THE UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND
GRADUATE SCHOOL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION STUDIES
LSC 531: READING INTERESTS OF YOUNG ADULTS
FALL 2003: Worcester & WebCT
draft, 8/14/03

Dr. Gale Eaton          (401) 874-4651

Office hours: by appointment

GSLIS, Rodman Hall
94 West Alumni Ave.
University of Rhode Island
Kingston, RI  02881-0815

e-mail: geaton@uri.edu or geaton@uriacc.uri.edu or eea9226u@uri.edu – all the same account! Better yet, use WebCT mail so course matters will be safe in one place. 

COURSE DESCRIPTION: Building, maintaining, evaluating, and promoting collections to serve the special interests and information needs of adolescents in public and secondary school libraries. Books rule, but comics, magazines, Internet sites, MTV, etc. may also be considered in class discussion and in individual assignments.

This section of LSC 531 is offered via WebCT. Although it is asynchronous, weekly participation is required. You will need adequate Internet access, and you will have to budget at least as much time for this as for a face-to-face course. I will worry if you don’t post. If you have trouble with the course, I want to hear from you as soon as possible – you can e-mail me (geaton@uri.edu) or call (401-874-4651) and leave a message. The last date to drop courses this semester is October 27; the last date to drop with a billing adjustment is September 16. 

OBJECTIVES: By the end of the course, students will be able to:

1.      Assess the informational and recreational reading needs of young adult users of public, middle school and high school libraries, taking into account developmental tasks as well as educational requirements (GSLIS Educational Outcomes 10, 11; RIDE 3.1);

2.      Develop and implement a policy for managing the young adult collection, including print, non-print and online resources, and balancing literary, practical, and ethical considerations (GSLIS 2, 3, 4: RIDE 2.3);

3.      Locate, use, and evaluate current and retrospective selection aids to support the collection development process (GSLIS 4; RIDE 2.3);

4.      Identify and evaluate resources to meet specific needs of individual users (GSLIS 4, 11; RIDE 2.3); and

5.      Promote useful and appealing resources through booktalking, annotated lists, exhibits, Internet pages, in the context of school library media or public library services (GSLIS 1, 8; RIDE 1.2, 2.4, 3.2, 4.2).

COURSE REQUIREMENTS AND GRADING:

Reading: The textbook for this course is Literature for Today’s Young Adults, by Alleen Pace Nilsen and Kenneth L. Donelson, 6th ed. (New York: Addison-Wesley Longman, 2001). Required to support class discussion are Catcher in the Rye, by J.D. Salinger, and Witness, by Karen Hesse. To support your selections for additional reading, rely on the textbook and on standard library selection tools (for instance, School Library Journal; H.W. Wilson’s Junior High and Senior High School Catalog; or annual lists from the Young Adult Library Services Association, Best Books for Young Adults and Quick Picks). For more details see the class reading list.

Basis for grades:

1.      Reader Response Essay (15%)

2.      Online Presentation on YA Information Needs  (25%)

3.      Term project or paper (25%)

4.      Materials log (20%)

5.      Participation (15%)

Interpretation of grades: A grade of B on an assignment in this course will mean that you have met the basic requirements for the assignment; your performance would be acceptable on a professional level. A grade of A will mean that your performance is not only acceptable, but distinguished. A grade of C for graduate students indicates failure to perform at an acceptable level for graduate credit.

General requirements: All my picky requirements about file names and sizes, suggestions about writing essays, etc., are posted separately.  Please refer to them as needed. The single thing that helps the most is something that can’t be required, exactly: if you take ownership of an assignment and think about how to communicate your own vision most effectively, it’s likely to be more distinguished than anything you’d achieve by just asking me what I really want.

”I am not too concerned about whether the reader knows the theme of the story, or a generalization about the story. I am more interested in the reader being in the story. I leave room for readers there inside, if they want to partake. I want to have them live with the landscape, the time of the book, and the characters of the book’s world. I am not really sure if the reader will understand all of it. I care deeply that the story move him, the reader, change her, the reader, and overwhelm readers with a new sense of knowing.” – Hamilton, Virginia. “Everything of Value: Moral Realism in Literature for Children.” JOYS 6, 4 (1993): 363-377.

