CHAPTER 9 STUDENT ACTIVITIES
9.10.10 Recognition of Student Organizations. The University
of
Rhode Island recognizes the Student Senate, Inc. as the representative
of
URI undergraduate students, and the Graduate Student Association as the
representative
of graduate students. #00-01-30
9.10.11 Recognition of student organizations shall be the
responsibility
of the Director of the Memorial Union in consultation with the Student
Senate
for undergraduate student organizations and the Graduate Student
Association
for graduate student organizations. #00-01-30
9.11.10 Organizations. No student organization shall use the
name
of the University in outside activities, thereby purporting to
represent
the University, unless such use is approved and authorized by the
Director
of the Memorial Union and Student Activities.
9.11.11 Before advertising, notice of all student meetings
or
social events shall be filed with the Director of the Memorial Union
and
Student Activities or the Office of Residential Life as outlined in the
student
handbook. The Director of the Memorial Union and Student Activities
shall
control scheduling to prevent conflicts. Notice of meetings of interest
to
the University community shall be filed with the Director of the
Memorial
Union and Student Activities at least one week before the meeting so
that
they may be publicized as widely as possible.
9.11.12 Within their areas of responsibility, the Directors
of
the Memorial Union, Dining Services, Athletics, Residential Life, and
Student
Life must approve in writing any fund raising, sales, solicitation, or
petitioning
by individuals or groups. For other areas, the Director of Student Life
must
provide approval. Procedures are listed in the student handbook.
9.11.13 The Director of the Memorial Union and Student
Activities,
in cooperation with the faculty adviser and the Accounting Office,
shall
cooperate with student organizations in auditing accounts and keeping
expenses
within estimated income.
9.12.10 Intercollegiate Competition . Only students who are
duly
matriculated and regularly enrolled as candidates for a bachelor's
degree
and who are doing full work (carrying at least a minimum credit-hour
load)
shall represent the University in intercollegiate competition. #00-01-30
9.12.11 No student who has completed the requirements for a
bachelor's
degree shall be eligible to represent the University in intercollegiate
competition
except for participation in contests occurring shortly after
commencement
and provided such contests are part of a regularly organized schedule. #00-01-30
9.12.12 No member of a University team shall be allowed to
play
elsewhere with any organization while enrolled on a University team,
without
consent of the Director of Athletics. #00-01-30
9.12.13 Additional regulations for athletic eligibility
shall
be the rules adopted by the National Collegiate Athletic Association. #00-01-30
9.13.10 Political Groups. Politically-minded student groups,
both
partisan and non-partisan, may be recognized by the University and may
hold
meetings for business and discussion in rooms in University buildings,
but
these groups shall not use campus facilities free of charge for
meetings
or rallies open to the general public which are intended to promote the
campaigns
of candidates for public office.
9.13.11 The University shall not be responsible for the
views
expressed or entertained by either the speakers or the groups (see
9.13.10)
nor can it be held to approve or disapprove such views, whatever their
nature;
rather, it shall be concerned exclusively with discharging its
educational
duty to facilitate free discussion of all points of view, to the extent
guaranteed
by the constitutions of the United States and of the State of Rhode
Island.
9.18.10 Community Standards of Behavior and University Policies
for
Students. Students and student groups are required to comply with
regulations
as published in the student handbook.
9.20.10 Disciplinary Action may be implemented only through
referral
of violations to the Office of Student Life, the Office of Campus Life,
or
the Office of Housing and Residential Life. Infractions of community
standards
and University policies shall be reported in a timely manner to the
appropriate
office by the campus police or by local police departments, by other
students,
or by faculty or staff. In all cases, the available facts shall be
gathered from the accuser (the reporting agency or complainant), and a
careful evaluation
of these facts, as well as of the dependability and character of the
person(s)
reporting them, shall be made. If corroboration of the information
presented
is deemed necessary, further inquiry and investigation shall be
undertaken.
If, at this point, in the judgment of the investigating authority,
there
is insufficient evidence of a violation, or the case lacks merit, a
decision
not to refer the matter to the conduct system may be made. #05-06--2E
9.21.10 Procedures for Cases of Violations of Community
Standards
of Behavior and University Policies. In cases in which the
investigating
authority decides that there is evidence of a violation which warrants
referral
to the conduct system, the student shall be notified in writing of the
charges.
