UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND
The Graduate School
Curricular Report from the Graduate Council to the Faculty Senate
Report No. 2004 – 2005 – 3A
At Meeting No.398 held on 19 November, 2004, the Graduate Council
approved the following proposal that is now submitted to the Faculty
Senate.
SECTION I
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
ABSTRACT
The Graduate Council approved a proposal from the College of Human
Science and Services for a graduate program leading to the Doctor of
Physical Therapy (DPT) degree. The proposed degree program would
replace the current M.S. program in Physical Therapy and would be a
professional, clinical degree. The new degree is said to reflect
the extraordinary growth in the required knowledge base for physical
therapy practitioners. The Graduate Council deemed the program to
be of significant merit, and it is forwarded to the Faculty Senate in
Class A.
BACKGROUND
The DPT will train new practitioners in physical therapy.
Graduates of the program will meet the national qualifying standards
for the licensing exam that is required nationally to practice as a
Physical Therapist. The clinical doctorate is said to better
prepare students for the increased scope and depth of requirements for
modern practice of physical therapy and will serve current
practitioners in the state and region who need to upgrade their
professional skills to the new standard. There is no similar
program
in the state of Rhode Island.
The proposal was reviewed under the process established by the Faculty
Senate in which the Graduate Council serves as the Coordinating and
Review Committee. Announcements of the receipt of the proposal
were sent to the Provost and the Council of Deans, the Budget Office,
and Department Chairs and Directors. Recommendations were sought
from each of these, and the comments received are appended.
Comments and recommendations have been kept on file in the Graduate
School.
Recognizing that the trend in allied health programs is to move to the
doctorate as the professional degree, the Council of Deans endorsed the
proposal. The Budget Office noted that the proposal plans for two
tenure track faculty positions - each at an estimated cost of
$85,440 per year (salary plus fringe benefits). However, the
proposal indicates that the program should
be able to provide an increase in revenues to cover these additional
costs.
SECTION II
RECOMMENDATION
The Graduate Council approved the proposal for the DPT degree at its
meeting
number 398 held on 19 November, 2004, and forwards it to the Faculty
Senate
in the Class A* category.
*8.85.30
Classification. When new programs are approved by the Faculty Senate,
approval may be classified as follows: approval Class A will mean that
the program is deemed to be of such merit as to justify the
recommendation of the immediate allocation of funds for its
implementation; approval Class B would recommend that proposed new
programs compete for resources on an equal basis with all other
University activities; approval Class C would recommend funding of the
proposed new program should additional funds be made available to the
University.
Proposal for a Doctor of Physical Therapy Degree
Program
A. Program Information:
1. Name of institution.
University of Rhode Island
2. Name of department, division, school
or college.
Department of Kinesiology
College of Human Science and Services
3. Title of program and federal
Classification
of Instructional Programs (CIP) code.
Doctor
of Physical Therapy (51.2308)
4. Intended initiation date of program
change
and anticipated date for granting first degrees or certificates.
| Initiation of program change |
September 2005
|
| Granting of first degree |
May, 2008
|
5. Intended location of program.
Independence Square, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI
6. Description of institutional review
and
approval process.
The proposal was reviewed under the process established
by the Faculty Senate in which the Graduate Council serves as the
Coordinating
and Review Committee. Announcements of the receipt of the proposal were
sent
to the President and Joint Educational Policy Committee, the Provost
and
the Council of Deans, the Budget Office and Department Chairs and
Directors.
|
DATE APPROVED
|
Department(s)/Committee(s)/Group(s)
|
10/12/04
|
College(s)
|
10/19/04
|
Graduate Council
|
11/19/04
|
| Faculty Senate |
|
President of the University
|
|
7. Summary description of the proposed
program.
The proposed degree program would replace the current
Master of Science degree in Physical Therapy in the Department of
Kinesiology,
which is in the College of Human Science and Services. The DPT would be
a
professional, clinical degree and not have a major focus on preparing
graduates
for careers in research. This is an important difference from the Ph.D.
A
similar degree in concept is the Au. D., the doctor of audiology, also
housed
in the College of Human Science and Services at URI. The new degree
reflects
the extraordinary growth in the required knowledge base for physical
therapy
practitioners in a field facing increasingly complex issues of
diagnosis
and management of movement disorders. The current program in physical
therapy
is the only one in the State of Rhode Island (CCRI has an associates
degree
level Physical Therapist Assistant program) and one of 16 in New
England.