READER RESPONSE ESSAY (due September 27). According to reader response theory, meaning is not an invariant thing, coded in a text for clever readers to guess and the rest of us to feel stupid about. Real meaning is created by a responsible reader in collaboration with the text, and not only do different readers find different things in a text, but the same reader may see different meanings at different times. While you’re thinking about how YA reading interests are affected by their own development and the world around them, write either a Memory Essay or Alternative Essay. The first objective of this assignment is to revive your memory of what reading was like when you were an adolescent; the second is to encourage you to integrate that memory with what you know from the outside about teen readers. How well does your subjective knowledge match what the experts say?

Memory essay: Find a book you remember from your YA years. It could be fiction or nonfiction, a book you had to read for school, or a book you were forbidden to read. It could be the latest in a series all your friends were reading, too. It could be something you read in desperation – the only unread book left in the summer house, left there decades ago by an adolescent uncle. It could even be a comic book or a magazine (those are hard to find again – you might end up comparing the Mad Magazine you remember to a newer, racier version). Trouble remembering? Check out http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/jad22/index.html#Categories – a “First Lines: A Sort of Literacy Test” – and see if the playing the game reminds you of what you’ve read. 

Before rereading your book, write down what you can remember. What did you like or dislike about the book? What do you remember most – an incident, an image, a phrase, a mood? How did you feel about the book back then? Why do you think you felt that way? Was the context of your reading important?

As you reread the book, keep notes. What do you like or dislike about the book now? Have your perceptions of it changed? Do you see meanings you didn’t see before? Do the author’s techniques or mannerisms impress you differently? How have you changed as a reader? Jot things down as you think of them.

Write a 3- to 6-page essay comparing your two readings of the book. Include an introduction; enough information about the book to make the essay meaningful; a description of your first reading; a description of your second reading; a comparison of the two; and a conclusion.

Alternative: First, review what you know about literary criticism (chapter 2 of your textbook may be helpful) and about YA development. Then, read a controversial YA novel. (If you can’t think of one, check a list of contested books, like the YA Hit List.) As you read the book, keep notes. What meanings do you see in it? Given what you know about teenagers, at first hand or through your theoretical reading, what meanings would you expect them to see in it? You may read criticism and reviews (both by the book’s would-be censors and its defenders) if you feel this will be useful to you; remember to cite what you read. Write a 4- to 6-page essay discussing the book’s literary quality and the sort of meaning you would expect an attentive teenaged reader to construct from it. Support your opinions.

These essays are difficult to grade—especially the memory essays, because they are about private truths. But although you start from subjective realities that only you know, the object is to express that private knowledge in ways that show its relevance to more general experience. Criteria for grading will include:

·         Demonstrates sensitivity to the text, and awareness of how the text helps guide readers’ reactions (25%)

·         Demonstrates understanding of adolescent development, and of how readers’ own knowledge and perceptions help to create meaning (25%)

·         Coherent; could easily be understood by a stranger who is not familiar with the book, because all necessary information is given (20%)

·         Logical; internally consistent in comparison and conclusions (15%)

·         Organized clearly, well-written, correct grammar & spelling (10%)

·         Neat; double-spaced, good margins, legible type, etc. (5%)

Online Presentation on YA Information Needs (due one Saturday in October; sign up for your date at first class meeting): An on-line presentation to the class, demonstrating how library services and resources can be marketed to a carefully identified group of constituents. You may choose to do an individual or a group presentation (see below for group suggestions). You may mount your presentation on your own website, giving your instructor the URL so a link can be created from the class homepage; or, if your format is compatible, you can send your presentation as a WebCT attachment to the instructor for uploading. No attachment over 500K (which is already too big for comfort) will be accepted (see general requirements). This assignment should be useful to your classmates, so avoid nifty creations that demand new plug-ins and have long download times – low-tech presentations are usually easier to view. 