#05-06--2E
9.21.11 Charge Letter. The notification to the student shall
include
a description of the alleged offense, the date and the location at
which
the conduct is said to have occurred, as well as reference to the
student
handbook section that is alleged to have been violated, a statement of
the
sanctions recommended, and an explanation of the options available to
the
student.
9.21.12 Response Letter. Within two working days of receipt
of
the written charges, the accused student shall respond in writing. The
response
deadline shall be extended if in view of the investigating authority,
there
are good grounds for such an extension. In his or her response, the
student
shall choose one of the following options: (1) Acceptance of
responsibility
for the alleged conduct as well as of the sanctions recommended; (2)
acceptance
of responsibility for the alleged conduct, but not of the sanctions
recommended;
and (3) denial of responsibility for the alleged conduct. If the
student
denies responsibility, the student's response shall also indicate his
or
her preference as to whether the case should be disposed of through an
administrative
hearing, or through a hearing before a hearing panel.
9.21.13 Mode of Resolution under Various Conditions. If the
accused
student accepts responsibility as well as the sanctions recommended,
the
case shall be considered as resolved, and a decision letter shall be
written
to confirm the decision. If a student accepts responsibility but does
not
accept the sanctions recommended, the case shall be referred to a
hearing
before a hearing officer, unless the nature of the infraction is such
that
a mandatory sanction is attached to it, in which case the student's
acceptance
of responsibility shall resolve the matter. If the accused student
denies
responsibility, the case shall be referred to a hearing.
9.21.14 Types of Hearings. Hearings may either be before an
administrative
officer from one of the three offices charged with responsibility of
participating
in the administration of the student conduct system (see 9.20.10), or
before
a hearing panel. They shall be known as administrative hearings and
panel
hearings, respectively. #05-06--2E
9.21.15 Administrative Hearings shall be conducted (1) if a
charged
student fails to respond to a charge letter within two working days;
(2)
if the hearing concerns the sanctions only; (3) if a student requests
an
administrative hearing; and (4) if in the judgment of the Office of
Student
Life, scheduling it is necessary to ensure that a hearing occurs in a
timely
fashion, to insure the health and safety of any of the participants or
to
insure an unbiased hearing. #04-05--32
9.21.16 Panel Hearings shall take place if an accused
student
denies responsibility for the alleged violation, requests a panel
hearing,
and none of the conditions making an administrative hearing necessary
and/or
appropriate (see 9.21.15) apply. Panel hearings shall normally take
place
before panels drawn from the conduct Board (see 5.19.10-21). When the
situation
warrants it, however, the Office of Student Life shall have the
authority
to establish special hearing panels.
9.21.17 Procedures for Panel Hearings. If the accused
student
requests a panel hearing, and the Office of Student Life concurs with
this
request, every effort shall be made to hold a hearing before the
appropriate
panel within 20 class days from the date the student furnishes his or
her
written response to the charge letter. The accused student shall
receive
written notification of the place and time of the hearing at least 72
hours
in advance of the hearing. The notification shall also identify the
panel
members. A staff member from the Office of Student Life shall be
available
prior to the hearing at the request of the student to advise him or her
regarding
the alleged violation and procedural matters. The student may challenge
the
participation of (a) panel member(s) for good cause, provided this is
done
at least 48 hours in advance of the hearing. Hearings shall be closed.
9.21.18 Information to Panel, and Disqualification of Panel
Members.
Each panel member shall be informed of the student's name and charges
at
the time of the hearing. Any panel member may disqualify
himself/herself,
and either party to the case may be permitted to disqualify a
prospective
member if s/he can satisfy the remaining members of the board that
there
is good cause for disqualification. If alternates for disqualified
panel
members are available, these alternates shall take the place of the
disqualified members. If it is not possible to replace a sufficient
number of disqualified
members to maintain the panel composition as stipulated in 5.19.20, the
hearing
may proceed only with the agreement of the charged student.
