NUMBER 6
UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND
FACULTY SENATE
MINUTES
Faculty Senate Meeting February
24, 2005
1. The
regular meeting of the Faculty Senate was called to order at 3:06 p.m.
in the Cherry Auditorium, Chester Kirk Building, Chairperson Boudreaux-Bartels presiding.
All
members were present except Senators Barbour, Cohen, Dicioccio, Ferszt, Ginis, Hu, Kirschenbaum, Manfredi, Oviatt,
Preece, Rowinski and Tyrell; Vice Presidents Beagle and Dougan; Deans
Farmer, Joseph, Letendre, Mazze, Richmond and Taggart, (Dean Seemann
was represented by his designee); Mr. Sutherland and Mr. Lopes.
2. Chairperson
Boudreaux-Bartels asked if there were any additions or corrections to
or questions about the Minutes of Faculty
Senate Meeting #5, January 27,
2005. There were none.
Chairperson Boudreaux-Bartels ruled
that in the absence of additions or corrections, the Minutes were
approved as distributed.
3. REPORTS
OF OFFICERS AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
A. Announcements:
1) Chairperson
Boudreaux-Bartels announced that a series of workshops, facilitated by Dr. Peggy Maki on Student
Learning Outcomes Assessment, have been scheduled for later this
spring. She said that each of the workshops will be held at the
University Club and is intended for faculty members who have specific
interests and concerns. Following are the
dates and times of the workshops:
Thursday, March 3rd, University Club
8 - 11 a.m. Accredited Programs
Refining Assessment plans, tools & evaluations. This is geared for
intermediate to advanced audiences.
2 - 4:30 p.m. Assessment 101. This is
for novice assessment audiences.
Chairperson Boudreaux-Bartels said
that the following workshops focus on assessment plans, tools and
evaluations and are geared to novice and intermediate audiences:
Tuesday, March 22nd, University Club
8 - 11 a.m. Science Programs
2 - 4:30 p.m. Social Science
Programs
Thursday, April 7th, University Club
8 - 11 a.m. Arts & Humanities Programs
2 - 4:30 p.m. Co-Curricular Programs
Chairperson Boudreaux-Bartels encouraged
members of the Senate to note that additional workshops have been
scheduled for
the following dates,
topics and times to be announced:
Thursday, May 26th, University Club
Friday, October 7th, University Club
Friday, December 2nd - all three institutions, location to
be announced.
2) Chairperson
Boudreaux-Bartels reported that the Executive Committee was concerned
that reports for Senate Agenda are received in adequate time to be
included in the printed Agenda. She said
that reports were due in the Faculty Senate Office fifteen days before
the scheduled meeting and that this deadline applies to web based
materials as well as printed items.
Chairperson Boudreaux-Bartels said
that the Executive Committee was considering the pros and cons of
printing only the Agenda cover and having enclosures solely on the web
and not in printed form. She encouraged Senators to forward their
comments and suggestions about the possibility of such a change to
members of the Executive Committee.
3) Chairperson
Boudreaux-Bartels thanked Dean Nassersharif from the College of
Engineering who was the sponsor of the reception that afternoon. She
encouraged everyone to gather at
the University Club after the meeting.
B. Vice Chairperson Rosen said that the minutes
of Executive Committee Meetings #17, #18, and #19 appeared on
pages 3-13 of the Agenda. He asked if
there were any questions.
President Carothers, Provost Swan,
Chairperson Boudreaux-Bartels, Vice Chairperson Rosen and Professor
Loy, Chair of the Academic Standards and Calendar Committee, all responded
to questions about the minutes.
C. Vice Chairperson Rosen announced that the
minutes from the Joint Strategic Planning Committee's December 2, 2004
meeting appeared on pages 14-15 of the Agenda. He asked if there were
any questions. There were none.
D. Chairperson Boudreaux-Bartels announced that Vice
Chairperson Rosen had no recommendations on behalf of the Executive
Committee at that time.
E. Senator Kowalski reported on the results of
the Executive Committee's survey, which appeared on pages 16 to 21 of
the Agenda.
Discussion ensued.