The object of the assignment is to apply a marketing approach to outreach: 

1.      Identify a group of library constituents – kids, teachers, or any other realistic target group – who need information or recreational materials on a specific topic (such as sex, college applications, fashion, or Shakespeare). This assignment is about their needs, not ours – not about how to get them to use library materials, but about what resources libraries should make available, and why, and how those resources can be made accessible and appealing to those who need them. Think “information needs” and “communication needs” and “information-seeking behavior.” Think “user-oriented.” And since our core constituents here are adolescents, think “developmental needs.” 

2.      Identify materials and sources that will help fill their need (such as books, pamphlets, CD-ROMs, Internet sites, list-servs, or community agencies).  Content isn’t all that matters. Context matters (teachers may need professional literature, but have no time to read it – can you find time for them?). Taste matters. Learning styles matter. So evaluate your resources on the basis of use; how will they work?  

3.      Develop a strategy to meet your constituents’ needs and/or get those good resources into their hands. Possible strategies include programs, lesson plans, and handouts; annotated lists, booktalks, clubs, displays, pathfinders, poetry slams, reference scavenger hunts, teen-run literary magazines, information and referral services, and YA pages on the library’s Internet site. The single most powerful strategy is one you can use in combination with almost any other strategy: involve YAs themselves in designing services to YAs. 

Criteria for grading:

Your presentation should: 1) outline your rationale (who the target group is, what their need is, and what characteristics and circumstances will affect their choice of format, for instance); 2) define your strategy (what you’re going to do, why you think it will work, and how you’re going to evaluate its success); and 3) if possible online, give a very quick, selective demonstration of what your program might be like. Criteria for grading will include:

·         Target group and purpose clearly and persuasively identified (25%)

·         Materials well selected: useful, relevant, of good quality (25%)

·         Strategy effective: simple, appealing, informative; presenter recognizes any potential problems in the strategy and proposes solutions; planned evaluation is easy to implement and clearly linked to purpose (25%)

·         Presentation clear, well organized, easy to follow; visuals relevant, well designed; presentation is accessible and does not exceed normal download capacities (25%)

Notice that analysis of your group’s information needs and information-seeking behavior is really key here. A demonstration of your strategy (like a long annotated list of resources, or the text of a really fine booktalk, or pictures of a great display) can be a part of your presentation, but not the major part – no matter how good it is, it can’t stand alone for this assignment. Your planning, development, and evaluation have to be communicated, as well. 

Group presentations: What if two or more of you are interested in a given topic (such as mother-daughter book discussion groups; or using a MultiUser Domain, or MUD, to teach effective communications skills; or finding ways to introduce the culture of an immigrant group whose members are mostly illiterate in their own language)? We could have more than one presentation on any topic – or, if there’s enough for all of you to do, you may want to collaborate. Group presentations should include all the planning, development, and evaluation components required of individual presentations; presentation of the chosen strategies may go beyond what’s possible for single individuals. All members of a group are expected to participate fully.

TERM PROJECT (due November 8): The final project may be either 1) a traditional term paper on a collection development issue; 2) a collection development project; or 3) an alternative that will contribute to your expertise in collection development—be sure to negotiate it with me in advance.

Term Paper. Write a 8- to 12-page essay on a YA collection development issue. Some possible topics:

·         How have changes in the publishing industry over the past 10 or 20 years affected YA collections?

·         Should YA books in public libraries be interfiled with adult books?

·         Should online reviews replace standard sources like SLJ and High School Catalog in the library selection process?

·         How does the selection of paid online reference services affect the overall collection?

·         Is there a role for a comics collection in your high school library?

·         Should the Internet Use policy be integrated with the collection management policy?