9.21.19 Advisor to the Student. During the conduct process,
including
at all hearings, the student shall have the right to the assistance of
an
advisor of his/her choice from the University community. The advisor
may
not serve as a witness, or be a party to the case. The purpose of the
advisor
is to assist the student, not to present a defense or to speak in place
of
the student. Neither party shall be permitted to employ professional
legal
counsel or other persons from outside the University community to
present
the case before the board or advise the student during the hearing.
When
a concurrent criminal charge is pending against an accused student,
however,
the student's legal counsel shall be allowed, upon the student's
request,
to provide passive assistance to the student at the hearing. #05-06--2E
9.21.20 Panel Advisor. All panels shall have an advisor
appointed
by the Office of Student Life who shall be present during all stages of
the
conduct process, including hearings and deliberations, except during
the
closed panel session determining whether or not the accused student is
responsible
for the alleged conduct. Responsibilities of the panel advisor shall
include:
(1) advising the panel regarding the requirements and provisions of
substantive
and procedural due process; (2) serving as a resource person concerning
an
accused student's past history of involvement in the discipline system
if
any; (3) providing continuity in panel operations and procedures; (4)
facilitating
the implementation of conduct procedures at all levels of the conduct
system;
(5) acting as a liaison between panels and the University community;
(6) assisting
the panel in fulfilling its educational responsibility; and (7)
preparing
a written record of each hearing which is to include a summary of the
testimony
and evidence presented, and a statement of the decision reached. The
individual
who serves as panel advisor shall not be the person who conducted the
original
investigation as described in 9.20.10 and 9.21.10.
9.21.21 Presence of Accused, Oaths, Burden of Proof, and
Standards
of Proof. The accused must be present at the hearing (except as
provided
in 9.21.26). S/he may present evidence and introduce witnesses. No
oaths
shall be requested or allowed and the technical rules of evidence
applicable
to civil and criminal cases shall not apply. The charging official and
the
chair of the panel will work to eliminate preconduct and irrelevant
information.
If the charged student feels that this has not been done, he/she can
add
a written complaint or correction to the materials that are given to
the
hearing panel or officer. When the charged student denies
responsibility,
the burden of proof shall rest upon the person(s) bringing the charges.
The
standard for this proof shall be clear and convincing evidence. #04-05--32
9.21.22 Right to Question Witnesses, Right to View Evidence, and
Rules
for Written Testimony. The accused student shall have the right to
question
the complainant and all witnesses, and to view and question all
evidence
presented to the panel during the hearing. Written testimony from
absentee
witnesses may be received for consideration only if the panel advisor
and
its chair deem it appropriate. If the panel advisor and the chair
disagree
as to the admissibility, they shall refer the matter to the panel for
disposition.
The authorship of such testimony must be verified by certification from
a
notary public.
9.21.23 Findings. Upon completion of the hearing, the
conduct
board shall make one of the following decisions: (1) a finding that the
accused
is not responsible for the alleged conduct; (2) a finding that the
accused
student is responsible for the alleged conduct, and a determination of
the
penalty; (3) dismissal of the charges due to lack of evidence; or (4)
continuance
of the case for the purpose of obtaining additional information or of
providing
for further consideration. Decisions shall be based only upon evidence
and
testimony introduced at the hearing. All decisions shall be made by a
majority
vote. The panel chair shall have the right to vote in all matters. #05-06--2E
9.21.24 Written Notification of Findings. As soon as
reasonably
possible after the finding is reached, the accused student shall be
notified
in writing of the decision(s) made.
9.21.25 Procedures for Administrative Hearings.
Administrative
hearings shall follow the applicable procedures set forth for hearings
before
hearing panels. All tasks which the panel hearing procedures assign to
the
panel chair and/or the panel advisor shall, in the case of an
administrative
hearing, devolve to the hearing officer. The charged student shall have
the
right to challenge the assignment of the case to a particular hearing
officer. Such a challenge shall follow the procedures established,
under the panel
hearing procedures, for challenging a panel member.
9.21.26 Attendance Requirement at Hearings. Charged students
are
required to appear for scheduled hearings. Failure to do so normally
causes
the case to be heard in the student's absence. However, a student shall
have
the right to one rescheduled hearing if the scheduled time causes undue
hardship.