8. Signature of President
______________________________________________
Robert L. Carothers, President
9. Resources will be required.
The program will replace the existing Master of Science
in Physical Therapy degree program and will use existing facilities and
staff.
Two faculty positions are requested; one to replace a faculty member
who
left the University and was not replaced, and the other to fill a
position
that was previously searched for but not filled. See http://www.uri.edu/facsen/3A_Proposed_Budget.pdf
10. Name of Person(s) to contact during the review:
Peter Blanpied, PhD, PT
Interim Director, Physical Therapy
Chair Department of Kinesiology
(401)874-4065
blanpied@uri.edu
11. Signed agreements for any cooperative
arrangements made with other institutions/agencies in support of the
program.
There are no cooperative agreements with other agencies
or institutions.
B. Rationale:
1. State the program objectives
The DPT will train new practitioners in physical
therapy.
This professional doctorate will replace the existing Master of Science
in
Physical Therapy. Graduates of the program will meet the national
standards
for qualifying for the licensing exam, required nationally to practice
as
a Physical Therapist. These standards are established by the Commission
on
Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education (CAPTE), affiliated with
the
American Physical Therapy Association. The clinical doctorate will
better
prepare students for the increased scope and depth of requirements for
modern
practice of physical therapy. The program also will serve current
practitioners
in the state and region who need to upgrade their professional skills
to
the new standard.
2. Explain the needs addressed by this
program,
and present evidence that the program fulfills these needs.
A professional doctorate is the educational model
employed
by many of the health professions, including medicine (M.D.),
osteopathy
(D.O.), podiatry (D.P.M.), dentistry (D.D.S., or D.M.D.), pharmacy
(Pharm.D.),
and audiology (Au.D.), and in other Universities, physical therapy
(D.P.T.)
As of August 2004, 104 of the 204 PT education programs
in the country have implemented the DPT as the degree appropriate to
enter
practice. Another 89 programs have the stated intention of converting
to
the DPT within the next five years, and there are five developing
programs
at the DPT level. Should all of these programs convert as intended,
94.3%
of the current accredited and developing programs would be accredited
at
the DPT level within the next five to ten years.
The DPT is the appropriate degree because of the explosion in
scientific knowledge
and the refinement and increased complexity and sophistication of
diagnostic
and treatment procedures. CAPTE agrees, stating in the latest version
of
the accreditation standards on which URI’s Physical Therapy Program
will
be evaluated state (Final Draft Oct 2004, CC-7): “Based on the amount
and
complexity of that course work, the Doctor of Physical Therapy is the
preferred
degree.”
The model that was developed for the DPT is an expansion
and refinement of the curriculum for the current Master’s degree. An
extensive
and exhaustive review of the current program was performed by the
faculty
resulting in identification of areas of redundancy, areas in need of
expansion,
and new areas needed to be delivered. The resulting curricular content
aligns
well with accreditation standards (included in Appendix A See http://www.uri.edu/facsen/3A_Appendices.pdf)
indicates the proposed model will be very successful in preparing
future Physical
Therapists.
3. If an external advisory or steering
committee was used to develop the program, identify committee members
and their affiliations, and describe the committee's role.
No external advisory
committee was used.
C. Institutional Role: The program should be clearly
related
to the role and mission of the institution, and be compatible with
other
programs and activities of the institution.
1. Explain how the program is consistent
with the role and mission of the institution and how it is related to
the
institution's academic plan.
The Doctor of Physical Therapy fits well with the role
and mission of the institution, just as the existing Master of Science
in
Physical Therapy does. Physical Therapists practice in a variety of
settings,
including hospitals, private practices, schools, home care, the
military,
geriatric care centers, and industry. The program fits well within the
focus
programs of Health, and of Children, Families, and Communities. Faculty
members
in the existing program share interests and interactions in the areas
of
Exercise Science, Human Development, Gerontology, Biology, and
Biomedical
Engineering. The existing program provides newly trained practitioners
to
the state, region, and nation, as well as providing opportunity for
continued
education to established professionals. The new program will continue
these
activities, but with greater authority. Since there will be an
increasing
number of practicing Physical Therapists in the area who hold a
doctorate,
these clinicians will logically seek continuing education opportunities
from
a doctoral level program.