For good paper ideas, scan journals or browse the course list of supplemental readings. Criteria for grading will include:

·         Topic useful, interesting, and well-researched (15%)

·         Coherent; includes all necessary information (10%)

·         Treatment demonstrates independent understanding, tact, original angle (15%)

·         Logical; main ideas clearly emphasized, minor points subordinated (25%)

·         Well-written; not too much reliance on lists, quotes, or internet downloads; correct grammar, spelling, and citations (20%)

·         Neat; double-spaced, good margins, legible type, etc. (5%)

Grading bias: Make it interesting and original. Well, of course I try to be fair. But if the paper is actually fun to read, I won’t have to bend over backwards. Here are a few suggestions, just to get you nicely tied up in knots before you begin:

·         Review the general requirements. 

·         Put your name and a good descriptive title right up at the top of your first page. 

·         Shoot for 8 to 12 pages. At an average of 250 words per page, that’ll be about 2000-3000 words. But length isn’t the most important consideration – don’t get hung up on it. 

·         Have a good thesis statement near the beginning, to let your reader know what your topic is exactly and where you plan to go with it. It’s usually better to pick a narrow, concrete topic rather than a big, abstract one. The first problem with “Censorship” as a topic is that it’s too broad. Try to cover that much territory in a 10-page paper, and you usually end up saying the same pious things about the main points that everybody else has already said. Note that a provocative question can function as a thesis statement. A couple of examples: 

o        “The popularity of Harry Potter has been discussed as a new phenomenon, but in fact it’s a very old one. This paper will explore similarities between Rowling’s series and the work of Charles Dickens, whose plot devices, characters, and marketing strategies made him a celebrity novelist over a century ago.” 

o        “How do author websites affect teen reading habits? Do the sites lead potential readers to the authors’ work, or are they primarily frequented by existing fans? Do readers understand printed works differently because of information picked up at the sites? Does reader comment at interactive sites influence the writers?” 

·         Argue one side of an issue that has at least two valid sides – an issue on which reasonable people could differ. (But don’t argue ad hominem, calling your opponents ugly names or imputing questionable motives to them – this is supposed to be more scholarly than polemic, and Rush Limbaugh is not a good model.) 

·         Have more continuous text than bulleted lists or quotes – even the great Jesse Shera sometimes wrote things that looked as if he just wrote an occasional sentence to link the quotes together, but it’s more fun (at least for an old fuddy-duddy like me) to read your coherent ideas. (Some people end with a quote. But why give somebody else the last word in your own paper?) 

·         Whether you use verbatim quotes or not, cite whatever you take from other sources – and use enough sources so I’ll know you didn’t just make up your good coherent ideas out of whole cloth. 

·         A word about “register,” or academic tone. Yes, your own ideas should be the core of this paper. Yes, it’s OK to use the first person singular pronoun. BUT you should also remember that this is an academic essay, and it’s not supposed to be so personal and chatty as a letter or even a speech at a library conference. (I worry that my class notes may be too chatty and set you a bad example, because I try to write them as if we were talking.) A good academic paper can be both lively and impersonal. You can include details drawn from your own experience, but the trick is to make them generally useful to readers you don’t know. Pretend you’re writing a journal article – if you were describing a program you probably wouldn’t say, “We decided to have the program meet on Tuesdays because after four hours of acrimonious phone calls we were able to get three part-timers to rearrange their schedules to cover it”; you certainly wouldn’t detail what everybody said in those phone calls; you’d settle for something more like, “Coverage was a challenge, but with the help of flexible staff members we found a weekly slot.” And if you were writing about an author, you probably wouldn’t say, “I decided to write about Lemony Snicket because I really can’t stand him but so many of our kids think he’s awesome,” although that might be the exact truth – you’d probably say something more general, like, “Lemony Snicket is one of the best-hated authors on the bestseller lists. Many adults see his work as shallow, negative, exploitative, and shamelessly commercial. How does he appeal to so many young readers? Is it all marketing, or is there more to it?”  

Collection Development Project. The object of this project is to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the selection process. You will be expected to state your objectives for the materials, develop criteria for selecting them, use at least three tools to identify and select them, and outline procedures for evaluating the materials. 

