| |
|
|
 |
WOOD
FROG
Rana
sylvatica
|
|
| |
| INTRODUCTION |
|
In Rhode Island, wood frogs are the harbingers of spring as they are
typically the first species to arrive at the breeding ponds and begin
their loud quacking mating call. Their movement phenology varies annually,
depending on climatic conditions; but, in Rhode Island they emigrate
to breeding sites in most years during late February to early March,
as daily maximum air temperatures starts to reach the low 50s. The en
masse migration generally occurs at night during the first heavy downpour,
so the first warm rainstorm during late winter or early spring often
results in hopping armies of wood frogs headed to the nearest pond.
Compared to other amphibians species of that utilize ephemeral ponds
for breeding in southern New England, the wood frog is one of
the only species that truly can be considered obligate to vernal
pools. Wood frogs successfully breed in ponds with shorter hydroperiods
than any other amphibian in this region, with tadpole metamorphosis
often complete by mid-July. Therefore, ponds that dry by August
still provide perfectly suitable breeding habitat, whereas it
takes much longer for the young of most other species to complete
metamorphosis. In fact, the state of Massachusetts
uses the presence of wood frogs as one of their criteria for certifying
a pond as a "vernal pool".
|
| |
| IDENTIFICATION |
- The only 'masked' frog in Rhode Island.
- The most distinctive feature of the wood frog is the
dark mask-like pattern extending from the tip of the nose,
through the eye and tympanum and tapering off above the
base of the forelimb. It is this characteristic that has
earned them the nickname 'robber frog'
- A white line runs below the mask, defining the upper
lip.
- The dorsum of the
adult wood frogs varies from light pinkish- tan to dark
brown. Females are generally much lighter in color and
display a reddish hue during the breeding season.
- The venter is white,
cream, or slightly yellowish in color and immaculate,
whereas the similar colored throat and breast may have
dark mottling.
- The underside of the hind legs varies from translucent
white to pale yellow (Klemens
1993). Colors usually more brilliant in males.
- Hind legs are marked with dark bars.
- Front toes are unwebbed.
- The dorsal-lateral
ridges are pronounced and extend the length of the
body (behind the eye to near the vent).
|
Color variation: male (on top) and female
wood frog during breeding season.
|
- Some individuals have dark spotting or dark patches on their
sides below the dorso-lateral ridge.
- Considerable geographic variation occurs in this species,
with western and northern populations characterized by a light
mid-dorsal stripe extending onto the hind legs (Martof
and Humphies 1959; Klemens 1993).
- On average, females are larger (see measurements below) and
lighter in color than males.
- Breeding males have swollen thumbs with large nuptial pads
and thick forearms.
- The sexes can be distinguished by the shape of the webs between
the hind toes, which are convex in males and concave in females
(Knox 1999). In addition, the
4th digit on the hind feet of females tends to be much larger
than found on males.
- Voice: croak or quack. Some people, with poor hearing,
mistake wood frogs for ducks quacking. Male wood frogs may be
heard anytime- day or night- during the breeding season (Wright
and Wright 1949). In Rhode Island, it has been our experience
that wood frogs calling activity peaks during the middle of
the afternoon, when air and water temperatures are over 50°F
(see Crouch 1999). Once one wood
frog initiates calling, other individuals will readily join
in the chorus. In fact, we have found that playing a tape recording
of wood frog vocalizations will often start an active chorus.
|
| |
| SIZE |
| AGE / SEX
|
SVL (SNOUT
VENT LENGTH) (cm) |
SAMPLE SIZE
|
|
AVERAGE
|
RANGE |
Std. deviation
|
|
ADULT FEMALE
|
5.4
|
4.0- 6.5 |
0.5
|
696
|
|
ADULT MALE
|
4.6
|
3.5- 5.9 |
0.3
|
1578
|
|
JUVENILE
|
3.2
|
2.4- 3.9 |
0.4
|
61
|
|
METAMORPH
|
2.0
|
1.1- 3.1 |
0.3
|
1061
|
| AGE/ SEX
|
MASS (g)
|
SAMPLE SIZE
|
|
AVERAGE
|
RANGE |
Std. deviation
|
|
ADULT FEMALE
|
16.6
|
5.1- 33.4 |
4.5
|
696
|
|
ADULT MALE
|
9.5
|
5.0- 19.4 |
1.6
|
1578
|
|
JUVENILE
|
3.1
|
1.3- 5.4 |
0.9
|
61
|
|
METAMORPH
|
0.8
|
0.2- 3.4 |
0.3
|
1061
|
|
(University of Rhode Island unpubl. data)
|
| |
| RELATIVE ABUNDANCE |
Rhode Island
We detected wood
frogs in 72% of 119 randomly-selected ponds in the western part
of the state ( see Paton and Egan 2001)
during the 2000 field season.
|
Regional
Although disappearing from many urban areas, Rana sylvatica is presently
secure in southern New England, occurring in most state parks, forests,
and private sanctuaries, as well as in many suburban and rural areas
(Klemens 1993).
