ponds where little is known about
their ecology. They have been detected as far as 300 m (1,000
ft) from breeding ponds, however much more needs to be learned
about dispersal distances of this secretive species (Davis
1999). Once peepers arrive on their non-breeding areas,
they apparently establish territories (1-5 m [4-18 ft] diameter),
generally around woody vegetation (bark debris, logs, stumps)
(Delzell 1958)
|
Spring peeper -camouflaged
|
During cold winter months, they hibernate, presumably under moss
or leaf litter or in shallow burrows in the soil (Davis 1999b,
DeGraaf and Rudis 1983). They
are able to withstand freezing of body fluids for up to two weeks
(Storey and Storey 1986).
|
| |
| HABITAT BREEDING |
| Spring peepers use
a broad array of aquatic habitat for breeding site; however, they
appear to prefer water bodies with relatively long hydroperiods
(Paton and Egan 2001). Wright (1914)
characterized their breeding habitat as any pool, ditch, or pond
that had enough surface water to support successful breeding. Klemens
(1993) reported peepers using woodland vernal pools, sphagnum bogs,
red maple swamps, shrub swamps, swamps and marshes fringing lakes
and reservoirs, wet meadows, fens, pasture ponds, bogs, quarry and
sand pit ponds, brackish water lagoons behind barrier beaches, water
filled ruts on dirt roads, and in flooded pastures. Peepers also
breed in beaver ponds (Lykens and
Forester 1987) and along the river floodplain, where they congregate
in shallow, densely vegetated areas (C. Raithel, pers. comm.). Several
authors suggest they prefer aquatic sites near brushy second-growth
habitat (Conant 1975; Conant and Collins
1998). Conant and Collins (1998) also felt they preferred breeding
ponds where trees or shrubs stand in the water. This is probably
because males tend to form choral groups and vocalize from vegetation
above the pond surface. Breeding ponds often have an open canopy,
and extensive grass or emergent vegetation at pond edges (Murphy
1963). |
| |
| HYDROLOGY |
During our pond research in
Rhode Island in 2000, spring peepers were detected in ponds with
a variety of hydroperiods, although they tended to prefer ponds
with longer hydroperiods( Paton and Egan 2001).
|
| |
| MOVEMENT CHRONOLOGY |
|
In Rhode Island, there are two times during the year when peepers
are evident. March-May during the breeding season, when they are
migrating to breeding ponds and during the fall (September-October)
when you often hear single individuals calling from trees or bushes.
As with all other pond-breeding amphibians, peak movements take
place rainy nights. In Rhode Island, adults are typically most
active from 25 March to 27 May (Paton and Crouch In press). During
this period, we captured 95% of adults immigrating towards breeding
ponds in Rhode Island (Paton and Crouch In press). Lykens and
Forester (1986) documented a similar pattern, with females arriving
at breeding ponds over a 5-8 week period. Most breeding activity
takes place during April, although based on captures of gravid
females in May (Paton, unpubl. data) it is probable that some
late females breed in ponds during May. Delzell (1958) suggested
that female peepers mated quickly and left the pond within 1-2
days. After the end of May, it is very unusual to capture adults
near breeding ponds, or even 125 m from breeding in forested areas
(P. Paton, unpubl. data). We did not capture any adult peepers
near breeding ponds in the fall, in contrast to other species
such as wood frogs (Rana sylvatica)(Paton and Crouch, In
press).
Metamorphs first start to emerge from breeding ponds at the end
of June (~27 June). Peak emigration for metamorphs occurs around
22 July, with some individuals leaving ponds as late as 10 August
(Paton and Crouch In press)
|
| |
| REPRODUCTION |
|
At breeding sites, males establish calling territories (Forester
and Lykens 1986; Fellers 1979b)
spaced about 0.5 m apart (Gerhardt
et al. 1989)and occupy them for about a month (Delzell 1958).
They tend to call from the ground on cold nights and from shrub
or tree perches on warmer nights. Calling typically begins around
dusk, with chorus volumes increasing throughout the evening; choruses
can also be heard on warm afternoons. Wells
and Bevier (1997) recorded peepers in Connecticut calling
in air temperatures between 5-22°C and in water temperature
from 10-20°C. Interestingly, there is sexual dimorphism in
the hearing abilities of peepers. Studies show that females are
more attuned to the frequency emitted by calling males, whereas
males have difficulty hearing their own calls (Wilczynski
et al. 1984). Perhaps males are just deaf from sitting in
the midst of a huge chorus.
