UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND
Kingston, Rhode Island
FACULTY SENATE
MINUTES
Faculty Senate Executive Committee Meeting #1 -- June 2,
2003
1. The meeting was called to order at 1:00 p.m. on Monday, June
2, 2003 in the third floor conference room in Green Hall, Chairperson
Beckman presiding. All members were present.
2. The minutes of 2002-03 Executive Committee Meeting #27, May 6,
2003, were approved.
3. The Executive Committee was brought up to date on the
following matters of business that had been considered previously:
a. URI Wireless Network Policy: Ms Grubman reported
that Vice Provost Gandel had indicated to her that the proposed
policy would have a minimal effect on faculty and other members of
the university community. Senator Boudreaux-Bartels agreed to find
out which, if any, devices used at the university would be affected
by the policy.
The Executive Committee agreed that once it is determined which
devices are affected, they would inform the university community on
FacSen-Bus about the policy and its adoption by the University.
b. Release Time: The Executive Committee discussed President
Carothers' statement agreeing to provide one course release time for
each of the members of the Executive Committee who were not already
entitled to release time by statute. Chairperson Beckman and Ms.
Grubman were asked to meet with the Provost to clarify how the
release time would be implemented.
c. JSPC: The Executive Committee discussed the May 28 meeting of
the JSPC. Ms. Grubman asked members of the committee to offer
suggestions or additions to her draft minutes of the meeting. It was
agreed that once the minutes were approved by the JSPC they would be
posted on FacSen-Bus. In addition, the minutes would be printed in
the Senate Agenda along with minutes of the Executive Committee and
time for questions would be set-aside at each Senate meeting.
4. Announcements/Correspondence:
a. Chairperson Beckman reported on the May 23 meeting
of the Board of Governors Academic and Student Affairs Committee. She
said that each of the three institutions had described their
retention efforts and noted that Dean Richmond and Assistant Dean
Salamone had made a presentation on behalf of URI. She said that she
had asked for a copy of URI's power point presentation, including a
series of graphs, and would provide them to the members of the
Executive Committee as soon as they were downloaded.
The Executive Committee agreed to invite Deans Richmond and
Salamone to make their presentation to the Faculty Senate in the
fall.
b. The January-February-March 2003 edition of URI In the News was
circulated for information Ms. Grubman said that the Faculty Senate
Office received the materials on a regular basis and indicated that
she would share them with the Executive Committee as they became
available.
c. The Executive Committee discussed a memorandum dated May 27
from Dean Richmond requesting that that the Faculty Senate Executive
Committee, acting for the Senate during the summer, permit the
elimination of the 60 credit prerequisite for internships.
Following discussion, the Executive Committee asked Ms. Grubman
to write to Dean Richmond on their behalf informing her that the
Executive Committee had agreed that it would be inappropriate for
them to act on her request. She was asked to explain that the
Executive Committee's authority to act on behalf of the Faculty
Senate during the summer is very limited under the provisions of
Section 4.3 of the Senate By-Laws:
4.3 The Executive Committee shall have the power to
act for the Senate during the interim between the last Senate meeting
in the spring and the first meeting in the fall on such matters as
urgently require action at the time. Before acting, the Chairperson
shall invite members of the Senate to a hearing concerning the action
and its urgency. The provisions for circulating the agenda and
minutes for special meetings of the Senate shall apply. The action of
the Executive Committee will become effective ten days following the
distribution of the minutes unless a necessary Presidential approval
is withheld or unless a petition for challenges the action delay
signed by five percent of the General Faculty. In these cases, the
action must await consideration by the Senate.
In addition, Ms. Grubman was directed to inform Dean Richmond
that since her request was a curricular matter it would require
action through the appropriate curricular channels, including
deliberation by the Curricular Affairs Committee and the Faculty
Senate.
5. Ms Grubman reviewed with the Executive Committee their
specific responsibilities during the summer:
a. Reviewing and approving the CBUM Report on changes
to the UNIVERSITY MANUAL based upon Faculty Senate legislation during
the 2002-03 academic year, which usually takes place in July;
b. Appointing members to various Senate and University
committees, which usually begins in July.
c. Developing an agenda for the 2003-04 Faculty Senate. It was
agreed that this could be developed as they meet over the summer. The
Executive Committee agreed that shared governance would continue to
be a priority
d Planning the Agenda for Faculty Senate Meeting #1, which will
be held on September 25, 2003.
6. Ms. Grubman asked members of the Executive Committee to
provide her with their schedules for fall 2003 by their next meeting
so they can establish a regular meeting date and time for the fall.
Ms. Grubman explained that it has been the Executive Committee's
practice to meet regularly with President Carothers and Provost Swan.
She said that she would schedule the meetings as soon as a meeting
time was established. Ms. Grubman suggested that the Executive
Committee might want to schedule meetings with Vice President Stark
and Vice Provosts Gandel and Trubatch at least once during the
academic year.
7. The Executive Committee reviewed the following topics, which
had been identified by the 2002-2003 Executive Committee as matters
of continuing interest:
a. Centennial Scholarships: Chairperson Beckman and
Vice Chairperson Hollinshead explained to the new members of the
Executive Committee that the previous committee had spoken with
President Carothers about the how Centennial Scholars are selected
and the President had agreed to explore with Dean Taggart the
possibility of considering other guidelines for awarding the
scholarships.
It was agreed to include Centennial Scholarships as a discussion
topic for their first meeting with the President.
b. The qualitative accompaniment/supplement to the PCA: Ms.
Grubman reported that she had spoken briefly with the Provost about
the PCA accompaniment and had been assured that it had been approved.
Ms. Grubman was asked to encourage the Provost to send copies of the
format to department heads so they can have a vehicle for providing a
context for the PCA data about their departments.
c. Recommendation regarding the option of admitting freshmen
directly out of high school to the Providence Campus: Ms Grubman said
that she hadn't been able to discuss the membership of the committee
with the Provost but indicated that she would continue to pursue the
matter as requested by the Ad Hoc Committee on Admissions Policy in
their final report.
d. The Metropolitan College/Urban Initiative: The Executive
Committee agreed that, whatever the permutation, this would continue
to be an issue for 2003-04.
e. Improving the University's public relations effort with regard
to academic programs: The Executive Committee considered the
possibility of bringing a brief report on academic programs to the
Board of Governors during the open forum portion of each of their
meetings during the 2003-04 academic year.
f. The analysis of the costs-benefits of athletics by the
subcommittee of the Athletics Advisory Board, chaired by Professor
Ramstad: The Executive Committee agreed that it would be useful to
have the results of the study as the University attempts to set
priorities for resources.
The meeting was adjourned at 3:15 p.m.
Respectfully
submitted,
Sheila Black Grubman
SBG:DD