Burne (2000) found wood frogs
in 77% of 78 randomly-selected ponds he surveyed near Concord,
Massachusetts, which was remarkably similar to our results in
Rhode Island (72%, see above; Paton and Egan 2001).
|
| |
| DISTRIBUTION |
Rhode Island
Wood frogs are common on mainland
Rhode Island where habitat is suitable (Klemens 1993).
|
Regional
Wood frogs are common
in suitable habitat throughout southern New England.
|
General
Wood frogs range farther
north than any other amphibian in North America, reaching 69° latitude
within the Arctic Circle (Martof and Humphries 1959; Klemens 1993). Their
northern range limit corresponds with the edge of the northern limit of
spruce forests. Wood frogs are found throughout the northeastern United
States, the Great Lakes, and throughout Canada into Alaska; their range
covers approximately four million square miles (Martof and Humphries 1959).
They also range south along the Appalachian Plateau to extreme northern
Georgia, and eastern Tennessee and Kentucky, with disjunct populations
occur in Alabama, Arkansas, and Missouri (Klemens 1993).
|
| |
| HABITAT NON BREEDING |
|
Except for the very brief period spent at breeding ponds, wood
frogs are terrestrial. They utilize all types of forests and woodlands,
including maritime, deciduous, and coniferous (Klemens 1993);
as well as a variety of other types of habitats. Wood frogs were
found in shaded boggy areas (Bellis
1962, 1965; Stockwell and
Hunter 1989; Roberts and Lewin
1979) in Minnesota. In Michigan, Heatwole
(1961) observed wood frogs in hardwood swamps dominated by
American elm (Ulmus americanus), red maple (Acer rubrum),
and yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis). In Connecticut,
Klemens (1993) found wood frogs in pastures, along abandoned logging
roads, and in lawns with forested edge habitat. Wood frogs are
uncommon in urban area and other degraded areas (Klemens 1993).
During the coldest months wood frogs hibernate under leaf litter
(Pinder et. al. 1992; Windmiller
1996) rotting logs, stumps, rocks, and moss (Wright and Wright
1949; Klemens 1993). Bellis (1965, citing: Blanchard 1933; Heatwole
1961) suspected wood frogs hibernated in mucky, peat substrate
in Minnesota.
Wood frogs have perfected the cryogenic freezing process. In the winter,
as much as 35-45% of the frogs body may freeze, and turn to ice. Ice
crystals form beneath the skin and become interspersed among body's
skeletal muscles. During the freeze the frogs breathing, bloodflow,
and heartbeat cease. Freezing is made possible by specialized proteins
and glucose, which prevent intracellular freezing and dehydration.
|
| |
| HABITAT BREEDING |
Wood frogs prefer
forested vernal pools (semi-permanent and temporary flooded ponds)
for breeding. However, observers have noted wood frogs breeding
in grassy pasture ponds, ditches, fens, wooded swamps, flooded meadows
(Klemens 1993) and, in Maine, abandoned beaver flowages, old gravel
pits, cattail swamps, and slow moving streams (Knox 1999). The common
characteristic amongst these waterbodies is that they are typically
fishless. Wood frogs bred in both closed and open-canopy wetlands
(Werner and Glennemeier 1999).
|
| |
| HYDROLOGY |
|
Amphibian species richness and productivity in breeding ponds
is positively correlated with hydroperiod length in experimental
situations (Wilbur 1987; Rowe and
Dunson 1995) and in natural population (Pechmann
et al. 1989; Semlitsch et al. 1996; Snodgrass
et al. 2000a). The importance of hydroperiod length in natural
populations was shown by Semlitsch et al. (1996), who monitored
a pond in South Carolina for over 16 years that contained standing
water an average of 170 days annually (3-391 days). They found
that years with short hydroperiods (<100 days) resulted in
total reproduction failure, while years with long hydroperiods
(>200 days) tended to have the greatest diversity and productivity
(Paton and Crouch In press).
