UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND

Kingston, Rhode Island

FACULTY SENATE

MINUTES


Faculty Senate Executive Committee Meeting #15 – December 7, 2004


1.    The meeting was called to order at 1:05 p.m. on Tuesday, December 7, 2004 in the third floor conference room in Green Hall, Chairperson Boudreaux-Bartels presiding.  All members were present.

2.    The minutes of Executive Committee Meeting #14, November 30, 2004 were reviewed and draft minutes from Meeting #13, November 23, 2004 were distributed.  It was agreed to approve the minutes of Meeting #14 tentatively pending comments or suggestions from the Provost and to consider the minutes from Meeting #13 at their next meeting.

3.    Announcements/Correspondence:

a.    Vice Chairperson Rosen reported on the December 6, 2004 meeting of the Board of Governors. He said that he missed most of the Open Forum, but had arrived as student leaders from URI were completing a request that the Board not place the burden of the Ryan Center debt on URI students. Senator Rosen said that no discussion or comments from members of the Board of Governors had followed the students’ remarks.

Senator Rosen said that the three reports of the Academic and Student Affairs Committee were approved. Of greatest significance to the University were revisions to Regulations Governing Academic Changes in Rhode Island Public Institutions of Higher Education.  He also noted that the Board had approved the Commissioner’s recommendation on the delegation of authority when action was necessary during periods when the Board does not meet.  In addition, Senator Rosen said that the Board had approved two recommendations that would have an impact on renovations at URI.

Senator Rosen also noted that President Carothers reported on the proposal to initiate sponsorship of a new Charter High School in Rhode Island.  He said there was an article on the proposal in that morning’s edition of The Providence Journal.  He said that the Board had been informed that RIC has developed a strategic plan and that CCRI has been reaccredited by NEASC.

b.    Ms. Grubman announced that Executive Committee meetings during the spring 2005 semester would be held on Wednesdays from 1-3 p.m.  The Executive Committee agreed to hold their first meeting of the spring semester on Wednesday, January 19, 2005.

c.    The Council of Deans’ Agenda for December 8, 2004 was circulated for information.

d.    Ms. Grubman reported that she had requested and received a list of members of the URI Foundation Executive Board.  She circulated the list for information and indicated that copies of the most recent issue of Horizons had been forwarded as well.

e.    Chairperson Boudreaux-Bartels announced that she would be away from campus at the beginning of the following week and Vice Chairperson Rosen had agreed to chair the December 14 meeting in her absence.

4.    The Executive Committee reviewed the Agenda for Faculty Senate Meeting #4, December 9, 2004, in preparation for the meeting.

5.    The Executive Committee considered the following matters of continuing concern:

a.    JSPC:  The Executive Committee discussed the previous meeting of the JSPC, which had been held on December 2.  They agreed that the discussion of their proposal for an administrative facilitator had been positive.  Chairperson Boudreaux-Bartels reported that after the meeting Mr. Bakr and Ms. Morrissey indicated that they would develop a process for implementation of the proposal. Assistant Provost Katz’ suggested that a group of three high level and knowledgeable administrators might serve as resource people for advice in unusual situations.

They also discussed the Charter High School proposal and agreed that they had a number of questions for President Carothers about the University’s role in its establishment and continuation.

b.    The Murphy Program Review Model:  Senators Martin and Rice and Chairperson Boudreaux-Bartels agreed to meet the next day to review the questions and responses and make suggestions for improving their clarity.   Senator Ramsay indicated that she had also reviewed the questions and had made some editorial suggestions as well.

Chairperson Boudreaux-Bartels reported that President Carothers had met with Mr. Murphy to discuss his model further and that he had appeared to be reassured about the model’s usefulness in making financial decisions.  The Executive Committee agreed to pursue the issue when they meet with President Carothers on December 14.

c.    Committees:  The Executive Committee was brought up to date on the activities of Senate Committees.  

1)    Ms. Grubman reported that the Curricular Affairs Committee had met on December 6 and had approved both the transfer of the department of biological sciences and the ad hoc committee’s recommendation for programs for traditional students at the Providence campus.  She said that she expected both recommendations would be included on the Agenda for the January 27 Faculty Senate meeting.

2)    Ms. Grubman said that she had contacted Professor Loy, chair of the Academic Standards and Calendar Committee, and had informed him of the Executive Committee’s concerns and suggestions with regard to the University Calendar proposal for 2005-06 through 2010-11.  

3)    Ms. Grubman agreed to schedule a meeting of the Executive Committee with the Constitution, By-Laws and University Manual Committee for early in the spring semester to discuss the CBUM Committee’s response to Senate Action #03-04--6 “CBUM Committee Directed to Consider Changes to the Constitution and By-Laws of the Faculty Senate.”

4)    Chairperson Boudreaux-Bartels announced that the Ad Hoc Committee on Graduate Education and Research had developed a questionnaire for department chairs on the various forms of service performed by Graduate Assistants and graduate students and had sent them to academic department chairs.


5)    Chairperson Boudreaux-Bartels asked that the Executive Committee devote time at the following meeting to considering who they might recommend as the Faculty Senate’s appointee to the Master Plan Review Team.  She suggested that someone from the Executive Committee, or a faculty member who has had experience on the Senate and has a broad perspective of the University as a whole, might be an appropriate appointee.

6.    The Executive Committee agreed to the following topics for their December 14 meeting with President Carothers:

a.    Follow-up on the Executive Committee’s recommendation to the JSPC:

1)     Update, clarify, and codify administrative rules, regulations and forms

2)     Create flowcharts depicting necessary steps in routine paperwork and approval processes,

3)     Establish in each unit a relatively high level, administrative person who can respond to process and procedural questions, especially those of an unusual nature, and review systems to recommend appropriate modifications to aid in ease of use.

b.    How did the President’s recent meeting with Tom Murphy impact his thinking about using the Murphy Program Review Model for making financial decisions and for program review?

c.    More information about the proposed charter high school from the perspective of the University:

1)    University resources required for the fundraising activities anticipated.

2)    Plans to Integrate with URI's School of Education and other units of the University

d.    What are the administration’s plans with regard to improving the financial health of the University in light of a declining State appropriation:

1) Long-term plan for lobbying Legislature

2) Alternative funding sources

3)    Status of RCM plans at URI.  Is a presentation to Faculty Senate appropriate in near future?

7.    The Executive Committee discussed an issue raised by Senator Kowalski about the programming limitations of e-campus with regard to course prerequisites and inherent lack of flexibility associated with their interpretation.  It was agreed that the Executive Committee should ask the Curricular Affairs Committee to review the matter and recommend a policy with regard to the implementation of approved prerequisites.

8.    Senator Martin suggested that everyone read the November-December 2004 issue of Academe, which had ‘family responsibilities and academic work’ as its theme.

The meeting was adjourned at 3:00 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

                                    

Sheila Black Grubman