9.21.27 Continuance of Disciplinary Proceedings. If a
student
withdraws or is academically dismissed while charges are pending,
disciplinary
procedures may be continued or discontinued at the discretion of the
Dean
of Students. If a student completing degree requirements is accused of
an
offense for which suspension or dismissal are appropriate penalties,
his/her
diploma may be withheld pending resolution of the conduct
proceedings
or during a period of suspension. #04-05--32;
#05-06--2E
9.21.28 Deferral of Proceedings. The staff of the Office of
Student
Life may defer conduct action at any stage of the process for a period
not
to exceed ninety calendar days when scool is in session. Pending
charges
may be discontinued thereafter depending upon the good conduct of the
accused
student. #04-05--32
9.21.29 Appeals Procedure. When a hearing panel or hearing
officer
recommends conduct sanction, the accused student shall have the right
to
appeal the decision to the University Appeals Board (5.20.10-12). Such
appeal
requests, which must be presented in writing, shall be based only on
evidence
of fraud, denial of rights, procedural error, or on the claim of new
evidence
which was not available at the hearing, and which would have materially
affected the decision of the hearing panel or officer. Following a
hearing, a complainant
has the right to submit an appeal request to the University Appeals
Board
based on new evidence (as described above). Appeal requests must be
filed
with the Dean of Students within one week of receipt of the letter
informing
the accused student that a conduct sanction has been recommended.
Extensions
to the deadline for filing appeal requests may be granted for good and
sufficient
reason by the Dean of Students. If the Appeals Board determines that a
written
request for appeal has merit, it shall rehear the case, or the portion
of
the case relevant to the appeal. Upon completion of the appeal hearing,
the
Appeals Board may either uphold the original decision and sanction, or
adjust
the original decision and/or sanction. Following action by the Appeals
Board,
the case shall be forwarded to the President or the Dean of Students,
as
appropriate. #05-06--2C
9.21.30 Students who obtain information at their hearing
which
might lead to new evidence shall ask for a continuance of the case at
that
time rather than wait to raise the matter for the first time as the
basis
for an appeal request.
9.21.31 Conduct Records. All conduct records, such as
complaint
letters, correspondence, charge letters, decision letters, and hearing
summaries,
shall be considered confidential, and be maintained by the Office of
Student
Life for six years after the date of the action. Records of unresolved
incidents
shall be reviewed annually starting with the 6-year anniversary. The
Dean
of Students shall decide whether or not to destroy such a record or
keep it
for another year. Records of permanent dismissal shall be retained
permanently.
Access to such records is governed by the University Policies for the
Release
and Disclosure of Information from Student Records (see section
6.12.21).
#04-05--32
9.22.10 Range of Conduct Action. Actions which may be taken
as
a consequence of violations shall range from no further action to
dismissal.
Conditions may be attached to the action depending upon, and
appropriate
to, the nature and severity of the violation, the degree to which the
student
has participated or been involved, his/her motivations and intent in
connection
with the infraction, and any record of past violations as well as a
consideration
of all facets of the specific situation. Actions listed in Sections
9.22.11
through 9.22.16 shall not take effect until approved by the Dean of
Students.
#05-06--2E
9.22.11 No Further Action. In cases where the discussion
with
the administrative officer or the hearing before the appropriate
student
conduct board has been sufficient, the student will be notified that
there
is no further action necessary. #04-05--32
9.22.12 Warning. In instances of minor violations, the
student
may be warned in writing of the possible consequences of continuing
such
behavior. Additional conditions may be applied as appropriate.
9.22.14 Residence Probation. A student who is placed on
residence
probation is not in good standing with his/her living unit for a
specified
period of time, and conditions may be placed on his/her actions. The
status
of residence probation reminds the student that his/her infraction has
become
part of his/her record and that repetition of similar or other
unacceptable
behavior may be cause for removal from the living unit.
9.22.15 Removal from Living Unit. This action precludes
either
the student's continued residence in a particular living unit or in any
campus
living unit. Such action is normally be taken after one serious
violation
or repeated minor violations related to the living unit environment.