Compared to all other pond-breeding amphibians in Rhode Island,
with the possible exception of marbled salamander (Ambystoma
opacum), wood frog has one of the shortest hydroperiod requirements
(Paton and Crouch In press). In Rhode Island, wood frogs typically
enter breeding ponds in early March and most metamorphs have immigrated
by mid-July. Therefore, ponds have to have water for about 145
days for successful reproduction by most populations of wood frogs
in the state. Monthly precipitation in Rhode Island is actually
relatively constant (3-4" during each month (National Weather
Service)). Pond drying, therefore, is not caused by monthly variation
in precipitation levels, but rather changes in evapotranspiration
rates. Also, during the summer months, as trees need more water,
local ground water tables drop rapidly, resulting in many ponds
drying (Golet et al. 1993).
|
| |
| MOVEMENT CHRONOLOGY |
Wood frogs are
Rhode Island's earliest emerging ranid. They typically emerge in
early to mid-March, but movement phenology can be much earlier or
later depending on local climatic conditions (Paton and Crouch In
press). Both lack of precipitation and snow on the ground can alter
movement patterns.
|
| |
| REPRODUCTION |
Wood frogs emerge from hibernation
and begin their annual migration to breeding ponds when melting
snow and spring rains saturate the ground. As females enter
the water, males actively compete for females by attempting
to mount them. If successful, males will remain clasped onto
female's back (termed amplexus)
until she deposit her eggs. In the lab, we have seen pairs
in amplexus for over 24 hours.
As the female deposits her eggs, the male fertilizes the eggs
by depositing sperm onto the egg mass and into the water.
The egg mass is usually attached to woody vegetation near
the surface of the water in a relatively shallow section of
the pond.
A 3-year study by Crouch and
Paton (2000) documented considerable variation in egg-deposition
chronology among breeding ponds within the relatively small
area that they monitored in southern Rhode Island. This variation
probably was due to micro-climate variation among ponds. Ponds
with an open canopy (that is no trees covering the pond and
presumably with much warmer water temperatures) tended to
have much earlier deposition dates than closed-canopy ponds
(Crouch and Paton 2000). |
Wood frogs in amplexus
|
Although wood frogs can be explosive breeders, their breeding
season may be protracted in adverse weather. In 80% of their breeding
ponds where egg chronology was known, most depositions occurred
during a 5-8 day period. This supports previous research from
other regions of North America that wood frog egg-mass deposition
is usually rapid, often requiring less than 1 week (Howard
1980; Seale 1982; Berven
1990). However, Crouch and Paton (2000) documented some ponds
that took over 3 weeks to complete deposition. Cold weather can
interrupt and extend breeding season. Meeks
and Nagel (1973) reported that air and water temperatures
of 2.2° C and 5° C, respectively, inhibit egg deposition,
whereas air and water temperatures of 11.0° C and 8.8°
C increased egg-deposition rates.
|
| |
| EGG MASS |
| The majority of
wood frog egg masses are deposited in a large communal aggregation.
However there is a tendency for egg masses in ponds with smaller
populations (<100 breeding females) to deposit their eggs
away from the primary aggregation (Crouch and Paton 2000).
Wood frogs are one of only two species that regularly deposits
communal egg masses in Rhode Island; the other being northern
leopard frog (Rana pipiens). Many theories have been
developed to try to explain why wood frogs do deposit eggs
in aggregations, whereas most other anurans either deposit
solitary egg masses (e.g., American toad) or lay eggs individually
(e.g., spring peeper). Waldman
(1982) reported that communal egg laying was profitable
for the eggs in the center of the cluster. He found that eggs
in the interior were insulated from temperature extremes,
and were thus warmer than those deposited at the outside of
the cluster. The temperature in the center |
Communal egg mass (ca. 1200 masses)
|
can be as much as 1.6° C warmer than the surrounding water (Herreid
and Kinney 1967; Hassinger
1970; Waldman 1982); therefore, decreasing development time
of larva. Herreid and Kinney (1967) further suggested that egg clustering
enhanced overall fertilization and showed experimentally that fertilization
rate increased at higher temperatures. Seymour (1995) found that
solar heating also promoted interstitial convection currents, which
carried oxygenated water to the embryos in the center of the egg
mass. Communal egg aggregations may also reduce predation (Herreid
and Kinney 1967; Hassinger 1970; Waldman 1982) or reduce other environmental
stresses. For example, Karns (1983)
found hatching success was higher in larger rafts than smaller,
in acidic bog water.