1.      Identify a portion of some library collection (real or imaginary) which you will choose to upgrade. Explain your rationale for this decision: Is this subject area heavily used? Does the library’s mission statement, or its collection development policy, call for collection in this area? Are current materials worn, or out of date? Can you confirm your impressions with hard evidence (e.g., average copyright date, turnover rate, annual assigments)? Remember, the goal is to make library resources supportive of users’ information needs. You may include non-book materials and even non-owned resources (like World Wide Web sites) if they contribute to that goal.

2.      Formulate your criteria for materials to be added to this part of the collection. These criteria should be consistent with the library’s overall selection policy, but clearly related to your rationale for the upgrade: what qualities would materials in this area have to have, in order to do what you want them to do in your collection? (If you just quote your library’s collection development policy at this point, it will probably be too general. For instance, you might be updating the craft section. Why? What’s the demand, and what’s wrong with the books you already have? If you think about it, you can identify criteria for crafts that wouldn’t be relevant to poetry – cost and availability of materials, for instance, and safety of procedures.) 

3.      Identify at least five items which you will consider for purchase (or acquisition—you might be able to acquire a WWW site for free), and locate at least two reviews of each. (Use at least three reviewing services in all.) To locate additional reviews, try sources like Book Review Index or Junior High School Catalog. Consider reviews that are available online.

4.      Evaluate the reviews. How many of your criteria are addressed in each review? What questions are left unanswered? (Can you tell from the reviews of craft books how much the materials cost, how hard they are to get, and how dangerous they are to use?) Do the reviewers address other criteria, which you considered less important for your purposes? (Some people find that it helps to make a grid, plotting criteria against reviews.) Do reviews of each title agree? If not, do you have reason to put more confidence in one than another? 

5.      Conclude with your own thoughts on this process. What are the strengths and weaknesses of selecting from reviews? Are online reviews as useful as, or more useful than, print reviews? Do online quotes of print reviews—for instance, at Amazon.com—contain all the same information? Is it next to impossible to find any reviews in your area—let alone more than one for each title? Did the reviews really get at your criteria, or did they lead you off in different directions? Emphasize collection-development ideas you can generalize, and remember the original information needs you were addressing. 

This whole procedure is unrealistic – it’s not something you would normally do in real life, where you may suddenly have $1000 or more to spend within two weeks or it will disappear. Finding reviews takes time; plotting grids to see what they’re telling you and what they’re omitting takes longer. Use the exercise as a chance to evaluate the sources you have to rely on. 

Criteria for grading will include:

·         Coherent; includes all necessary information, logically organized (25%)

·         Persuasive rationale; useful criteria for selection and evaluation in target area (25%)

·         Makes use of 3 standard selection sources (for a B) or more; evaluates usefulness of selection sources (25%)

·         Organized clearly, well-written; correct grammar, spelling, and citations (20%)

·         Neat; double-spaced, good margins, legible type, etc. (5%)

Grading bias: Focus on the information needs and information-seeking behavior of your library’s core constituents. Here are a few suggestions:

·         Review the general requirements. 

·         Put your name and a good descriptive title right up at the top of your first page. “Collection Development Paper” is not a very good title. “Updating the Meteorology Collection at Jello Middle School,” or “Supporting the High School Debate Team,” or “Meeting the Standards: Abolition and Slave Narratives at George Stevens Academy” would be more promising. 

·         Shoot for 7-10 pages. At an average of 250 words per page, that’ll be about 1750-2500 words. But length is even less important here than in the standard essay. 

·         Consider making a grid with your top criteria on one axis & review media on the other axis, so you can see which sources address which criteria. Example, for purely fictitious reviews of a purely fictitious craft book:

Journal

 Difficulty

 Cost of materials

 Safety

 Other books

SLJ

 fairly easy

 cheap

 not mentioned

 3 more appealing

Horn Book

 easy

 not too expensive

 sharp knife req.

 not mentioned

BCCB

 moderate

 not mentioned

 fumes

 not mentioned

Grid entries don’t need to be that elaborate; you could have “Y” and “N” and “N/A” codes, for instance.

·         List the books and other materials you evaluate as possible additions to your collection, including author, title, publisher, date, and any additional data points (recommended grade levels, ISBN numbers) you need. List your review sources, including dates, volume numbers, issues & pages cited. Cite anything else you take from other sources in a separate reference list or bibliography. 