The current program in Physical Therapy is the only
training
program in Rhode Island and one of only 16 in New England. Four of the
16
programs in New England are in public institutions, the remaining 12
are
in private colleges and universities. Half of the New England programs
are
already at the DPT level, ALL of the others are in the process of
proposing
the DPT to their various governing bodies.
2. Explain the relationship of the
program
to other programs offered by the institution.
The program will relate to other programs at URI in much
the same manner as the current Physical Therapy Master’s degree program
does.
The strongest relationship is with both the undergraduate and graduate
programs in Exercise Science. Many of the undergraduate students in
Exercise Science have targeted physical therapy for graduate study and
as their future profession. We anticipate further collaboration and
will work to facilitate this undergraduate preparation as a route to
successful admittance into the DPT program. Graduate students in
Exercise Science and Physical Therapy provide laboratory assistance in
learning experiences in each other’s clinical and research labs, and
have occasionally taken classes in each other’s discipline. As two
programs existing within the Department of Kinesiology, we will seek
further curricular collaboration in relevant areas (e.g., research
methods, muscular and cardiovascular physiology).
Currently, the Physical Therapy Clinic shares
administrative
support (third-party billing) with the Speech and Hearing Clinic.
Members
of the Physical Therapy Clinic also supports URI’s Student Health
Services
by participating in a weekly clinic.
Faculty in the program will continue their relationships with other
programs and divisions throughout the University. For example, Dr.
Roush is currently serving as half time Associate Dean in the College
of Human Science and Services, and Dr. Blanpied is serving as Chair of
the Department of Kinesiology. Additionally, the Physical Therapy
Program has close ties with the Rhode Island Geriatric Education
Center, the RI Developmental Disabilities Council, RI and national
Special Olympics, and the URI Office of Disability Services.
D. Interinstitutional Considerations:
1. List similar programs offered in the
state and region, and compare the objectives of similar programs.
There are no similar programs (graduate program in
physical
therapy) in Rhode Island. There is an Associates Degree for training
Physical
Therapist Assistants at CCRI. In New England there are 16 accredited PT
education
programs. Eight of the 16 are already at the DPT level ALL of the
others
are currently in the process of proposing the DPT to their various
governing
bodies. The programs in New England are:
Connecticut:
University of Connecticut (Storrs) (MS moving to DPT)
University of Hartford (DPT)
Quinnipiac (MSPT moving to DPT)
Sacred Heart (DPT)
Massachusetts
American International College (MS moving to DPT)
Boston University (DPT)
MGH Institute of Health Professions (DPT)
Northeastern University (MS moving to DPT)
Simmons College (DPT)
Springfield College (MS moving to DPT)
University of Mass Lowell (DPT)
Maine:
University of New England (DPT)
Husson College (MS moving to DPT)
New Hampshire:
Franklin Pierce College (MS moving to DPT)
Rhode Island:
University of Rhode Island (MS moving to DPT)
Vermont:
University of Vermont (moving to DPT)
All of the above programs train entry-level physical
therapists. While program strengths and emphases might differ slightly,
all
are required to meet rigorous national accreditation standards ensuring
similar
and appropriate scope and depth of content covered. A comparison of the
proposed
DPT at URI to all other New England PT programs is presented in
Appendix
B. See http://www.uri.edu/facsen/3A_Appendices.pdf.
2. Estimate the projected impact
of
the program on the other higher education institutions in Rhode Island.
Because there is no other graduate PT Program in Rhode Island there
will be no impact.
3. Describe any provisions for transfer students
(into or out of the program) at other Rhode Island public institutions
of higher education. Describe any transfer agreements with independent
institutions.
Because there is no other graduate program in Physical Therapy in Rhode
Island, there will be no need for transfer provisions.
4. Describe any cooperative arrangements with
institutions offering similar programs. (Signed copies of any
agreements pertaining to use of faculty, library, equipment, and
facilities should be attached.)
There are no cooperative arrangements with other institutions offering
similar programs.
5. If external affiliations are required, identify
providing agencies. (Indicate the status of any arrangements made and
append letters of agreement, if appropriate.)
A portion of the DPT program necessarily involves clinical training, as
does the current MS program. To accomplish this training, we have and
will
continue to use a wide variety of clinical sites and experiences. A
list
of sites with which we have a current affiliation for clinical training
is
presented in Appendix C. See http://www.uri.edu/facsen/3A_Appendices.pdf.
