Comparison of State Financing of Telecommunications and Networking Projects

The states that are deploying or upgrading telecommunications and computing networks have passed legislation supporting the investment in such networks. "The sources of educational telecommunications funding can be divided into about five general categories: foundations, technology companies, federal grants, state grants, and school district or college general revenue funds" (Hezel, 1994). States such as Georgia and Michigan have even earmarked massive windfalls of recaptured funds from telecommunications providers who overcharged consumers.

Information was collected on those states that appear to be the front runners in telecommunications developments. Table 7 provides a simple summary of the state funding initiatives. The bullet items list additional information on investments that states are making in information technology.

Table 7: Matrix of State Financing of Telecommunications and Networking Projects


Many other states have recognized that telecommunications and computer networks are one of the most important elements to education in the 1990's. Rhode Island has not made any special investments in initiatives to improve telecommunications and computer networks in education. Funding and work that is going into the support of RINet and Ocean State Free Net (OSFN) is largely due to gratis and in-kind efforts, as well as grant funding from organizations other than state government. Technology funding at URI, RIC and CCRI, is primarily from general institutional funds, grants secured by faculty members, and student technology fees. As the number of states making significant investments in technology and statewide networks grows, Rhode Island will continue to fall further behind and will have even greater difficulty catching up. Our public colleges and universities may not be able to attract and retain first-rate faculty who have not only come to expect high quality computing and communications facilities, but require such facilities in order to function as teachers and researchers. Further, it would not be unreasonable to expect that neglecting to invest in new technology will have an adverse and compounding effect on enrollments. It is becoming clear that many high school graduates (prospective college students) and their parents expect universities and colleges to have a technology base that offers high-powered workstations/microcomputers that are widely accessible throughout campuses and from dormitory rooms. Additionally, remote access (typically from home) via high-speed communications links and modems to institution networks and global networks is becoming an ingredient essential to the higher education experience.

Proceed to next section

Return to Table of Contents