UNIVERSITY
OF RHODE ISLAND
Kingston, Rhode Island
FACULTY SENATE
MINUTES
Faculty Senate Executive
Committee Meeting #28 – April 21, 2008
1. The meeting was called to
order at 9:10 a.m. on Monday, April 21, 2008 in the President’s
Conference Room in Green Hall, Chairperson Miller presiding. All
members were present except Senator Ordonez.
2. The Minutes for Executive
Committee Meetings #25, March 31, 2008 and #26, April 7, 2008 were
approved.
3. The Executive Committee
reviewed the Agenda for Faculty Senate Meeting #8, April 24, 2008 in
preparation for the meeting later in the week.
When President Carothers
arrived, the Executive Committee moved to the next item on the Agenda.
4. The Executive Committee met
with President Carothers from 9:30 to 10:20 a.m. The following
matters were considered:
a.
Blue Ribbon Study Commission:
President Carothers and the Executive Committee discussed the most
recent iteration of the charge to the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission. President Carothers said that he thought there was
too much emphasis on “Land Grant” and he wanted Professor Rice to
consider the lack of state and local funding for land grant activities
when he revises the charge. He noted that URI cannot expect an
improvement in state and local support in the future and that he hoped
the Commission would explore ways to mesh the University’s resources
with future needs.
President Carothers said that he
had asked Vice President Alfonso to forward more recent articles than
the ones cited in the draft and had asked Ms. Morrissey to work with
Professor Rice to revise the charge further. He said that the
University had to look into the social and cultural climate in the next
decade and
The Executive Committee
indicated that they had asked Vice Chairperson Martin to work on the
revisions as well and hoped the charge would be ready for the May 15
Faculty Senate Meeting.
b. Next year’s budget: In
response to a question from the Executive Committee, President
Carothers reported that 46 faculty members and 21 members of the staff
had decided to take the retirement package. He said that the best
prediction at that time was that about $6,000,000 would be saved.
However, vacancies would have to be filled in areas such as Nursing,
while other units might find compelling reasons to merge or realign
themselves. He said that most of the divisions had made serious
cuts in their budgets and that he was aware that Provost DeHayes was
working with the Deans on their significantly reduced budgets. He
said that he believed that the Deans’ budgets would be out shortly.
c. Special Programs for Talent Development:
The Executive Committee asked the President whether there had ever been
a formal assessment of the Talent Development Program. President
Carothers said that in the past, there weren’t good data on graduation
rates for students in Talent Development, but that there was an effort
to begin gathering them. He said that the decision had been made
for the first time to limit admission to the TD Program and invest in
better financial support for fewer students.
d. 2008-09 Executive Committee:
In response to the Executive Committee’s request for suggestions to
pass on to the next Executive Committee, President Carothers said that
the next Executive Committee should be involved in the Search for a new
President. He also said that he hoped that the FSEC would devote
some effort to responding to the issues raised by NEASC in its Report
and letter. He said that there was a relatively short time for
the University to move ahead with merging strategic planning with
budgeting because NEASC expected a report in 2010 on the University’s
progress in this area.
Before he left the meeting,
President Carothers informed the Executive Committee that the memorial
service for Mary Ellen "Molly" Offer was scheduled for 4:30 p.m. in the
Catholic Center.
When President Carothers left
the meeting, the Executive Committee resumed its discussion of the
April 24 Faculty Senate Agenda, after which, they moved to the next
order of business.
5. The Executive Committee was
brought up-to-date on the following matters of continuing concern:
a.
Administrator Evaluation:
Ms. Grubman reported that the evaluations of Vice Provost McCray and
Dean Richmond were moving ahead. She said that she and Senator
Rosen had met with the Vice Provost McCray Administrator Evaluation
Committee (AEC) on April 17 to review the ground rules for the
evaluation and to emphasize the confidentiality of the process.
Ms. Grubman said that the AEC
for Dean Richmond was scheduled to hold their initial meeting on
Monday, April 28.
b. Blue Ribbon Study Commission:
Vice Chairperson Martin reported that the revised draft of the Blue
Ribbon Study Commission Charge would probably undergo further revision
based on the issues raised by President Carothers earlier in the
meeting.
The Executive Committee
discussed what informal role they might take in appointing members to
the Commission in light of the late date (May 15) at which the charge
would be approved.
c. Committees: Ms. Grubman
informed the FSEC that she expected that the report of the Academic
Program Review Committee (APRC) would be on the May 15 Faculty Senate
Agenda. Also on the Agenda, would be the first report of the
Learning Outcomes Oversight Committee (LOOC) the Providence Campus
Oversight Committee (PCUIC) and the UCGE Committee Report on URI 101.
d. Four-credit courses: The
Executive Committee discussed the possibility of charging the CAC to
investigate the pros and cons of moving to a 4-credit system.
6. The Executive Committee
considered President Carothers’ suggestion that the 2008-09 FSEC be
asked to actively follow-up on the NEASC recommendations. Ms.
Grubman said that she would forward the NEASC accreditation letter of
April 3 and any relevant portions of the Report and the University’s
response to it.
The meeting was adjourned at
10:58 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Sheila Black Grubman