6. Indicate whether the program will be
available to students under the New England Board of Higher Education
(NEBHE) Regional Student Program (RSP).
As indicated in D.1., there is currently at least one PT program in
each of the states of New England, so this program will not be
available to students under the NEBHE Regional Student Program.
E. Program:
1. Prepare a typical
curriculum display for one program cycle for each sub-major, specialty
or
option, including the following information:
In formulating the curriculum for the DPT, the current Master’s program
curriculum underwent an intensive analysis and revision, the first such
major
and comprehensive analysis in 10 years. Instead of describing only the
new
courses here, the entire curriculum is presented so the reader may have
a
better understanding of the integration, flow, and progressive nature
of
the DPT curriculum as a whole. (See http://www.uri.edu/facsen/3A_curric_display.pdf
For a description of the necessary changes from what is required in the
current Master’s program, the reader is referred to Appendix D. See http://www.uri.edu/facsen/3A_Appendices.pdf
a. Required courses
in area of specialization and options, if any.
All courses listed in E.1.a. are required. The curricular changes
needed
to implement the program are listed in Appendix D. See http://www.uri.edu/facsen/3A_Appendices.pdf
Required forms and course syllabi also are included in Appendix D. See http://www.uri.edu/facsen/3A_Appendices.pdf
b. Total number of credits
required for the completion of the program or for graduation. Present
evidence that the program is of appropriate length as illustrated by
conformity with appropriate accrediting agency standards, applicable
industry standards, or other credible measure, and comparability of
lengths with similar programs in the state or
region.
This program requires 109 credits for the post baccalaureate DPT. The
national
average for DPT programs is 115 credits (range 90 – 147 credits,
2003-2004
data). The 2006 CAPTE accreditation standards (under which the URI DPT
Program
will be judged) reads
“In order to adequately address the content
and learning experiences necessary for students to achieve the
expectations
listed above, the professional curriculum is at least three academic
years
(or the equivalent) in length. Preferably, the series of courses
included
in the professional curriculum is awarded at least 90 semester credit
hours
(or the equivalent) and the clinical education component of the
curriculum
includes a minimum of 30 weeks of full-time clinical education
experiences.”
The proposed program meets all three standards of length of program,
semester credit hours, and length of clinical experiences.
c. Identify any courses
that
will be delivered or received by way of distance learning.
PHT 655 Diagnostic Imaging is being designed as a web
based course. In addition, It is anticipated that elements of PHT 640
Evidence
Based Inquiry IV will be delivered through a distance learning model.
This
is necessary as the students will be off campus performing their
full-time
clinical affiliations during that semester. They will return at the end
of
the semester to complete PHT 640.
2. Describe certification/licensing
requirements, if any, for program graduates and the degree to which
completion of the required course work meets said requirements.
Indicate the agencies and timetables for graduates to meet those
requirements.
Graduates are required to take a national exam; a specific
pass level is required by the state to obtain a license to practice
physical
therapy in Rhode Island. They must graduate from a CAPTE accredited
physical
therapist educational program to qualify to sit for the exam.
CAPTE is kept up-to-date on this program proposal, and immediately upon
passing through the institutional and Board of Governors of Higher
Education
processes, CAPTE will review the documents related to the ‘Application
of
Substantive Change’ and render a decision on the accreditation
standards.
It is our intention that the following timeline be used to ensure
passage
of the DPT Program and maintenance.
F. Faculty and Staff: The faculty and support staff
for
the program should be sufficient in number and demonstrate the
knowledge, skills, and other attributes necessary to the success of the
program.
1. List present and
proposed
faculty who will be assigned to the program. The following information
should
be provided, where possible, for each:
See http://www.uri.edu/facsen/3A_faculty_staff.pdf
for the current and proposed faculty needed to deliver the DPT Program.
The national average of faculty FTE in DPT programs is approximately
10.7 full time and 1.6 part-time (data from 2003-2004 A/Y). Our DPT
program proposal is for six full-time and two part-time; well below the
national average, but
substantially improved from the current status of four full-time and
two
part-time in the Master’s program. Currently a significant portion of
the
curriculum is delivered by per-course-lecturers and grant funded
personnel.