9.22.16 Disciplinary Probation. A student who is placed on
disciplinary
probation is permitted to remain enrolled at the University under
certain
stated conditions, depending upon the nature of the violation and the
potential
learning value that may be derived from such conditions. The probation
usually
extends over a stated period, during which it is clearly understood
that
the student is subject to further disciplinary action, including
suspension
or dismissal, if he/she violates the terms of the probation or in any
way
fails to conduct himself/herself as a responsible member of the
University
community. Probation is a final warning to the student to help him/her
reevaluate
his/her behavior.
9.22.17 Suspension is an involuntary separation of the
student
from the institution. Suspension differs from dismissal because it
implies
and states a time limit when return will be possible. Suspension may
extend
for a semester, for a specified period, until a specifically designated
date,
or until a stated condition is met. Such action does not take effect
until
approved by the President of the University.
9.22.18 Dismissal is the permanent involuntary separation of
the
student from the institution. Such action does not take effect until
approved
by the President of the University.
9.23.10 Emergency Suspension. Pending final action on
violation
of University regulations, the status of a student shall not be altered
or
his/her right to be present on the campus and to attend classes
suspended,
except for reasons of imminent danger to his/her physical or emotional
safety
or well-being, or for reasons of imminent danger to the safety or
well-being
of the University community. The decision to separate a student from
the
campus under these conditions shall be made only with the approval of
the
Vice President for Student Affairs or the President. If a student
is separated from campus under this authority,
the
procedures outlined in 9.21.10-30 shall be implemented only if the
suspended
student requests in writing that it be done. If a hearing is requested,
every
effort shall be made to schedule it within 15 class days after the
separation.
A student separated from campus by this authority must remain separated
until
a hearing is held. If more than one semester elapses from the time of
the suspension to the time the student requests a hearing, the hearing
shall
be an administrative one. #05-06--2B
#07-08--34
9.24.10 Jurisdiction of
the
Student Discipline System over Off-Campus Conduct. Off-campus
conduct
shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the Student Discipline System
if
one of the following conditions is met: 1) an infraction of a
community
standard of behavior as listed in the STUDENT HANDBOOK occurs at:
a)
an official University event, such as a field trip; b) a University
sanctioned
event as defined in Section 8.51.12 of the UNIVERSITY MANUAL; or c) an
event
sponsored by a recognized student organization, fraternity or sorority;
or
2) an off-campus action performed by a person while he or she is a
student
is of a nature such that it would be subject to the Student Discipline
System
if it had occurred on campus, and the nature and circumstances of the
infraction
provide reasonable grounds for believing that the alleged offender
posed
or poses a threat to life, health, or safety of the University
community,
or to University property the safety of self or others or if the
alleged
offender is repeatedly arrested or cited for violating local, state or
federal
laws. The decision to apply jurisdiction to off-campus conduct
shall
be made by the Dean of Students. #05-06--2A
9.24.11 Appeal on the Issue of Off-Campus Jurisdiction. If a
student
is accused of an off-campus offense under subsection 2 of Section
9.24.10,
and if the representative of the Office of Student Life determines that
there
is cause for presenting the matter to the Student Discipline System,
the
student shall have the right to dispute the jurisdiction of the Student
Discipline
System. Such an appeal must be filed in writing with the Office of
Student
Life not later than three days after notice of the Office of Student
Life decision that the student be charged. The appeal shall be
presented to the
Vice President for Student Affairs for disposition of the issue of
jurisdiction. The decision on jurisdiction arrived at by the Vice
President for Student Affairs shall be final. When an affirmative
judgment on
jurisdiction has been reached through this procedure, the student shall
still
have the right to accept or deny responsibility for the conduct in
question.
9.25.10 Mediation. When there is an apparent violation of
community
standards or University policies for students, the incident may be
adjudicated
through a formal mediation process if formal mediation is acceptable to
all
of the following parties: (1) the individual(s) allegedly responsible
for
the violation; (2) the complainant (student, staff or department
reporting
the violation), and (3) the Office of Student Life. Mediation shall be
conducted
by a trained University staff member approved by the Office of Student
Life.
Mediation requires the cooperation of all parties to resolve a problem.
The
process is to result in a written document agreed to by all parties.
The
written agreement shall be kept on file in the Office of Student Life.
Should
Mediation fail to result in an agreement, or should a party fail to
abide
by an agreement, formal disciplinary proceedings shall then be
initiated.