UNIVERSITY
OF RHODE ISLAND
Kingston, Rhode Island
FACULTY SENATE
MINUTES
Faculty Senate Executive
Committee Meeting #3 – September 11, 2007
1. The meeting was called to
order at 8:35 a.m. on Tuesday, September 11, 2007 in the third floor
conference room in Green Hall, Chairperson Miller presiding. All
members were present except Senator Fastovsky.
2. The Minutes of Executive
Committee Meeting #2, August 21, 2007 were approved.
3. Announcements/Correspondence:
a.
The Executive Committee discussed a request from Academic Affairs to
change the University Calendar for Fall 2008. The
reason for the request was that the advising day for
fall semester is scheduled for the Friday before Labor Day, which would
require additionalexpenditures
for opening and staffing the residence and dining halls and present
serious problems for students whose leases don’t begin until after
Labor Day.
It was noted that while section
8.70.14 limits the ability to revise a calendar to no less than 18
months, the matter was of such a serious nature that the Senate should
be asked to make an exception for this situation. The Executive
Committee reviewed the relevant sections of the UNIVERSITY MANUAL and
found a number of possible solutions to the problem. Ms. Grubman
was asked to contact Senator DiCioccio, the Chair of the Academic
Standards and Calendar Committee and request that the committee hold an
emergency meeting to discuss the various options for revising the fall
2008 calendar and to bring a revised calendar to the Senate as early as
possible in the fall semester.
b. Chairperson Miller reported
that Vice Provost Pasquerella had raised concerns regarding faculty who
won’t allow students to add courses during the “add period.” Discussion
ensued with regard to the faculty members’ reasons for taking this
action and the consequences of not having courses available for
transfer students and others who need them. Questions were raised
as to whether shortening the add period might resolve this problem.
Following discussion, the Executive Committee agreed that the issue
should be forwarded to the Academic Standards and Calendar Committee
for their consideration.
c. Ms. Grubman reported that she
had not been able to schedule a meeting with Vice Provost Bozylinsky
because he had commitments on all of the remaining Tuesdays this
fall. The Executive Committee asked Ms. Grubman to schedule a
lunch meeting at a time when most members of the FSEC could attend.
4. The Executive Committee was
brought up-to-date on the following matters of continuing concern:
a.
Lab Fees: The Executive
Committee agreed that they should take a stronger stand regarding the
inappropriateness of charging laboratory fees for lecture courses.
Chairperson Miller reported that
Senator Fastovsky had agreed to bring forward a motion on the lab fees
for consideration at their next meeting.
b. Searches: Chairperson Miller said
that he had inquired about the progress of the search for the Provost
and Vice President for Academic Affairs and had been informed that the
committee was in the process of narrowing down the list of potential
candidates. He said they were working very quickly because the
President wanted the new Provost to begin in January and did not want
to appoint an interim Provost.
Chairperson Miller said that he
and Professor Donna Meyer of MCE had been appointed by the Senate to
serve on the search committee for Dean of the College of
Engineering. He explained that the committee, chaired by Dean
Farmer had begun its work.
The Executive Committee
discussed their potential faculty appointees to the Search Committee
for Dean of the College of Pharmacy and agreed that they would appoint
a representative from each of the departments in the College of
Pharmacy: one from Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences (BPS) and the
second from Pharmacy Practice (PHP).
c. Administrator Evaluation:
Chairperson Miller reported that the ad hoc committee had considered
suggestions from members of the Council of Deans and had made some,
mostly editorial, changes based on the suggestions. He said that
the final report had been enclosed with the Agenda for that meeting and
would be included on the Agenda for the Faculty Senate’s September 27
meeting.
d. Revision to Policy #80-1: Ms.
Grubman reported that comments and questions about the policy had been
forwarded to Ms. Costa and herself after the policy was posted on the
web. She explained that the suggestions had not been substantive; they
were requests to clarify language in the procedure. Ms. Grubman said
that Ms. Costa will review the suggestions with Vice President Weygand
before any modifications were made.
5. The Executive Committee
reviewed the list of Committees and noted that very few positions were
still vacant.
6. The Executive Committee
reviewed their Draft Report to Faculty Senate on Manual and By-Laws
changes and made suggestions for revisions.
7. The Executive
Committee considered the preliminary draft Agenda for Faculty Senate
Meeting #1, September 27, 2007. Ms. Grubman said that they would
be able to approve the final form at their next meeting.
8. The Executive Committee
discussed the JSPC orientation meeting that they had attended the
previous week. They agreed that differences between tactical
planning and strategic planning should be addressed.
The Executive Committee also
agreed that in light of the administration’s strategy of admitting more
and more students in order to balance the University’s budget, they
should play the leadership role in assuring that academic quality
issues don’t get ignored. Concerns were raised about the
proliferation of online courses without quality controls. Ms.
Grubman reminded the FSEC that the CAC had begun to require that all
online courses be approved before they are offered. They also noted
that concerns about large classes, faculty advising, and strategies for
retaining students must be addressed at the same time.
The meeting was adjourned at
10:14 a.m.
Respectfully
submitted,
Sheila Black
Grubman