·         A word about “register,” or academic tone. Yes, your own ideas should be the core of this paper. Yes, it’s OK to use the first person singular pronoun. BUT you should also remember that this is an academic essay, and the focus is supposed to be on user needs. In your introduction, when you describe your rationale for the part of the collection you choose to update, don’t wax autobiographical about how the assignment affected you and how you groped for a topic – focus instead on the objective reasons for developing that collection.

o        Not: “Dr. Eaton mentioned in class that the average age of school library media collections seems to be between 15 and 20 years, and my undergraduate degree was in astronomy, so I thought it would be interesting to check out the astronomy collection at my local middle school.”

o        More like: “New standards mandate that Rhode Island middle school students should study X. But are the resources in place to support their studies? Investigating the collection at Y Middle School, I found....”

MATERIALS LOG: (due November 22). During the term, keep a file of young adult books and media which you read or view. Examine a minimum of 30 items, including: 1) Catcher in the Rye and Witness; 2) at least 6 nonfiction books; 3) at least 2 print items other than books (like magazines, comics, or graphic novels); 4) at least two books of poetry, drama, or arts that encourage YA participation; 5) at least 6 “realistic” YA novels; 6) at least 4 examples of “genre” fiction, representing at least 2 different genres; and 7) at least 3 non-print popular media (such as TV shows, movies, top-40 radio shows, computer games or Internet sites – preferably not too educational). Add this all up and you get 25, which leaves you some electives. 

Selection: Try to pick things which are excellent (or at least well-recommended) and stand a chance of being read by contemporary kids. Rely on your text, annual YALSA lists, good reviews, and leads from young adults you know. Do not rely on personal or library collections which have not been updated and used lately. Balance your selections – look for a wide variety of authors, genres, and nonfiction subjects.

Required information for each entry: 1) which of the 7 categories it’s in; 2) a standard bibliographic citation; 3) the source of your recommendation for the item (e.g., “textbook,” “SLJ review, 12/90,” “Newbery Honor Book,” “classmate’s booktalk,” “teenager next door”). This is not meant as a busywork requirement. The assignment should increase your familiarity, not only with the literature, but with the sources you should use for building your collection.

Optional information for each entry: 1) symbols for age appropriateness, literary quality, potential popularity (see VOYA); 2) an evaluative review; 3) a short annotation; 4) notes on concerns you had as you read the book; 5) ideas you had about using the book; or 6) anything else that might be useful to you in remembering and using it. You may want to include different optional elements for different items. Please indicate any entries where you would especially like feedback (on your skill in reviewing or annotating, for instance).

Organization: Please alphabetize your entries within the 7 required categories.

Format: Preferred format for hard-copy submissions is wordprocessed on 8 1/2” by 11” paper, fastened by a staple or paper clip (no binders). For the return of your file, please provide a self-addressed envelope with adequate postage. Preferred for e-mail submissions: a single file (not a separate one for each entry or each group of entries); not over 500K; capable of being read in Word. 

Criteria for grading: B = 30 items, including all required items, with correct bibliographic entries and acceptable recommendations. You may be graded up if your log includes more than 30 entries or if your entries include features which make them more useful or interesting, such as clever annotation; notes which are individual, concise, and evocative; evaluations which show literary sensitivity or empathy for the young adult audience; excellent format and organization; or other forms of excellence which I haven’t yet thought of, but will appreciate when you come up with them.

WEEKLY POSTINGS (due regularly throughout the semester): Your participation grade will be based on what you post, both to the general class discussion and to small group exercises (the WebCT equivalent of them, anyhow).

It is expected that you will post to the class fairly regularly – on average at least once or twice a week. The “lecture” notes will include questions to get the discussion started, or you can comment on other aspects of the week’s topic. Substantive postings may consist of:

·         Responses to the class notes, or to classmates’ responses

·         Requests for clarification (from instructor or classmate), or questions to get us thinking about angles we may not have considered

·         Information about useful resources on the topic; URLs, conference dates, etc.