Following discussion, Senator
Kowalski moved
approval of the following resolution recommended by the Executive
Committee which had been changed editorially from the one that appeared
on page
17 at the request of a Senator who could not be present at the meeting:
(see underlined)
Resolved, that the 2005-06 Faculty
Senate Executive Committee and subsequent FSEC's
*are urged to continue development of
survey instruments to help identify major concerns of faculty,
students, staff, and administrators;
*are urged to enlist the help of
faculty experts in the design, development, and administration of such
instruments;
*are urged to retain some form of
open
endedness in the instruments;
*are urged to consider administering
such instruments during the spring semester of each academic year;
*are urged to distribute the results
generally as well as to specific individuals and campus organizations
which may
be able to make use of or respond to them;
*and are urged to consider the
results of
surveys to help guide the activities of this and future FSECs
and Senates.
Discussion ensued.
Following discussion, the resolution carried.
4. REPORT
OF THE PRESIDENT
A. President Carothers noted, as indicated on the
Agenda, that he had approved all of the legislation forwarded to him
after the last Faculty Senate Meeting. He
said that two of the bills #04-05--10 and 04-05--12
would follow the regular approval process through the Board of
Governors. He noted that Bill #04-05--9 was being
brought forward under a shortened procedure that might make the process
more expeditious. He expressed his
appreciation for Commissioner Warner's help in moving the proposal
forward.
B. President Carothers said that he had attended a press conference that morning with Senator Reed with regard to Pell grants and other aspects of funding for higher education. He also said that he had been in Washington recently and had an opportunity to meet with legislators and representatives of the US Department of Education.
He reported on President Bush's
budget
as it affects higher education. He noted
that
while the federal agenda is focused on access, those programs which
have
traditionally helped disadvantaged students, such as the Perkins Loan
and
Grant programs, are being eliminated. In addition, eligibility for Pell
Grants
is becoming more difficult.
President Carothers said that there
appeared to be an effort to extend the 'No Child Left Behind' concept
to higher education, which was reflected in a great deal of concern
about the difficulty most students have transferring credits from one
institution to another nationally.
President Carothers and Provost Swan
then responded to questions from members of the Senate.
5. REPORTS
OF STANDING AND SPECIAL COMMITTEES
A. Vice Provost Trubatch presented Curricular
Report No. 2004-05-3 from the Graduate Council to the Faculty Senate,
which appeared on pages 22-23 of the Agenda.
Vice Provost Trubatch noted that
Section I, including item A in Section II was informational and asked
if there were any questions. There were
none.
Vice Provost Trubatch moved approval
of the following motion which appeared as Section II B:
The Graduate Council recommends that
a new
classification category be developed for any new program such as
post-baccalaureate certificate programs where no additional funding
resources are necessary.
Discussion ensued.
Following discussion, Senator
Kowalski moved
to refer the recommendation to the Constitution, By-Laws and University
Manual
Committee for consideration and a recommendation for appropriate
language.
After discussion, an instruction to
consult with the Graduate Council to clarify the intended language was
added to the motion editorially.
Following discussion, the motion to
refer item B to the Constitution, By-Laws and University Manual
Committee with instructions carried.
B. Vice Provost Trubatch introduced Curricular Report No. 2004-05-3A from the Graduate Council to the Faculty Senate: Proposal for a Doctor of Physical Therapy Degree which appeared on pages 25 to 37 of the Agenda.
Vice Provost Trubatch moved approval
of the Graduate Council's recommendation that the proposal for the DPT degree be approved in the Class A*category.
Discussion ensued.
Following discussion, the motion
carried.
C. Vice Provost Trubatch introduced Curricular Report No. 2004-05-4 from the Graduate Council to the Faculty Senate, which appeared on page 38 of the Agenda. She said that Section I was informational and asked if there were any questions. There were none.
Vice
Provost Trubatch said that Section II required confirmation and moved
its approval. The motion carried.
D. Vice
Provost Trubatch introduced Curricular Report No. 2004-05-5 from the
Graduate Council to the Faculty Senate, which appeared on pages 39 to 42 of the
Agenda. She said that Section I was informational and asked if there
were any questions. There were none.
Vice
Provost Trubatch said that Section II required confirmation and moved
its approval. The motion carried.
E. Vice
Provost Trubatch introduced Curricular Report No. 2004-05-5A from the
Graduate Council to the Faculty Senate: Proposal for a Ph.D. in
Computer Science Degree,
which appeared on pages 43-57 of the
Agenda.
Vice Provost Trubatch moved the Graduate Council's recommendation that the proposal for the Ph.D. in Computer Science Degree be approved. She said that in the absence of approval of the Council's recommendation for a new category for programs that had no additional resources attached to them, the proposal was recommended in the Class A* category.
Following
discussion, the motion carried.
F.