Wood frog eggs are deposited near the edge of the pond on the
water's surface where water temperature is highest (Wright and
Wright 1949). They are usually attached to submerged branches
and herbaceous vegetation. Overhanging branches of red maple trees,
(Acer rubrum), flooded shrubs (e.g., buttonbush [Cephalanthus
occidentalis]), and herbaceous plants such as Beggar's Tick
(Bidens spp.) were common plants utilized during 2000 in
Rhode Island.
A wood frog egg mass
consists of clear jelly capsules surrounding individual bi-colored
embryos; the embryos are black above and white below. When
initially deposited, an egg mass is approximately 7 cm in
diameter (about the size of golf ball) (Duellman
and Trueb 1986), but begins to expand as it absorbs water
and eventually reaches the size of soft ball. Documented clutch
sizes vary: Wright and Wright (1949) reported an average of
2000-3000 eggs per clutch, which is considerably higher than
reported by Possardt (1974)
or Duellman and Trueb (1986). Possardt reported 1020 as average
in Massachusetts; and Duellman and Trueb (1986) found an egg
mass contained about 1750 eggs. Eggs hatch in 10 to 30 days
(Degraaf and Rudis 1983;
Oliver 1955), depending on the temperature of the water; although
in Rhode Island it probably takes at least 20 days in most
years (P. Paton pers. obs).
Wood frog egg masses can easily be distinguished from those
of the spotted salamander (Ambystoma maculatum) by
the lack of an outer gelatinous sheath. Pickerel frog (Rana
palustris) egg masses are similar in shape and design
but contain brown embryos; and furthermore, are deposited
much later in the season than wood frogs. |
Wood frog egg mass
|
|
| |
| LARVAE |
|
Newly hatched wood frog tadpoles are dark brown to black. As
they grow, their dorsum lightens to a mottled olive brown (Altig
1970) and their venter color changes to a distinguishing pinkish-bronzy
iridescence (Knox 1999). The tail fins of wood frog tadpoles are
translucent and sometimes mottled with gold and blackish flecks.
The tail fin is rounded dorsally, tapering to a fine point (Altig
1970); the tail musculature is bicolored.
Wood frog tadpoles grow at varying rates depending on water temperature,
tadpole density, and available food resources (Wilbur
1977; Riha and Berven 1991).
Minton (1972) reported that tadpoles
develop in 6 to 15 weeks. In Rhode Island, we have found that egg
typically hatch in mid-April and metamorphosis is complete by mid-June
to mid-July (Paton and Crouch In press). Therefore, in Rhode Island
it generally takes at least 8 weeks for metamorphs to emerge from
ponds after hatching. Previous research has shown that the timing
of pond drying can also affect the length of the larval period,
with protracted development in ponds that have longer hydroperiods
(Wilbur 1987; Semlitsch
1987; Semlitsch and Wilbur
1988; Skelly 1996).
Identification of wood frog tadpoles is usually relatively easy because
wood frogs are the earliest anuran to breed in ponds in Rhode Island;
therefore, they often are the only tadpoles encountered in ponds during
April and early May - particularly in ponds with short hydroperiods.
In ponds with longer hydroperiods, green frog or bullfrog tadpoles could
also be detected in March or April, but their tadpoles tend to be much
larger, greener in color, and exhibit dark spots on the dorsum and tail.
Recently hatched tadpoles initially feed on their remaining yolk and
on the remains of the egg capsules (Raithel, unpubl. data). As
they develop, young tadpoles feed on algae and various microorganisms
scraped from aquatic vegetation with their specialized rasping
mouth parts. As they grow older and larger, decaying plants and
some animal matter are also consumed (Knox 1999). Petranka
et al. (1994) demonstrated that wood frog tadpoles will readily
prey upon the eggs and smaller tadpoles of American toads (Bufo
americanus) and the eggs and unhatched larva of spotted salamander
(Ambystoma maculatum) (Petranka et al 1998).
|
| |
| METAMORPHS |
|
Stebbins (1951) found that metamorphosis
occurs on average 67 days after hatching. The majority of the
metamorphs exit the breeding ponds by mid-July in Rhode Island
(Paton and Crouch In press), usually during rainy nights, congregating
under leaves and other debris while making their way to the upland
(Knox 1999). Synchronized breeding and rapid emergence by metamorphs
may be an adaptation to minimize tadpole predation and cannibalism
(Petranka and Thomas 1995).