Even though our proposal will result in fewer FTE than
national averages, our program is also smaller in student numbers than
the
national norm (24 students vs. 41). Teaching loads in the URI PT
Program
((9 credits + 2 office hours) * 32 weeks = 352 contact hours per A/Y)
are
also higher than national norms (218.4 contact hours per
A/Y).
As seen below, the DPT proposal adds two new faculty
lines.
The Program Budget shows that new revenue generated by the credit
overload
fees of the DPT program more than pays for this increase. The teaching
loads
of the new faculty are shown below; our reliance on per-course
lecturers
and grant funded personnel will decrease substantially.
2. Summarize the annual costs for faculty and support staff by
indicating salaries and fringe benefits (adjusted for the proportion of
time devoted to the program). For the first year, distinguish between
existing resources and new resources. Specify if resources are to be
provided by more than one department. (Include information in proposed
budget.)
Please see the Expenses portion of the Proposal Budget. Two faculty
positions are added to the current level; one of these lines replaces a
position lost after a faculty member left the Program (Dupre position
not replaced), the other replaces a line searched for in the mid 1990’s
but not filled. The search
was not continued. Additionally, operating expenses are restored to the
level
received in 2002.
The Budget Summary shows a net revenue gain every year; the gain
increases as subsequent DPT classes are enrolled to level out with a
positive revenue of $597,992 per year.
G. Students: The program should be designed to
provide students with a course of study that will contribute to their
intellectual, social and economic well-being. Students selected should
have the necessary potential and commitment to complete the program
successfully.
1. Describe the potential students for
the
program and the primary source of these students. Indicate the extent
to
which the program will attract new students or will draw students from
existing
programs. For graduate programs, indicate which undergraduate programs
would
be a potential source of students.
Because the DPT program will replace the current Master’s
degree program, many of the sources for prospective students will be
the
same. Typically half the class is from Rhode Island, and approximately
one
third are URI graduates. Only rarely do students leave other programs
at
URI, or other institutions, and enroll in our program, so implementing
the
DPT will not draw students from other programs at URI. Typically,
graduates
from URI’s programs in Exercise Science, Biology, and Psychology have
been
a major source of graduate students in Physical Therapy, and we expect
this
trend to continue with the DPT.
2. Estimate the proposed program size and provide
projected annual full-time, part-time, and FTE enrollments for one
complete cycle of the program.
The size of the proposed DPT program is the same as the current
Master’s degree
program. 24 students in a class, three years of study determines that
approximately
72 students will be in the DPT program. We encourage and anticipate
that
all students will be full time.
3. List the program
admission and retention requirements for students. Provide descriptions
of the specific criteria and methods used to assess students' ability
to benefit from the program. Describe how satisfactory academic
progress will be determined.
Admission to the DPT will be identical to the current Master’s program,
and will be on a competitive basis. Requirements will include a
bachelor’s
degree, taking the GRE national standardized test, two letters of
recommendation (one must be from a Physical Therapist), at least 30
hours of physical therapy observational experience, a standard Graduate
School Application, and evidence (by official transcript) that the
applicant has passed the following coursework:
Biology (12 credits including 8 credits in Human Anatomy
and Human Physiology)
Chemistry (8 credits of lab courses; Intro and second level – usually
Organic
Physics (8 credits of lab courses; Intro and second level)
Psychology (6 credits; Intro and second level)
Communications (3 credits – speaking or writing)
Math (3 credits through Pre-Calculus)
Statistics (3 credits)
Student performance and progress will be reviewed at the
end
of every semester. Students will be evaluated in three domains: the
cognitive
domain, by individual and collective course grades (all required
courses
must be passed at a level of 2.0 or above, a cumulative QPA of 3.0 will
be
required for retention); the psychomotor domain, by performance in the
skill
competency exams of clinical courses and by performance in
affiliations;
and the affective domain, by adhering to the Generic Abilities of
Physical
Therapists, a tool refined and currently used throughout the curriculum
in
the Master’s degree program.
Student’s ability to benefit from the program will be
assessed
by passing rates on the national licensing examination, and by
employment
figures. The Master’s program currently has a passing rate higher than
the
national average, and employment rate 6 months after graduation that
exceeds
92%. It is anticipated that these numbers, while quite high, will only
improve
with the implementation of the DPT.
4. Indicate available funds for scholarships and
fellowships.
The same scholarship sources currently available in our Master’s degree
program will be available to the DPT students. These include graduate
assistantships, and a significant number (currently 13) of grant
related student support positions.