Professor Loy introduced the Academic Standards and Calendar
Committee Report #04-05-2, which appeared on page 58 of the Agenda. He
explained that the recommendation was for a proposed Summer Session
Calendar for 2006
only, noting that the Summer Session Calendar for 2005 had been approved.
Professor Loy then moved approval of
the proposed Summer Session Calendar for 2006.
Discussion ensued.
Following discussion, the motion
carried. (The approved calendar for summer 2006 is attached to the
Minutes of this meeting.)
6. SPECIAL
REPORT
Chairperson Boudreaux-Bartels
introduced Ms. Anne Newman, the University Planner, who presented a
Report on the Classroom Utilization Study. Ms. Newman used a
series of slides and responded to questions about the classroom study.
Ms. Newman then reported on the
Policy on
Allocation and Utilization of Space using a series of slides. (The Policy on Allocation and Utilization of
Space is on the web at http://www.uri.edu/facsen/URISPACE_POLICY.html)
She asked if there were any questions
about the space policy. There were none.
7. UNFINISHED
BUSINESS
Chairperson
Boudreaux-Bartels asked if there was any unfinished business. There was none.
8. NEW
BUSINESS
Chairperson
Boudreaux-Bartels asked if there was any new business.
Senator
Leo moved approval of the following resolution:
WHEREAS
The University of Rhode Island
states, in
its legally binding equal opportunity policy, that "The University of
Rhode
Island prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, sex, religion,
age,
color, creed, national origin, handicap, or sexual orientation, and
discrimination
against disabled and Vietnam Era veterans, in the recruitment,
admission,
or treatment of students . . . ", and
WHEREAS
There are questions and urgent
concerns when these unambiguous and legally binding policies are
violated and not enforced with respect to sexual orientation,
specifically the use of the office and services of Career Services on
the URI campus by military recruiters and interviewers operating under
the cover of the so-called "Don't ask, don't tell" policy affecting
gays in the military,
THEREFORE
We urge vehemently that the President
of the University reaffirm its current non-discrimination policy and
that he enforce its current prohibitions against discrimination to the
fullest possible legal extent with respect to military recruitment on
the campus.
Discussion ensued.
Following discussion, Vice
Chairperson Rosen
moved that consideration of the resolution be postponed definitely
until
the Faculty Senate meeting of March 24, 2005.
The motion to postpone definitely
carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 4:58 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Sheila Black Grubman
Academic Standards and Calendar Committee Report #04-05-2
PROPOSED SUMMER SESSION CALENDAR 2006
Summer
2005
2006
(Proposed)
SS I & II
On-Line Registration Opens for both Summer Session I and II
Feb 25
Feb 24
SS I
Cancellation Day
May 18
May 17
Wednesday before classes begin
SS I
Term I begins
May 23
May 22
SS I
Last day to ADD and to ADD Pass/Fail Option
May 27
May 26
SS I
Memorial Day Ð No classes
May 30
May 29
SS I
Make up Monday Classes - following Friday
Jun 3
Jun 2
SS I
Last day to Drop GRD and UGRD
Jun 3
Jun 2
SS I
Mid Semester
Jun 8
Jun 7
SS I
Term I Classes End and Exams Given
Week of
Week of
Jun 20
Jun 19
SS II
Cancellation Day
Jun 22
Jun 21
Wednesday before classes begin
SS II
Term II begins
Jun 27
Jun 26
SS I
Summer Session I Grade Reports Mailed/Available on the Web
Jul 1
Jun 30
SS II
Last day to ADD and to ADD Pass/Fail Option
Jul 1
Jun 30
SS II
4 th of July Ð No Classes
Jul 4
Jul 4
Monday
Tuesday
SS II
Make up classes due to holiday
Jul 8
Jul 7
Friday
Friday
SS II
Last day to Drop GRD and UGRD
Jul 8
Jul 7
SS II
Mid Semester
Jul 13
Jul 12
SS II
Term II Classes End and Exams Given
Week of
Week of
Jul 25
Jul 24
SS II
Summer Session II Grade Reports Mailed/Available on the Web
Aug 19
Aug 18
*8.85.30
Classification. When new programs are approved by the Faculty Senate,
approval may be classified as follows: approval Class A will mean that
the program is deemed to be of such merit as to justify the
recommendation of the immediate allocation of funds for its
implementation; approval Class B would recommend that
proposed new programs compete for resources on an equal basis with all
other University activities; approval Class C would recommend funding
of
the proposed new program should additional funds be made available to
the
University.