Unfortunately, most of them (70% or more) succumb to predation
and other natural hazards before reaching adulthood (Stebbins
1951).
Within a few weeks, recently emerged metamorphs acquire adult characteristics
in terms of coloration and markings.
|
| |
| JUVENILES |
|
The term juvenile refers to individuals too young to breed. Juvenile
wood frogs are similar in appearance to that of the adult, differing
only in overall size and distinctiveness of identifying characteristics.
Heatwole (1961) thought that individuals encountered mid-summer
less than 3.4 cm SVL were
juveniles from the previous breeding season. Age to Maturity:
Collins (1975) and McLaren
(1965) found that male wood frogs mature in 1-2 years, whereas
females mature in 2 years. Another study by Berven
(1981) found that male and female wood frogs in northern Maryland
mature in 3-4 years.
It has been our experience in Rhode Island that juveniles are most
evident from mid-April through mid-June and in early September
(Paton and Crouch In press). Interestingly in the spring, juveniles
tend to arrive at breeding ponds just after the last of the adult
males have immigrated from ponds. However, just before metamorphs
emerged from ponds, juvenile capture rates decline. There is another
small pulse of juveniles that are captured near breeding ponds
in the early fall (see movement phenology above). Presumably,
the pre-breeding aged frogs are prospecting across the landscape,
searching for breeding sites once they mature enough to initiate
breeding. Previous researchers have documented young wood frogs
dispersing over 2 km from their natal pond to a new breeding pond
(Berven and Grudzien. 1990). Therefore,
this exploratory phase by juvenile wood frogs is probably critical.
|
| |
| FOOD |
Adults
Adult wood frogs feed on a variety
of invertebrate including flies, beetles, spiders, earthworms, moth larva,
slugs, snails, and annelids (Klemens 1993; Knox 1999).
|
Larvae
Newly hatched larva
feed on their egg masses and associated algae, as wood frog tadpoles
are "microphagous filter-feeders" (Petranka
et al. 1998) with a largely herbivorous diet (Nyman
1985).
Larger tadpoles use their specialized mouth parts to feed on
algae and various microorganisms scraped from aquatic vegetation,
decaying plants and some animal matter (Knox 1999). Petranka
(1994) found that larger tadpoles will feed on the tadpoles
of American Toads.
|
| |
| PREDATION |
Adults
A variety of animals
feed on wood frogs. In breeding ponds, adults fall prey northern
water snakes (Nerodia s. sipedon), snapping turtles (Chelydra
s. serpentina), herons, mink, and raccoons (Knox 1999). On land,
predators include: black racer snakes (Coluber constrictor), ribbon
snakes (Thamnophis sauritus) garter snakes (Thamnophis
sirtalis) (Klemens 1993), skunks, foxes, coyotes, and some larger
birds (Knox 1999).
|
Larvae
Tadpoles often
succumb to cannibalism, especially to their larger 'relatives'.
Other predation accounts cited by Knox (1999) are: tadpoles are
eaten by predacious diving beetles (Dytiscidae spp.) ( Young
1967), Ambystoma salamanders (Caldwell
et al. 1980), Blandings (Emydoidea blandingii), and wood
turtles (Clemmys insculpta) (McCollough unpubl. data). Knox
(1999) also noted that tadpoles high and dry in ponds that dried
untimely are consumed by wading, shore, and land birds.
|
| |
| CONSERVATION CONCERNS |
Although relatively
common in Rhode Island and New England, there is evidence that their populations
are negatively impacted by suburban sprawl (Paton and Egan 2001). We found
that wood frogs population sizes tended to be much larger in breeding
ponds in relatively unfragmented forested stands in the western part of
the state compared to urban areas, such as Providence. At breeding ponds
near busy roads, we have seen large numbers of wood frogs killed while
trying to cross the road. As suburbanization increases in Rhode Island,
more and more breeding ponds could become isolated from other breeding
ponds. This could eventually to lead to extirpations of many populations
at some breeding ponds, unless steps are taken to ensure protection of
all vital habitats including breeding ponds, the adjacent upland forested
habitat, and forested dispersal corridors between breeding ponds.
|

NEXT SPECIES
|
|