Once a pair is in amplexus, the pair will dive to the pond bottom to
deposit eggs. In contrast to many anurans
that oviposit eggs in communal aggregations, peepers deposit eggs
singly under leaf litter or debris at the bottom of the pond (Klemens
1993). Therefore, detecting peeper eggs is extremely difficult.
|
| |
| EGG MASS |
| Peeper eggs are deposited
singly on the pond bottom under vegetation and debris (e.g., leaf litter).
Egg are small (~1.1 mm(0.04") in diameter)(Duellman and Trueb 1986)
and therefore are difficult to detect. Eggs, which range in color from
white to black (Wright and Wright 1949), hatch in <1 week if water
is warm. Females may deposit as many as 900 eggs (Duellman and Trueb 1986). |
| |
| LARVAE |
|
Spring peepers remain tadpoles for about 90-100 days (Wright
1914). They reach a length of about 3 cm (1.2") before
transforming (Dickerson
1906; Wright and Wright 1949). Their tail is 1.4-2.1
times their body length. Their ventral surface is reddish
bronze and shiny with metallic luster. (Dickerson 1906).
The eyes of the tadpoles are lateral; the only other tadpole
in the state with lateral eyes is the gray treefrog (Hyla
versicolor).
Spring peeper larvae tend to congregate in the warm shallows
of ponds, in areas with dense vegetation where they are
usually "inactive and benetic" - a stategy used
as an anti-predator defense (Lawler
1989).
|

spring peeper tadpole
|
|
| |
| METAMORPHS |
|
When metamorphs emerge from breeding sites,
they resemble the adults but are smaller (see SIZE) and
typically lighter in color.
|
 |
|
| |
| JUVENILES |
|
In contrast to most other anurans, we have never captured individuals
that were intermediate in size between metamorphs and adults; that is,
juveniles; therefore, they must grow rapidly during their first fall
out of the breeding ponds
Sexual maturity: Delzell (1958) and Collins
(1975) reported that both sexes of peepers breed in their
first year of life.
|
| |
| FOOD |
Adults
Adult peepers feed on a variety of small invertebrates, and thus, are
beneficial to the environment by acting as natural pest control
agents. Spiders account for the bulk of their diet (48%), although
they also gorge themselves on mites, sowbugs, leafhoppers, ants,
harvestmen, nematode worms, and lepidoptera (moth and butterfly)
larvae (Gilhen 1984). In the
spring, adults are known to eat their castoff skin (Duellman and
Trueb 1986).
Recently emerged metamorphs apparently feed on spiders, ants, beetles,
mites, ticks, caterpillars, and gastropods (Oplinger
1967); a diet similar to the adults.
|
Larvae
Larva feed on small aquatic
organisms such as diatoms and algae attached to underwater vegetation
(Oplinger 1967).
|
| |
| PREDATION |
Adults
Because they are so
small, adults are vulnerable to carnivorous insects, with giant
water bugs and Dytiscid diving beetles documented preying on adults
(Hinshaw and Sullivan 1990).
|
Larvae
The small tadpoles
fall prey to aquatic predators such as fish, other frogs, newts,
salamanders, and large carnivorous insects (Davis 1999a). As a defense
mechanism, they move in large numbers at night is to avoid diurnal
predators such as birds and snakes. In general, spring peeper larvae
are relatively slow-growing, inactive, and poor competitors, so
survival is often low (Morin 1995). |
| |
| CONSERVATION CONCERNS |
|
This species presently is secure in Rhode Island. It is widely
distributed across the state, including urban areas. Peepers tend
to be habitat generalist, as they are found in a variety of wetlands.
Gibbs (1998b) investigated the effects of habitat fragmentation
on five species of amphibians and found that peepers were among
the least sensitive to habitat perturbations. However, they will
not breed under all conditions. Glooschenko
et al. (1992) found they were sensitive to acid rain, and
larva are not found in ponds with a low pH (<4.0)(Freda
and Taylor 1992). In contrast, Pierce
(1985) found no evidence that peeper larvae were particularly
sensitive to low pH. Pesticides may impact local populations,
as one population had detectable levels of DDT 26 years after
the last time it has been used in the area to control mosquito
populations (Russell et al.
1995).
Although they typically prefer ponds with long hydroperiods,
they tend to avoid ponds with fish (Hecnar
1997), therefore fish introductions to ponds could be detrimental
to local populations. However, other researchers have found that
peepers can avoid vertebrate predators hiding by quietly on the
bottom of the pond (Lawler 1989; Smith
and Van Buskirk 1995; Skelly
1995).
|
 |
NEXT SPECIES |
 |
|
|