·         Observed YA reactions to book genres and titles

·         Etc.

Discussion and disagreement are fine; civility is of course expected at all times. A few things to avoid:

·         Posting very long messages, including thoughts on several different topics – it’s better to post short ones, and if you have ideas about different topics, post them with different descriptive headings

·         Posting a message, then proofreading it and posting a revised version so everybody gets to read it twice – especially if it has an attachment that takes time to download

·         Posting messages to the general discussion like “Great job, Sadie!” – it’s good to be mutually supportive, and messages like this can be especially nice in an online environment where presenters have no other way to tell if you like what they’re saying, but you can send your message to Sadie individually using the mail feature

·         Using the “reply” feature to send a message on a whole new topic – it’s better to use “compose” and pick a descriptive heading

Well, you get the idea. In grading your participation, I won’t necessarily mark you up for sending more than two messages a week, but I will for thoughtful contribution to the class – whether your contribution takes the form of useful information or insightful comment on a classmate’s point.


 

LSC 531: Reading Interests of Young Adults
Fall, 2003

In-person sessions will be held in Worcester on Saturdays. All other sessions are asynchronous. Instructor’s course notes will be posted by the given date, to support discussion. Discussion on that date’s topic should be concentrated in that week; discussion topics will be archived after two weeks. Assignments should be received by the instructor by 5 p.m. on the due date.

Date

Topic

Assignment due

Sept 6
In person

9-12: Adolescent development and society
1-2: GSLIS and focus group session, with LSC 508
2-3: Reader response theory
3-4: Book talking and book promotion

In-class memory exercise

Sept 13

Young adult readers: Literacy and interests
Annotations and annotated lists

Text: Chapters 1, 10

Sept 20

Coming of age: Catcher in the Rye
Reviews

Annotated list due
Text: Chapter 2
Catcher in the Rye

Sept 27

Collection management

Reader Response Essay

Oct 4
In person

Mini-booktalks: your favorite nonfiction
Using trade books in LMS or collaborative lesson plans

Online information needs presentations due in October; see sign-up sheet for your date
Optional: submit log in progress for feedback

Oct 11

Nonfiction I: Curricular support
Reference services

Text: Chapter 9 (pp. 259-297)

Oct 18

Nonfiction II: Entertainment and self-help
Sex and Intellectual Freedom

Text: Chapter 12

Oct 25

Popular media: Magazines, comics, Gameboy, etc.

Text: Chapter 3

Nov 1

Literary genres: Drama and Poetry
Public library teen programming

Text: Chapters 9 (pp. 297 ff.), 11

Nov 8

Realistic fiction: Family and Friends

Term project due
Text: Chapters 4, 8 (pp. 237-257)

Nov 15

Genre fiction I: Romance, Westerns, and Mysteries

Text: Chapters 5, 6

Nov 22

Genre fiction II: Science Fiction, Fantasy, and the End of the World

Materials log due
Text: Chapter 7

Dec 6
In person

Mini-booktalks: your favorite fiction
One class, one book: Karen Hesse, Witness: A Novel (Scholastic, 2001)

 

 


 

LSC 531: Online Presentation Signup, Fall, 2003

 

For this assignment, you will take a marketing approach to the promotion of YA books and resources. Start with the kids, and examine their needs carefully before deciding what the library’s response should be. The needs can be school-related or personal, and the responses can be SLMC lesson plans, public library programs, or interagency activities; they don’t always have to involve face-to-face programming, although that’s often the best. Book talks are great, but if the need you’re addressing is for information teens don’t want anybody to know they need, are there sneakier, less intrusive ways to get it to them? How can you meet them where they are?

 

Your topic does not have to match the topic of the day. Your presentation will be due on the date you choose. You may work individually or in small groups.

 

Date

Presenter(s)

Topic? (Preliminary)

October 4

Nonfiction & Lesson Plans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

October 11
Nonfiction & Reference

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

October 18
Nonfiction & Intellectual Freedom

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

October 25

Media