H. Administration: Administrative oversight for the
program should be sufficient without endangering the existing programs.
1. Indicate how the program will be
administered, and the degree to which this work will affect the
administrative structure in which it is located.
The DPT Program will administratively reside in the
Department
of Kinesiology in the College of Human Science and Services. Because
the
DPT will be a replacement for the current Master’s degree program in
physical
therapy, there will be no impact on the administrative structure of the
Department
or College.
2. Indicate the names and titles of the persons who
will
have administrative responsibility for the program, and the percent of
time
each will spend on the program.
Professor Beth Marcoux is the current Director of the Master’s degree
program,
and she will continue as Director of the DPT Program. Peter
Blanpied,
Associate Professor, is serving as Interim Director. Dr. Robin
Katzanek,
Clinical Assistant Professor, is the Academic Coordinator of Clinical
Education,
and administers the in-house and external clinical internships. Mr.
John
McLinden, Clinical Assistant Professor, is the Clinic Coordinator of
University
Physical Therapy, and coordinates the clinical operations.
3. Indicate additional annual administrative salaries
and
related costs to be associated with the program. (Include information
in
proposed budget.)
Administrative costs associated with the DPT will be the same as for
the current Master’s degree program in Physical Therapy.
I. Instructional Resources: The instructional
resources should be sufficient in quantity, quality and timeliness to
support a successful program.
1. Estimate the number of relevant
print,
electronic and other non-print library materials needed, and those
available,
for the program and compare with recommendations of national
accrediting
agencies, the standards of the Association of College and Research
Libraries,
and/or any other recognized measures of general library adequacy in
terms
of collections, staff, space and operations.
The holdings and subscriptions (including online
subscriptions)
of the library currently support the Master’s degree in Physical
Therapy.
It is not expected that significant additional new resources that
exceed
the requests of the current program will be needed. Students in the
program
have additional online resources available from the American Physical
Therapy Association, our professional organization. The current
resources have met the standards of accreditation of CAPTE, and this
issue will be reviewed during
the reaccrediting process in September 2005.
The Library Impact Statement for the new courses and the DPT Program
appears in Appendix E. See http://www.uri.edu/facsen/3A_Appendices.pdf
2. Identify and evaluate other instructional
resources and
instructional support equipment (such as computers, laboratory
equipment and
supplies, etc.) in terms of overall capability to satisfy the needs of
the
program. If these instructional resources are considered insufficient
or
if upgrading is necessary for the development of the program, the
additional needs should be detailed.
Other instructional resources and support will be similar to those
existing in the Master’s degree program in Physical Therapy. Located in
the Independence Square building, the facilities include a computer
laboratory (shared with Communicative Disorders), classrooms with
computers and projectors, and well equipped clinic and research areas.
Capital equipment necessary to support the instructional, clinical, and
scholarship efforts of the Master’s program should be similar to that
needed for the DPT; these have been funded though a variety of sources
including ledger 3 clinic income, grant funds, and funds from the URI
Foundation.
3. Estimate annual expenditures
for instructional resources. The information should reflect the annual
operation and maintenance of the instructional resources, recurrent
costs and costs for necessary additions. See proposed budget at http://www.uri.edu/facsen/3A_Proposed_Budget.pdf
J. Facilities and Capital Equipment: Facilities and
capital equipment should be sufficient in quantity, quality and
timeliness to support a successful program.
1. Describe the facilities and
capital equipment (e.g., classrooms, office space, laboratories,
telecommunications equipment, etc.) and assess the adequacy of these
resources relative to the program, and to the requirement of the
Americans with Disabilities Act.
The facilities and capital equipment needed to deliver the DPT program
are similar to those needed for the current Master’s degree program in
Physical Therapy in the Independence Square building in Kingston. The
proposed new courses are classroom based and require no additional
capital equipment. The
Independence Square building is in full compliance with the Americans
with
Disabilities Act.
2. If new or renovated facilities
are necessary, explain in detail (e.g., requirements, costs, sources of
revenue, and expected date of completion). (See http://www.uri.edu/facsen/3A_Proposed_Budget.pdf)
No new or renovated facilities
are required.
K. Financial Considerations: Projected revenues
should be sufficient to support a successful program, and must cover
the estimated costs of the program.
