URI geophysicist: Oceanic crust formation is dynamic after all
Todd McLeish, 401-874-7892
Discovery reported in journal Nature
KINGSTON, R.I. – November 25, 2009 -- Imagine the Earth’s crust as the planet’s skin: Some areas are old and wrinkled while others have a fresher, more youthful sheen, as if they had been regularly lathered with lotion.
Carry the metaphor a little further and a good picture emerges of the geological processes leading to the creation of the planet’s crust. On land, continental crust, once created, can remain more or less unaltered for billions of years. But the oldest oceanic crust is only about 200 million years old, as new crust is continually forming at mid-ocean ridge spreading centers.
While geologists have known that oceanic crust continually replenishes itself, they have been unsure what occurs below the surface that leads to the resurfacing. What dynamics are occurring in the mantle that eventually produces new crust, that new layer of skin on the ocean’s bottom?
The answer has been elusive in part because oceanic crust is difficult to reach and instruments that can measure seismic activity have not fully covered the terrain to obtain an accurate picture of forces below the surface. Now earth scientists at the University of Rhode Island and Brown University have observed — in detail and at unprecedented depths — a geological phenomenon known as dynamic upwelling in the underlying mantle beneath a spreading center.
Their findings, reported in this week’s Nature, may resolve a longstanding debate regarding the relative importance of passive and dynamic upwelling in the shallow mantle beneath spreading centers on the seafloor.
Brian Savage, URI assistant professor of geophysics, said the finding is important because it helps to provide “a basic understanding of how a majority of the Earth’s crust is formed, how it emerges from the mantle below to create the oceanic crust. It's a basic science question that helps understand how crust is created.”
“We know the crust of the ocean is produced by upwelling beneath separating plates,” added Don Forsyth, professor of geological sciences at Brown. “We just didn’t know the upwelling pattern that took place, that there are concentrated upwelling centers rather than uniform upwelling.”
Mantle upwelling and melting beneath spreading centers has been thought to be mostly a passive response to the separating oceanic plates above. The new finding shows there appears to be a dynamic component as well, driven by the buoyancy of melt retained in the rock or by the lighter chemical composition of rock from which melt has been removed.
The scientists from URI and Brown based their findings on a high-resolution seismic study in the Gulf of California. In that region, there are 25 seismometers spaced along the western coast of Mexico and the Baja California peninsula, which lie on either side of the Gulf of California. Yun Wang, a Brown graduate student and the paper’s lead author, tracked the velocity of seismic waves that traveled from one station to another. She noticed a pattern: The seismic waves in three localized centers, spaced about 155 miles apart, traveled more slowly than waves in the surrounding mantle, implying the presence of more melt in the localized centers and thus a more vigorous upwelling. From that, the geologists determined the centers, located 25 to 55 miles below the surface, showed evidence of dynamic upwelling in the mantle.
While other studies have been done of mantle geodynamics, most notably an experiment on the East Pacific Rise, the URI-Brown study imaged seismic activity, or the shear velocity of the seismic waves, some 125 miles below the surface — a far deeper seismic penetration into the mantle than previous experiments.