1. Expenditures for program
initiation and annual operation should be estimated and displayed in
the proposed budget. The summary should enable the reader to understand
expenditures for a period representative of one full program cycle
As shown in the budget, annual operating expenses are aligned with
current levels, but reduced from past years. Personnel expenses are
increased over current levels, primarily caused by filling the Director
Position (Marcoux started 12/04), and the replacement of two positions
recently lost by retirement (Romeo), or leaving the University (Dupre).
The budget details how increased revenue will more than cover these
costs.
2. Revenue estimates should be
provided for a similar period of time. For a new program, the
appropriateness and feasibility
of instituting differential tuition and/or fees should be addressed.
The DPT Proposal budget is shown in detail See http://www.uri.edu/facsen//3A_Proposed_Budget.pdf,
and is based on the following assumptions:
- 109 credits (increased from 82 in the current Master’s program)
- three-year full-time program (same as current Master’s program)
- 24 incoming students per year (same as current Master’s
program)
- one half of the students are Rhode Island residents
(approximately
the same as current Master’s program)
- tuition costs increase by 9% in FY ‘07, 8.8% in FY ’08 and 8.5%
in
FY ‘09; these estimates came from the URI Budget Office
- Salary increases by 3.5% yearly – this includes faculty, staff,
graduate assistants, per course lecturers and lecture honoraria. These
figures came from the URI Budget Office.
- Fringe rate figures came from the URI Budget Office.
- Both new faculty members are tenure-track and are hired for the
start
of AY ’05. This is a conservative assumption.
- The Masters Program in Physical Therapy does not have a
significant
problem with attrition of students, averaging approximately one
students
per year over the last 3 years. This rate is offset somewhat by the
approximately one student per year who chooses a somewhat slower pace,
finishing in four years. The attrition rate for the DPT Program is
expected to be approximately the same as that for the Masters Program.
3. Describe how current
institutional resources will be redeployed or extra institutional
resources will be obtained to support the program.
Admission of students into the current Master’s degree program in
Physical Therapy will be terminated upon approval of the DPT.
Institutional resources that support the Master’s degree will be
deployed to manage the DPT.
L. Evaluation: Appropriate criteria for evaluating
the success of a program should be developed and used.
1. List the criteria by which the
institution plans to evaluate the program during the first program
cycle. Describe provisions made for external evaluation, as appropriate.
Program review for the first cycle and continuing cycles will be
performed internally by the Program, the Department of Kinesiology, and
by the office of the Dean, College of Human Science and Services. Data
that will be examined include:
o Number of applicants
o QPA, prerequisite QPA, and GRE scores of applicants offered admittance
o Student retention and outcome
o Number graduated (CAPTE requirement CO-4)
o Graduate QPA
o Pass rate on license exam (CAPTE requirement CO-3: must be >80%
when
averaged over 3 years)
o Employment rates (CAPTE requirement CO-4)
o Meet the health care needs of patients/clients and
society
through ethical behavior, continued competence and advocacy for the
profession
(CAPTE requirement CO-2)
o Number of alumni contacted
o Alumni support (financial and participation)
External evaluation occurs as described below.
2. If the proposed program is
eligible for specialized accreditation, indicate name and address of
the accrediting agency and a list of accreditation requirements.
In order to qualify to sit for the national licensing exam, potential
Physical Therapists must have graduated from an accredited Physical
Therapist education program. The external body that reviews and
provides accreditation status is the Commission on Accreditation in
Physical Therapy Education (CAPTE), and the CAPTE accreditation process
is extremely comprehensive and rigorous. Appendix A contains a copy of
the Evaluative Criteria for the Accreditation of Education Programs for
the Preparation of Physical Therapists (adopted 10/26/04, effective
1/1/06). In summary, the criteria are organized in the following way:
Institution and Program Integrity and Capacity
Institutional Integrity and Capacity
Program Mission, Goals, and Expected Outcomes
Program Assessment and Planning
Policies and Procedures
Program Faculty
Program Resources
Curriculum Plan, Evaluation, Content, and Outcomes
Curriculum Plan
Curricular Evaluation
Curriculum Content
Curriculum Outcomes
The current Master’s program in Physical Therapy is accredited through
2006, with the re-accreditation site visit scheduled to occur in
September
2005. A re-accreditation decision will be rendered at the Spring 2006
CAPTE
meeting.